Search

Background: A large proportion of patients presenting for autologous breast reconstruction have a history of prior abdominal surgeries such as obstetric, gynecologic, or general surgical procedures. The impact of prior abdominal wall violation on the ability to perform free tissue transfer from the abdomen needs to be explored and characterized. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of prior abdominal surgery on perfusion-related complications and donor-site morbidity in free tissue abdominal transfer., Methods: All patients who underwent abdominally based free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2011 at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania were included. In addition to collecting data on standard patient past medical histories, comorbidities, and case characteristics, we also noted specific types of prior abdominal surgeries, number of prior surgeries, and if the rectus sheath was violated. Outcomes assessed included thrombotic complications, flap loss, major surgical complications, minor surgical complications, delayed wound healing, and subsequent hernia formation., Results: Eight hundred twelve patients underwent 1257 free flap breast reconstructions during the study period. Four hundred seventeen (51.4%) women had undergone prior abdominal surgery. The most common prior abdominal surgeries included total abdominal hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (35.7%), cesarean delivery (33.8%), and appendectomy (12.7%). No significant differences were noted in the number of major intraoperative complications (P = 0.68), total thrombotic events (P = 0.339), or flap losses (P = 0.53). Patients who had undergone prior rectus sheath violation were found to experience a greater amount of delayed healing of the donor site (22.7% vs 16.5%, P = 0.03). Additionally, a higher rate of postoperative hernia formation was noted in patients who had undergone prior hernia repairs (13.6% vs 3.3%, P = 0.04)., Conclusions: A significant portion of patients presenting for breast reconstruction have had prior abdominal surgeries. This study demonstrates that these prior procedures represent an acceptable level of risk; although this issue should still be addressed during preoperative patient counseling. In patients with prior hernia repairs, however, additional care should be given to the fascial closure as these patients may be at higher risk for subsequent hernia formation after abdominally based breast reconstruction.

Background: For patients with BRCA mutations, a simultaneous procedure that combines risk-reducing operation of the ovaries with mastectomy and breast reconstruction is an attractive option. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes and associated cost of performing simultaneous mastectomy, free flap breast reconstruction (FFR), and gynecologic procedure., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent bilateral FFR from 2005 to 2012. Four hundred twenty-two patients were identified who underwent bilateral breast reconstruction without a simultaneous gynecologic procedure. Forty-two patients were identified who underwent simultaneous FFR and gynecologic procedure. Clinical outcomes, medical and surgical complications, and hospital costs were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups., Results: A total of 928 free flaps were performed on 464 patients. Forty-two patients had a simultaneous gynecologic procedure at the time of breast reconstruction. Twenty-three (54.8%) patients within the study group underwent simultaneous bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (BSO), whereas the other 19 (45.2%) underwent both total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO. Eighty-four free flaps were performed in this cohort (n = 48 muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous, n = 28 deep inferior epigastric perforator, n = 4 superficial inferior epigastric perforator, n = 4 transverse upper gracilis). Mean operative time was 573 minutes. Mean hospitalization was 5.3 days. Postoperatively, 4 patients experienced an anastomotic thrombosis; 2 patients had an arterial thrombosis and 2 patients had a venous thrombosis. There were 2 flap failures, 2 patients with mastectomy skin flap necrosis, 11 patients who developed breast wound healing complications, and 6 patients who developed abdominal wound healing complications. Surgical and medical complication rates did not differ significantly between those who had simultaneous procedures, and those who did not. There was a statistically significant difference in the average total cost when comparing the group of patients receiving prophylactic mastectomy/FFR/total abdominal hysterectomy and/or BSO versus the patients who did not have combined gynecologic procedures at the time of reconstruction ($22,994.52 vs $21,029.23, P = 0.0004)., Conclusions: For the high-risk breast cancer patient, a combined mastectomy, free flap reconstruction, and gynecologic procedure represents an attractive and safe option.

Background: Breast reconstruction is an integral component of breast cancer treatment, often aiding in restoring a patient's sense of femininity. However, many patients choose to have subsequent cosmetic surgery. The purpose of this study is to investigate the reasons that motivate patients to have cosmetic surgery after breast reconstruction., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective study examining patients who had breast reconstruction and subsequent cosmetic surgery at the University of Pennsylvania Health System between January 2005 and June 2012. This cohort received a questionnaire assessing the influences and impact of their reconstructive and cosmetic procedures., Results: A total of 1,214 patients had breast reconstruction, with 113 patients (9.3%) undergoing cosmetic surgery after reconstruction. Of 42 survey respondents, 35 had autologous breast reconstruction (83.3%). Fifty-two cosmetic procedures were performed in survey respondents, including liposuction (26.9%) and facelift (15.4%). The most common reason for pursuing cosmetic surgery was the desire to improve self-image (n = 26, 61.9%), with 29 (69.0%) patients feeling more self-conscious of appearance after reconstruction. Body image satisfaction was significantly higher after cosmetic surgery (P = 0.0081). Interestingly, a multivariate analysis revealed that patients who experienced an improvement in body image after breast reconstruction were more likely to experience a further improvement after a cosmetic procedure (P = 0.031, OR = 17.83). Patients who were interested in cosmetic surgery prior to reconstruction were also more likely to experience an improvement in body image after cosmetic surgery (P = 0.012, OR = 22.63)., Conclusion: Cosmetic surgery may improve body image satisfaction of breast reconstruction patients and help to further meet their expectations.