Search

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery has attracted a great deal of interest in the surgical community in recent years, including bariatric surgery. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SILSG) has been proposed as an alternative to the multiport laparoscopic procedure; however, it has yet to meet wide acceptance and application.Objective: We aim to summarize existing data on SILSG and check the procedure's feasibility, technical details, safety, and, if possible, outcomes.Materials and Methods: We checked the most important databases for studies concerning SILSG and included all these that summarized the criteria placed and contained the data needed for this review. We excluded case reports.Results: Nineteen studies complied with the criteria of our review, containing a total of 1679 patients. Their mean age has been 38.91 years and the mean preoperative body mass index has been 41.8 kg/m2. In majority of cases (60.5%), a left upper quadrant incision has been preferred and in 97.6%, a commercially available multiport system has been picked. A wide variety of instruments have been used and mean operating time has been 94.6 minutes. One conversion to open surgery has been reported and 7.4% required the placement of additional ports. There was a complication rate of 7.38% (most common being bleeding with a rate of 2.5%) and a reoperation rate of 2.8%. Mean excess weight loss for a follow-up of 1 year was achieved in 53.7% of patients and was 70.06%. A tendency for less analgesia and better wound satisfaction has been reported.Conclusions: SILSG is safe and feasible. However, there is insufficient evidence to recommend it as the new gold standard for sleeve gastrectomy in the place of conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Randomized controlled trials are needed to analyze the results and the possible benefits of this technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) for morbid obesity is a challenging operation. The application of robotic techniques has been shown to ease the technical difficulties and reduce perioperative morbidity, mainly because it facilitates the construction of the gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJ). Robotic laparoscopic RYGBP (LRYGBP) has been reported either as totally robotic with manual suturing of the GJ or as robotically assisted with the use of the robot only for the construction of the GJ. A totally robotic LRYGBP with a combined stapled and manual GJ has never been reported. Patients and Methods: Nine consecutive patients underwent totally robotic LRYGBP. The GJ was fashioned with a combination of the linear stapler and manual suturing. Results: Mean preoperative body mass index was 45.3 ± 4.7 kg/m2. In 1 case, we had to undock the Da Vinci Surgical System at the time of the jejunojejunostomy due to unfavorable ergonomics. Mean time to dock the robot was 16.3 ± 3.3 minutes, whereas mean total operative time was 197.2 ± 12.3 minutes. Immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality equaled zero. One patient developed a stenosis of the GJ amenable to endoscopic dilatation. The mean excess weight loss rate 1-year postoperative was 79% ± 15%. Conclusion: Totally robotic LRYGBP can duplicate precisely any conventional technique without any compromise in operative time, short- or long-term results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]