Search

Brazilian registries have shown a gap between evidence-based therapies and real treatments. We aim to compare the use of the pharmacoinvasive strategy and mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) transferred pre- and post-chest pain protocol with access to telemedicine (CPPT) in a private hospital network.A CPPT was implemented in 22 private emergency departments in 2012. Emergency physicians and nurses of all facilities were trained to disseminate the information to comply with a chest pain protocol focusing on reperfusion therapy (pharmacoinvasive strategy) for STEMI. To conduct clinical discussions using telemedicine, a cardiologist from a reference hospital in cardiology (RHC) was available 24 h/day, 7 days/week. Using the database of all consecutive admissions, we compared the data of patients with STEMI transferred to the RHC in 2011 (pre-CPPT) and 2013-2014 (post-CPPT).We included 376 patients (113 pre-CPPT and 263 post-CPPT) with STEMI. All patients admitted in the RHC were transferred from the 22 emergency departments. Comparing pre-CPPT and post-CPPT, we did not find differences regarding age, gender, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking, previous myocardial infarction, or Killip classification. However, the use of CPPT was associated with a greater use of pharmacoinvasive strategy (55.8% versus 38%; p = 0.002) and a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality (3% versus 8%; p = 0.06).The implementation of a CPPT was associated with a significant increase in the use of pharmacoinvasive strategy in patients with STEMI and a trend toward reduced in-hospital mortality in a private hospital network.