Search

This research is primarily focused on utilizing available airborne LiDAR data and spatial data from the OpenStreetMap (OSM) database to generate 3D models of buildings for a large-scale urban area. The city center of Ljubljana, Slovenia, was selected for the study area due to data availability and diversity of building shapes, heights, and functions, which presented a challenge for the automated generation of 3D models. To extract building heights, a range of data sources were utilized, including OSM attribute data, as well as georeferenced and classified point clouds and a digital elevation model (DEM) obtained from openly available LiDAR survey data of the Slovenian Environment Agency. A digital surface model (DSM) and digital terrain model (DTM) were derived from the processed LiDAR data. Building outlines and attributes were extracted from OSM and processed using QGIS. Spatial coverage of OSM data for buildings in the study area is excellent, whereas only 18% have attributes describing external appearance of the building and 6% describing roof type. LASTools software (rapidlasso GmbH, Friedrichshafener Straße 1, 82205 Gilching, GERMANY) was used to derive and assign building heights from 3D coordinates of the segmented point clouds. Various software options for procedural modeling were compared and Blender was selected due to the ability to process OSM data, availability of documentation, and low computing requirements. Using procedural modeling, a 3D model with level of detail (LOD) 1 was created fully automated. After analyzing roof types, a 3D model with LOD2 was created fully automated for 87.64% of buildings. For the remaining buildings, a comparison of procedural roof modeling and manual roof editing was performed. Finally, a visual comparison between the resulting 3D model and Google Earth's model was performed. The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the efficient modeling process using open data and free software and resulting in an enhanced accuracy of the 3D building models compared to previous LOD2 iterations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Due to financial or administrative constraints, access to official spatial base data is currently limited to a small subset of all potential users in the field of spatial planning and research. This increases the usefulness of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI), in particular OpenStreetMap (OSM), as supplementary datasets or, in some cases, alternative sources of primary data. In contrast to the OSM street network, which has already been thoroughly investigated and found to be practically complete in many areas, the degree of completeness of OSM data on buildings is still unclear. In this paper we describe methods to analyze building completeness and apply these to various test areas in Germany. Official data from national mapping and cadastral agencies is used as a basis for comparison. The results show that unit-based completeness measurements (e.g., total number or area of buildings) are highly sensitive to disparities in modeling between official data and VGI. Therefore, we recommend object-based methods to study the completeness of OSM building footprint data. An analysis from November 2011 in Germany indicated a completeness of 25% in the federal states of North Rhine-Westphalia and 15% in Saxony. Although further analyses from 2012 confirm that data completeness in Saxony has risen to 23%, the rate of new data input was slowing in the year 2012. OPEN ACCESS [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]