Search

Millions of people worldwide suffer from trauma- or age-related orthopedic diseases such as osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, or cancer. Tissue Engineering (TE) and Regenerative Medicine are multidisciplinary fields focusing on the development of artificial organs, biomimetic engineered tissues, and cells to restore or maintain tissue and organ function. While allogenic and future autologous transplantations are nowadays the gold standards for both cartilage and bone defect repair, they are both subject to important limitations such as availability of healthy tissue, donor site morbidity, and graft rejection. Tissue engineered bone and cartilage products represent a promising and alternative approach with the potential to overcome these limitations. Since the development of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) such as TE products requires the knowledge of diverse regulation and an extensive communication with the national/international authorities, the aim of this review is therefore to summarize the state of the art on the clinical applications of human bone marrow-derived stromal cells for cartilage and bone TE. In addition, this review provides an overview of the European legislation to facilitate the development and commercialization of new ATMPs.

Animal experimentation requires a solid and rational moral foundation. Objective and emphatic decision-making and protocol evaluation by researchers and ethics committees remain a difficult and sensitive matter. This article presents three perspectives that facilitate a consideration of the minimally acceptable standard for animal experiments, in particular, in tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine. First, we review the boundaries provided by law and public opinion in America and Europe. Second, we review contemporary moral theory to introduce the Neo-Rawlsian contractarian theory to objectively evaluate the ethics of animal experiments. Third, we introduce the importance of available reduction, replacement, and refinement strategies, which should be accounted for in moral decision-making and protocol evaluation of animal experiments. The three perspectives are integrated into an algorithmic and graphic harm-benefit analysis tool based on the most relevant aspects of animal models in TE. We conclude with a consideration of future avenues to improve animal experiments.

This commentary places the contributions from several Asian-Pacific countries that constitute this Special Issue in the context of trends in global regulation of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products and services. It concentrates on the generic issues that face regulation in each jurisdiction and the manner how these issues have to be faced in the light of cultural, political, and economic regional differences.

Tissue engineered medical products (TEMPs) use state-of-the-art technologies and offer the patients with alternative clinical options for diseases that conventional treatments may fail or be incompetent. However promising, this technology is comparatively new with very limited hands-on experiences with both manufacturing and clinical therapy. Of great significance to products with such complexity and novelty is the establishment of a complete jurisdiction framework and a standardization database so that the safety of the technique in clinical treatment can be ensured. Although different regulatory routes are adopted in different countries, risks are generally considered to be derived from the cellular components within the product, the material scaffolds, and potentially from the final products. This article is to provide an insight of the regulatory considerations and the role of China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) in the supervision of TEMPs.

With the worldwide growth of cell and tissue therapy (CTT) in treating diseases, the need of a standardized regulatory policy is of paramount concern. Research in CTT in Malaysia has reached stages of clinical trials and commercialization. In Malaysia, the regulation of CTT is under the purview of the National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau (NPCB), Ministry of Health (MOH). NPCB is given the task of regulating CTT, under a new Cell and Gene Therapy Products framework, and the guidelines are currently being formulated. Apart from the laboratory accreditation, researchers are advised to follow Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Therapy from the Medical Development Division, MOH, published in 2009.

The regulatory environment for cell- and tissue-based therapeutic (CTT) products is rapidly evolving and drug regulatory agencies are working toward establishing a risk-based system in their regulatory approach. In Singapore, CTT products such as cell therapy products, stem cell products, and tissue-engineered products in regenerative medicine are regulated as medicinal products. CTT products are defined as articles containing or consisting of autologous or allogeneic human or xenogeneic cells or tissues that are used for or administered to, or intended to be used for or administered to human beings for the diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of human diseases or conditions. Currently, we have applied a risk-based tiered approach whereby high-risk CTT products (substantially manipulated products, products intended for nonhomologous use or combined/used in conjunction with a drug, biologic, or device) are regulated under the Medicines Act. A new standalone regulation for CTT products is being proposed under the Health Products Act where we propose to regulate the entire spectrum (high and low risk) of CTT products.

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have been the subject of increasingly intensive research for over 20 years, and there is concern in some quarters over the lack of clinically useful products despite the large sums of money invested. This review provides one perspective on orthopedic applications from a biologist working in academia. It is suggested that the delay in clinical application is not atypical of new, biologically based technologies. Some barriers to progress are acknowledged and discussed, but it is also noted that preclinical studies have identified several promising types of cells, scaffolds, and morphogenetic signals, which, although not optimal, are worth advancing toward human trials to establish a bridgehead in the clinic. Although this transitional technology will be replaced by more sophisticated, subsequent systems, it will perform valuable pioneering functions and facilitate the clinical development of the field. Some strategies for achieving this are suggested., (© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)

The fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine have the capacity to substantially impact clinical care through the introduction of new products that can address unmet clinical needs, or significantly improve on present therapies. These products will be developed through the demonstration of therapeutic effectiveness, adequate safety, and meeting regulatory requirements. The technology used in the product will dictate the product development and manufacturing costs; the regulatory pathway; and the time taken to complete clinical trials, gain regulatory approval, and become commercialized. A comparison of the required investment of time and funds, with the potential revenue generated, allows for a determination of the likely commercialization opportunity. Ultimately, the long-term success of a product will be dependent on its clinical effectiveness and commercial viability., (© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.)

Tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine products are promising innovative therapies that can address unmet clinical needs. These products are often combinations of cells, scaffolds, and other factors and are complex in both structure and function. Their complexity introduces challenges for product developers to establish novel manufacturing and characterization techniques to ensure that these products are safe and effective prior to clinical trials in humans. Although there are only a few commercial products that are currently in the market, many more tissue-engineered and regenerative medicine products are under development. Therefore, it is the purpose of this article to help product developers in the early stages of product development by providing insight into the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) process and by highlighting some of the key scientific considerations that may be applicable to their products. We provide resources that are publically available from the FDA and others that are of potential interest. As the provided information is general in content, product developers should contact the FDA for feedback regarding their specific products. Also described are ways through which product developers can informally and formally interact with the FDA early in the development process to help in the efficient progression of products toward clinical trials.

Currently, well-established clinical therapeutic approaches for bone reconstruction are restricted to the transplantation of autografts and allografts, and the implantation of metal devices or ceramic-based implants to assist bone regeneration. Bone grafts possess osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties; however, they are limited in access and availability and associated with donor-site morbidity, hemorrhage, risk of infection, insufficient transplant integration, graft devitalization, and subsequent resorption resulting in decreased mechanical stability. As a result, recent research focuses on the development of alternative therapeutic concepts. The field of tissue engineering has emerged as an important approach to bone regeneration. However, bench-to-bedside translations are still infrequent as the process toward approval by regulatory bodies is protracted and costly, requiring both comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies. The subsequent gap between research and clinical translation, hence, commercialization, is referred to as the "Valley of Death" and describes a large number of projects and/or ventures that are ceased due to a lack of funding during the transition from product/technology development to regulatory approval and subsequently commercialization. One of the greatest difficulties in bridging the Valley of Death is to develop good manufacturing processes and scalable designs and to apply these in preclinical studies. In this article, we describe part of the rationale and road map of how our multidisciplinary research team has approached the first steps to translate orthopedic bone engineering from bench to bedside by establishing a preclinical ovine critical-sized tibial segmental bone defect model, and we discuss our preliminary data relating to this decisive step.

Tissue engineering is an important tool for the treatment of damaged surface and lining epithelia. A source of cells and biocompatible substrates upon which cells can grow and differentiate are key components of this technology. Cultured normal human epithelial cells reconstitute sheets of stratified epithelia that retain biochemical and histological characteristics as well as specific differentiation features of the original donor site. Maintenance of epithelial stem cells in culture and a well-prepared receiving wound bed allow to permanently regenerate full-thickness wounds by means of in vitro reconstituted epithelia. Further, cultured cells produce growth factors and extracellular matrix (ECM) components that help resident cells to contribute to the wound-healing process. Biological matrices enhance the performance of the in vitro reconstituted epithelia. Owing to their similarity to the ECM, natural polymers offer the advantage of being similar to macromolecules that the human environment is prepared to recognize. They also maintain biological information and physical and chemical features that are instructive for cells used to populate them. This article discusses the developments of tissues engineered for cutaneous and mucosal regeneration. Native tissues and their stem cells are also considered, to enhance understanding of the extensive field of tissue reconstruction.

The development of tissue engineering in Europe suffers from the absence of a coherent regulatory framework. Therefore, the European Commission has drafted a directive to regulate all tissue-engineered products in a comprehensive yet flexible framework. This article analyzes the directive from an ethical viewpoint. We argue that there are shortcomings to the proposal because of disjunctures at various regulatory levels and because responsibilities of several authorities have not been clearly established. The conscious decision to exclude ethically sensitive issues from the regulation will contribute to a continued complex regulatory environment for tissue-engineered products in Europe. We suggest that, from the start, ethical issues must be considered as an integral part of the regulation of tissue-engineered products. We propose the development of a multistage regulatory framework that makes provision for the diversity of tissue-engineered products, whereby the hybrid character and the ethical sensitivity of these products are fully taken into account. We equally suggest that the general public remain involved in regulatory issues concerning tissue-engineered products.

Tissue engineering (TE) is an emerging technology that combines expertise in life sciences, clinical medicine, and engineering. Current challenges in TE include anticipating and streamlining appropriate regulation with product development. Consequently this study has focused on views of developers, companies, and regulators on biological risks of TE products, aspects of commercial applications, and patentability. Most concerns about TE products focus on risk of cancer formation, infection risk, and rejection risk. Thus, at the present time, product developers should follow guidelines for medicinal products, in order to address product safety at an adequate level. According to the data of the present study, cell and biomaterial products, manipulated cells, and scaffolds appear to be the primary interest for commercial product development. In contrast, producing services were not considered as interesting. Constraints are also imposed by patentability, which stipulates demands for technical performance and highlights ethical issues, which are difficult to address.