Search

Objectives: We hoped to understand (1) how parents of seriously ill neonatal intensive care unit patients conceptualize neonatal serious illness, and (2) how parent and physician perspectives on neonatal serious illness might differ. Design: This was a prospective survey study. Setting/Subjects: Parent members of the Courageous Parents Network. Measurements: We circulated a modified version of a previously developed survey. Participants were presented with a list of potential definition components and asked to rank components by importance and suggest modifications to the definition as needed. Thematic analysis of free-text responses was conducted to identify key themes in parent responses Results: Eighty-eight percent of parent participants agreed or strongly agreed with our working definition of neonatal serious illness. Parents agreed with the content of the definition but suggested using different language (especially less jargon) when using the definition to inform conversations with parents. Conclusions: The majority of parents surveyed for this study supported our definition of neonatal serious illness, which suggests that it may be useful for clinical and research applications. At the same time, parent responses revealed important differences in perceptions about serious illness between parents and physicians. In addition, parents will likely use any definition of neonatal serious illness differently than clinicians. We therefore propose that our definition be used to identify neonates with serious illness for the purposes of research and clinical care, but should not be used verbatim for communication with parents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To explore (1) how neonatal nurses (NN) and social workers (SW) define serious illness and (2) how physician, nurse, and SW perceptions of serious illness differ. Design: Prospective survey study. Setting/Subjects: Members of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses or the National Association of Perinatal Social Workers. Measurements: We circulated a modified version of a previously developed survey. Participants were given a list of definition components and asked to rank components by importance and to suggest modifications. Results: Eighty-eight percent of participants agreed with our definition of neonatal serious illness. NN and SW differ in important ways in their views of neonatal serious illness when compared with physicians and parents. Conclusions: Our definition of neonatal serious illness has broad acceptability and may be useful for clinical care and research. Future work should prospectively identify patients with neonatal serious illness and establish the usefulness of our definition in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: About 16,000 infants die in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) each year with many experiencing invasive medical treatments and high number of symptoms.1 To inform better management, we characterized diagnoses, symptoms, and patterns of care among infants who died in the NICU. Method: Retrospective electronic medical record (EMR) review of 476 infants who died following admission to a large regional level IV NICU in the United States over a 10-year period. Demographic, symptom, diagnosis, treatment, and end-of-life characteristics were extracted. Results: About half of infants were male (55.9%, n = 266), average gestational age was 31.3 weeks (standard deviation [SD] = 6.5), and average age at death was 40.1 days (SD = 84.5; median = 12; range: 0–835). Race was documented for 65% of infants, and most were White (67.0%). One-third of infants (n = 138) were seen by fetal medicine. Most infants experienced pain through both the month and week before death (79.6%), however, infants with necrotizing enterocolitis had more symptoms in the week before death. Based on EMR, infants had more symptoms, and received more medical interventions and comfort measures during the week before death compared with the month prior. Only 35% (n = 166) received a palliative care referral. Conclusions: Although the medical profiles of infants who die in the NICU are complex, the overall number of symptoms was less than in older pediatric populations. For infants at high risk of mortality rate, providers should assess for common symptoms over time. To manage symptoms as effectively as possible, both timely and continuous communication with parents and early referral to palliative care are recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Respiratory distress is one of the most commonly reported symptoms in infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality if not assessed and managed appropriately. Yet, a validated scale for assessing respiratory distress across clinicians in infants is not available. Furthermore, a valid and reliable scale is needed as a dependent measure in studies about infant respiratory distress. Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish a content validity index (CVI) of a modification of the Respiratory Distress Observation Scale© (RDOS) for use with infants who are at least 37 weeks gestational age. Design: The RDOS© was revised using the respiratory characteristics of infants and offered to clinical experts for review. Setting/Subjects: A pool of nine experts in neonatal care, including two neonatologists, two nurse practitioners, one respiratory therapist, two staff nurses, and two nurse scientists, evaluated the revised scale for content validity. Results: The scale CVI was calculated by averaging the item CVIs that were ≥0.80 yielding a scale CVI = 0.96. Our content experts further recommended adding the variable capillary perfusion. Conclusions: Content validity was established. This RDOS-Infant has clinical and research utility if subsequent psychometric testing yields additional acceptable reliability and validity statistics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study is to report the benefits and burdens of palliative research participation on children, siblings, parents, clinicians, and researchers. Background: Pediatric palliative care requires research to mature the science and improve interventions. A tension exists between the desire to enhance palliative and end-of-life care for children and their families and the need to protect these potentially vulnerable populations from untoward burdens. Methods: Systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines with prepared protocol registered as PROSPERO #CRD42018087304. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library were searched (2000–2017). English-language studies depicting the benefits or burdens of palliative care or end-of-life research participation on either pediatric patients and/or their family members, clinicians, or study teams were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Results: Twenty-four studies met final inclusion criteria. The benefit or burden of palliative care research participation was reported for the child in 6 papers; siblings in 2; parents in 19; clinicians in 3; and researchers in 5 papers. Benefits were more heavily emphasized by patients and family members, whereas burdens were more prominently emphasized by researchers and clinicians. No paper utilized a validated benefit/burden scale. Discussion: The lack of published exploration into the benefits and burdens of those asked to take part in pediatric palliative care research and those conducting the research is striking. There is a need for implementation of a validated benefit/burden instrument or interview measure as part of pediatric palliative and end-of-life research design and reporting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]