Search

Background: Little is known about specialty mental health and/or substance use disorder (MH/SUD) clinicians' experiences transitioning from in-person to telehealth care, to treat a diagnostically diverse population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Survey of outpatient MH/SUD clinicians (psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, psychologists, and licensed clinical social workers; N = 107) at a psychiatric hospital. Clinician satisfaction and experiences using telehealth across a variety of services (individual, group or family therapy, initial assessments, evaluation and management, and neuropsychological assessment) were assessed using a mixed-methods approach. Results: Across services, a majority agreed/strongly agreed that telehealth provided an opportunity to build rapport with patients (67–88%) and they could treat their patients' needs well (71–88%). The interest in continuing to use telehealth when in-person visits resume varied by type of service provided (50–71%). Group therapy and initial assessment were lowest (50% and 51%, respectively). Clinicians noted telehealth improved access to care for patients with logistical barriers, competing demands, mobility difficulties, and medical concerns; but was more challenging to care for patients with certain psychiatric characteristics (e.g., psychosis, paranoia, catatonia, high distractibility, and avoidance), high symptom severity, or who needed to improve social skills. Telehealth influenced the therapeutic process (e.g., observations of family dynamic, increased patient/clinician therapeutic alliance). Discussion and Conclusions: MH/SUD clinicians who quickly transitioned to telehealth care during the pandemic were largely satisfied with telehealth, but also identified challenges related to specific patient characteristics, or types of MH/SUD services. These observations warrant additional study to better delineate the role for an expanded use of telehealth postpandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Women face unique issues related to their substance use. Treatment programs that incorporate gender-specific components can to lead to enhanced outcomes for women with substance use disorders (SUDs). Nevertheless, most women receive treatment in mixed-gender SUD treatment programs that lack womenspecific components. Programs cite lack of expertise and staff time as barriers to providing gender-specific care. Leveraging technology can address some of the challenges of providing gender-specific care in a mixed-gender setting by offering an accessible, cost-effective alternative to in-person services. Materials and Methods: We developed a gender-specific, web-based, psychoeducational intervention for women with SUDs as an addition to treatment as usual in a mixed-gender SUD treatment program. Next, we examined the feasibility and acceptability of this single-session intervention in a prepilot study with 30 women with SUDs. Based on these data, we refined the intervention and tested feasibility and acceptability with 60 women with SUDs. Results: Participants indicated a high level of satisfaction with the intervention. Satisfaction did not significantly differ by level of care (inpatient, partial hospitalization, or outpatient) or age, and was not associated with the number of previous treatment episodes. Participants highlighted the importance of addressing co-occurring disorders, trauma, and sexual abuse in SUD treatment for women. Conclusions: Women in this study found this web-based gender-specific intervention relevant regardless of their previous experience in treatment. Delivery of this intervention is feasible and has the potential to be a highly sustainable strategy for increasing exposure to gender-specific SUD components of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]