Search

The Microbicide Trials Network-017 study was undertaken to characterize the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic profile of the reduced-glycerin (RG) 1% tenofovir (RG-TFV) gel compared to oral emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF). The study was a Phase 2, three-period, randomized sequence, open-label, expanded safety and acceptability crossover study. In each 8-week study period, HIV-1-uninfected participants were randomized to RG-TFV rectal gel daily or RG-TFV rectal gel before and after receptive anal intercourse (RAI) (or at least twice weekly in the event of no RAI), or daily oral FTC/TDF. A mucosal substudy was conducted at sites in the United States and Thailand. Samples were collected to evaluate PK and ex vivo biopsy challenge with HIV-1. A total of 195 men who have sex with men and transgender women were enrolled in the parent study and 37 in the mucosal substudy. As previously reported, both products were found to be safe and acceptable. Systemic TFV concentrations were significantly higher following oral exposure and daily rectal administration compared to RAI-associated product use ( p  < .001). All three routes of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administration resulted in the inhibition of explant infection ( p  < .05), and there was a significant inverse correlation between explant HIV-1 p24 and tissue concentrations of TFV and FTC ( p  < .0001). Despite significant differences in systemic and mucosal drug concentrations, all three PrEP regimens were able to protect rectal explants from ex vivo HIV infection. These data suggest that there is a rationale for co-development of oral and topical antiretroviral PrEP for HIV prevention. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT01687218.

The Combination HIV Antiretroviral Rectal Microbicide-3 (CHARM-03) study was a randomized, open-label, crossover Phase 1 safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) study of oral maraviroc (MVC) and MVC 1% gel. At a single site, healthy HIV-uninfected men and women were enrolled and randomized to an open label crossover sequence of eight consecutive daily exposures to MVC 300 mg dosed orally, MCV 1% gel dosed rectally, and MVC 1% gel dosed vaginally. Male participants received oral and rectal dosing and female participants received oral, rectal, and vaginal dosing. Assessments were undertaken at baseline and following each 8-day period and included collection of plasma, rectal/cervical tissue (CT), and rectal/endocervical/vaginal fluids. Eleven men and nine women were enrolled. Two participants withdrew from the study before receiving study product. There were 25 adverse events, of which 24 were Grade 1 (G1) and one was G2 (unrelated). After eight doses, MVC was quantifiable in all samples following oral, rectal, or vaginal product administration. The highest drug concentrations in plasma, rectal tissue (RT), and CT were associated with oral, rectal, and vaginal drug delivery, respectively. There were significant reductions in tissue drug concentrations when rectal and cervical biopsies were incubated in media before tissue processing for PK ( p  < .0001). Only oral MVC was associated with limited protection in the rectal explant HIV challenge model ( p  < .05). There were no immunological changes in RT, and all products were acceptable to participants. In conclusion, all products were found to be safe and acceptable and did not induce local inflammation. The lack of ex vivo efficacy demonstrated in study samples may be due to rapid disassociation of MVC from the explant tissue. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02346084.

Dapivirine (DPV), formulated as vaginal ring, demonstrated HIV risk reduction. MTN-026 explored DPV, formulated as rectal gel, for safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and acceptability. HIV-uninfected men and women aged 18-45 years were enrolled at United States and Thailand sites and randomized 2:1 to receive DPV 0.05% or placebo gel via rectal applicator. A single-dose phase was followed by seven observed daily doses. Plasma and fluid and tissue from both rectum and cervix were collected at baseline and after the final dose over 72 h for PK, ex-vivo HIV-1 biopsy challenge, histology, and flow cytometry. Twenty-eight participants were randomized; 2 terminated early; 9 were female and 19 male; 12 were white, 11 Asian, 4 black, and 1 other race/ethnicity. Mean age was 28.5 and 34.2 years in the DPV and placebo arms, respectively. Thirty adverse events occurred (all Grade 1 or 2, except one unrelated Grade 3) without study arm differences. DPV rectal tissue concentrations [median (interquartile range)] 0.5-1 and 2 h after a single dose were 256 ng/g [below the lower limit of quantification (BLQ)-666] and BLQ (BLQ-600), respectively, then BLQ (BLQ-BLQ) from 24 to 72 h; concentrations following multiple doses were similar. The largest median DPV plasma concentrations were 0.33 ng/mL (0.15-0.48) after one dose and 0.40 (0.33-0.49) after seven doses. The DPV rectal gel was acceptable and without safety concerns. While DPV plasma concentrations were similar to the vaginal ring, rectal tissue concentrations were well below vaginal ring tissue concentrations, suggesting need for reformulation. Clinical trial number: NCT03239483.

