Search

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery in pediatrics is still uncommon and few studies assessed in clinical practice advantages and disadvantages. Applicability and effectiveness of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic procedures in congenital and acquired conditions in children are still unknown. We assessed applicability and effectiveness of 3D compared with 2D laparoscopic procedures in a pediatric setting. Methods: Two groups of patients who underwent 3D or 2D laparoscopic surgical procedures between May 2016 and April 2018 were compared. Each 3D/2D laparoscopic procedure was assessed with a surgeon/assistant questionnaire. Results: The 3D group included 30 patients and the 2D group 32 patients. The analysis of the 3D/2D questionnaire showed statistically significant superiority of 3D technical aspects (P = .0000), allowing a better spatial orientation and depth perception, reducing manipulation and trauma to tissues. Moreover, no difference was reported in physical complaints (P = .7084), but decreased visual fatigue was highlighted by surgeon (P = .000). Conclusions: In pediatric patients, 3D laparoscopic procedures prove to be more effective facilitating the surgeon's performance, while maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]