The MWRI-01 study characterized the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) profile of rilpivirine (RPV) long acting (LA) in a model of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Prospective, open-label Phase 1 study. The safety and acceptability of three repeated doses of RPV LA were monitored. Blood, tissue (rectal, cervical, and vaginal), and biological fluids (vaginal and endocervical) were collected at baseline and at 1- to 2-month intervals throughout the study for PK and PD assessment. Eight women and four men received three intramuscular doses of 1,200 mg of RPV LA given 8 weeks apart. There were a total of 195 adverse events (AEs) reported, of which 138 (70.8%) were Grade 1 and 55 (28.2%) were Grade 2. The most common AE was injection site pain. Geometric mean (90% confidence interval) plasma RPV concentrations at 56 days after the first and third doses were 39 (33-45) ng/mL (female)/29 (17-40) ng/mL (male) and 59 (45-62) ng/mL (female)/40 (30-51) ng/mL (male), respectively. Exposure to RPV LA was associated with significant inhibition of HIV-1 BaL viral replication in the ex vivo rectal explant model ( p  < .0001) that persisted for up to 4 months after the third dose of RPV LA. In contrast, no viral suppression was seen in cervicovaginal tissue. Multiple dose administration of RPV LA was safe and well tolerated, and was associated with prolonged suppression of viral replication in rectal explant tissue.

Ranpirnase (RNP) is a low molecular weight type III endoribonuclease, which demonstrates broad antiviral and antitumor properties. We sought to characterize the antiviral activity of RNP against HIV-1 and to determine whether RNP modulates local inflammatory changes associated with HIV infection in the colorectal explant model. Colorectal explants were incubated for 2 h with HIV-1 BaL , in the presence of increasing concentrations of RNP (0-60 μg/mL). After washing, explants were cultured for 14 days, with supernatant collected at days 3, 7, 10, and 14. All samples were assayed for HIV-1 p24. Additionally, 30 soluble inflammatory biomarkers were assayed in the day 3 supernatant sample. Other biopsies were stimulated with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) (10 μg/mL) in the presence of RNP and soluble biomarkers assayed at day 3. RNP inhibited productive infection of the colorectal explants with HIV-1 BaL and induced a dose-dependent decrease in 15/30 biomarkers. Affected biomarkers included IP-10, MDC, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, TARC, IL12-p40, IL-15, IL-17, IL-1α, IL-7, IFNγ, IL12-p70, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-5, and TNF-β. Similarly, RNP dose-dependent inhibition was demonstrated in 7/30 biomarkers after LPS stimulation, all of which overlapped with HIV-1 BaL -induced biomarker changes. The ability of RNP to inhibit both colorectal explant HIV-1 BaL infection and inflammatory changes associated with HIV-1 infection makes RPN a promising agent for topical rectal pre-exposure prophylaxis.

During Phase 1 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamics studies, participants may undergo multiple sigmoidoscopies, with a collection of 10-20 biopsies during each procedure. This article characterizes the safety of flexible sigmoidoscopies in clinical trial participants. We determined the number of flexible sigmoidoscopies and rectal biopsies that participants underwent and analyzed the frequency, duration, and severity of flexible sigmoidoscopy-related adverse events (AEs). During the study period, 278 participants underwent 1,004 flexible sigmoidoscopies with the collection of 15,930 rectal biopsies. The average number of procedures per participant was 3.6 (median 3; range 1-25), with an average time interval between procedures of 61.8 days (median 28 days; range 1-1,159). There were no serious AEs. Sixteen AEs were related to flexible sigmoidoscopy and occurred in 16 participants, leading to an overall 1.6% (16/1,004) AE rate per procedure and 0.1% (16/15,930) AE rate per biopsy. Of the 16 AEs, 8 (50%) involved abdominal pain, diarrhea, bleeding, flatulence, and bloating, with an average duration of 4.7 days (median 1 day; range 1-28). Most (14/16) AEs were categorized as Grade 1 (mild), whereas two of the AEs were Grade 2 (moderate). No participant withdrew due to procedure-related AEs. Overall, the number of AEs caused by flexible sigmoidoscopy with multiple biopsies was low and the severity was mild, suggesting that this procedure can be safely integrated into protocols requiring repeated intestinal mucosal sampling.

Rectal use of a 1% tenofovir (TFV) gel is currently being evaluated for HIV prevention. While careful assessment of mucosal safety of candidate microbicides is a primary concern, tools to assess mucosal toxicity are limited. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics is a sensitive and high-throughput technique that can provide in-depth information on inflammation processes in biological systems. In this study, we utilized a proteomics approach to characterize mucosal responses in study participants involved in a phase 1 clinical trial of a rectal TFV-based gel. Project Gel was a phase 1 randomized (1:1), double-blind, multisite, placebo-controlled trial in which 24 participants received rectal TFV or a universal placebo [hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC)] over a course of 8 daily doses. Rectal mucosal swabs were collected after 0, 1, and 8 doses and were analyzed by label-free tandem mass spectrometry. Differential protein expression was evaluated using a combination of paired (time-effects) and unpaired (across study arm) t-tests, and multivariate [least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO)] modeling. Within the TFV arm, 7% (17/249, p < .05) and 10% (25/249, p < .05) of total proteins changed after 1 and 8 daily applications of TFV gel, respectively, compared to 3% (7/249, p < .05) and 6% (16/249, p < .05) in the HEC arm. Biofunctional analysis associated TFV use with a decrease in epidermal barrier proteins (adj. p = 1.21 × 10 -10 ). Multivariate modeling identified 13 proteins that confidently separated TFV gel users (100% calibration and 96% cross-validation accuracy), including the epithelial integrity factors (FLMNB, CRNN, CALM), serpins (SPB13, SPB5), and cytoskeletal proteins (VILI, VIME, WRD1). This study suggested that daily rectal applications of a 1% TFV gel may be associated with mucosal proteome changes involving epidermal development. Further assessment of more extended use of TFV-gel is recommended to validate these initial associations., Competing Interests: Author Disclosure Statement No competing financial interests exist.

The ex vivo mucosal explant model is frequently used to test the efficacy of microbicides that have the potential for preventing HIV-1 transmission. The conventional assessment of product efficacy has been the extent of HIV-1 p24 suppression in supernatant fluids sampled up to day 14 after HIV-1 challenge ex vivo. The purpose of this study was to determine if measurement of HIV-1 nucleic acids by real-time PCR and HIV-1 integration by Alu-gag PCR provides advantages with regard to monitoring HIV-1 infection in explants. Rectal biopsies from HIV-1-negative individuals were challenged with 1 × 10(5) virions/ml of HIV-1BaL or HIV-1CH077 ex vivo. HIV-1 RNA and HIV-1 p24 in supernatant fluids and HIV-1 nucleic acids and integrated provirus in individual biopsies were measured at days 1-14 after infection. HIV-1 RNA and proviral DNA were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) while integrated virus was detected by Alu-gag PCR. Real-time PCR assays detecting HIV-1 DNA and RNA performed similarly provided that the infecting virus sequences were a good match with the sequences of the assay primers and probes. Increased HIV-1 nucleic acid levels and DNA integration were measurable on days 11 and 14 after infection. The magnitude of explant infection was similar after challenge with HIV-1BaL and HIV-1CH077, although the trajectory of infection was delayed in the HIV-1CH077-infected biopsies. In the majority of experiments, qRT-PCR did not appreciably shorten the time necessary to detect evidence of HIV-1 infection.

Dapivirine (DPV) is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with a favorable safety profile following vaginal application. A penile tolerance study was conducted prior to further development of DPV as a candidate vaginal microbicide. Twenty-four circumcised and 24 uncircumcised (N=48) healthy HIV-negative male participants aged 18 years or older were randomized 2:1:1 to apply DPV 0.05% gel, matched placebo gel, or universal placebo gel, respectively, to their penis once daily for 7 sequential days. The safety, acceptability, and pharmacokinetic profile of DPV 0.05% gel were assessed by the presence of Grade 2 or higher genitourinary adverse events (AEs) and systemic AEs, a behavioral questionnaire, and pharmacokinetic plasma blood draw, respectively, at the final clinic visit (FCV). There were no Grade 2 genitourinary AEs in 47 participants completing the FCV. One participant in the DPV arm failed to attend the FCV. There were 13 AEs reported; all were Grade 1 except one Grade 2 corneal laceration unrelated to study product. Participants liked the gel to a moderate extent, yet 72% reported they would be "very likely" to use a gel like the one they used in the study every time they have intercourse. DPV was detectable in plasma in all 23 DPV arm study participants at the FCV. On average, the circumcised participants' DPV concentrations were 54% of those in uncircumcised participants (p=0.07). Topical seven-day penile application of DPV 0.05% gel was locally and systemically safe, was acceptable to male participants, and resulted in systemic exposure to the drug.

This study was designed to assess the safety, acceptability, pharmacokinetic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to rectal administration of tenofovir (TFV) 1% vaginally formulated gel and oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). This study was designed as a phase 1, randomized, two-site (United States), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of sexually abstinent men and women. Eighteen participants received a single 300-mg exposure of oral TDF and were then randomized 2:1 to receive a single and then seven daily exposures of rectal TFV or hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC) placebo gel. Safety endpoints included clinical adverse events (AEs) and mucosal safety parameters. Blood and colonic biopsies were collected for PK analyses and ex vivo HIV-1 challenge. No serious AEs were reported. However, AEs were significantly increased with 7-day TFV gel use, most prominently with gastrointestinal AEs (p=0.002). Only 25% of participants liked the TFV gel. Likelihood of use "if somewhat protective" was ∼75% in both groups. Indices of mucosal damage showed minimal changes. Tissue TFV diphosphate (TFV-DP) C(max) 30 min after single rectal exposure was 6-10 times greater than single oral exposure; tissue TFV-DP was 5.7 times greater following 7-day versus single rectal exposure. In vivo exposure correlated with significant ex vivo tissue infectibility suppression [single-rectal: p=0.12, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) p=0.006; 7-day rectal: p=0.02, ANCOVA p=0.005]. Tissue PK-PD was significantly correlated (p=0.002). We conclude that rectal dosing with TFV 1% gel resulted in greater TFV-DP tissue detection than oral dosing with reduced ex vivo biopsy infectibility, enabling PK-PD correlations. On the basis of increased gastrointestinal AEs, rectally applied, vaginally formulated TFV was not entirely safe or acceptable, suggesting the need for alternative rectal-specific formulations.