Search

Precise Point Positioning (PPP), coupled with the ambiguity resolution (AR) method, has demonstrated substantial potential in fields like agricultural navigation and airborne mapping. However, there remains a notable deficiency in the comprehensive comparative evaluation of its performance when using rapid and real-time satellite products, especially for mass low-cost receivers. Stations equipped with geodetic and low-cost receivers are analyzed in kinematic and static mode. In the kinematic mode, the GPS+Galileo-combined PPP, employing ambiguity fixing with "WHU" rapid products, achieves the highest positioning accuracy of 0.9 cm, 0.9 cm, and 2.6 cm in the North, East, and Up components, respectively. Real-time PPP using "CNT" products attains accuracies of 2.1 cm, 2.7 cm, and 4.8 cm for these components, utilizing GPS ambiguity-fixed PPP. BDS positioning accuracy is inferior to standalone GPS, but improves when the number of visible BDS satellites exceeds 10. Convergence time analysis shows that approximately 38.2 min are required for single GPS or BDS PPP using the "WHU" products and geodetic receivers, which can be reduced to 18.5 min for dual-system combinations and further to 14.8 min for triple-system combinations. The time can be further reduced by ambiguity fixing. In the static mode, multi-GNSS combination does not significantly impact convergence times, which are more influenced by the precision of the products used. Real-time products require approximately 22 min to achieve horizontal accuracy below 0.1 m, while rapid products reach this accuracy within 10 min. For PPP using low-cost GNSS receivers, more than two hours are necessary to achieve an accuracy better than 0.1 m for kinematic PPP, which is considerably longer than the convergence time observed at MGEX stations. However, the accuracy achieved after convergence, as well as the performance of static PPP, is comparable to that of MGEX stations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the global service of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), the Galileo Navigation Satellite System (Galileo), and the modernization of the Global Positioning System (GPS), achieving high-precision positioning through triple-frequency-only observations in medium baseline real-time kinematics (RTK) is anticipated. This study investigates the impacts of double-difference (DD) troposphere delay and ionosphere delay on ambiguity resolution (AR) based on six medium baselines at a latitude of 30°. Additionally, it evaluates positioning accuracy, fixing rate, convergence time, and computational time using triple-frequency-only (B1I/B2a/B3I, E1/E5a/E5b, L1/L2/L5) data, comparing these results to those obtained from dual-frequency (B1I/B2a, E1/E5a, L1/L2) and combined dual-frequency and triple-frequency data. The experimental findings suggest that, for geometry-based wide-lane (WL) AR, the DD troposphere delay and ionosphere delay can be disregarded. However, they cannot be overlooked when aiming to resolve the raw ambiguity. Triple-frequency-only RTK exhibits comparable positioning accuracy to dual-frequency RTK, with its primary advantage lying in faster convergence. The probability of achieving convergence within 180 s is approximately 8.0% higher for triple-frequency-only RTK compared to dual-frequency RTK. In terms of computational time, the use of triple-frequency-only data reduces the required time by 8.26 s compared to the approach that simultaneously employs both dual-frequency and triple-frequency data, resulting in a computational time reduction of approximately 20%. Therefore, when conducting medium baseline RTK positioning, it is recommended to adopt the ambiguity resolution method proposed in this paper based on triple-frequency-only observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Real-Time (RT) Precise Point Positioning (PPP) uses precise satellite orbits and clock corrections, and employs a separate receiver for positioning. With the growing demand, RT PPP is becoming an increasingly popular research topic. The ambiguity resolution (AR) can significantly improve the positioning accuracy and convergence time of PPP, so it is essential to study PPPAR in RT mode. In this paper, 37 MGEX stations from around the world are chosen, and the RT orbit, clock, and phase biases products broadcast by the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) are applied to PPPAR. Additionally, the residuals of the RT phase biases products, convergence time, and positioning accuracy are investigated. The results indicate that GPS products have the best quality of AR, with wide-lane (WL) and narrow-lane (NL) residuals of 98.9% and 95.3%, respectively, within ±0.25 cycles. Within ±0.25 cycles, the WL and NL residuals of the Galileo are 98.2% and 94.3%, respectively. Within ±0.25 cycles, the (Beidou Navigation Satellite System) BDS has a poor quality of AR, with WL and NL residuals of 97.3% and 73.1%, respectively. Due to the poor quality of the BDS AR, the convergence time of the BDS is not calculated in this paper. The convergence time of other systems is significantly reduced after AR processing, and the convergence time of the GPS/Galileo combination is the fastest, being 17.14 min in kinematic mode and only 11.85 min in static mode. The positioning accuracy of the GPS, Galileo, GPS/Galileo, and GPS/Galileo/BDS in the E and U directions is significantly improved after PPPAR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, there are two main methods for single-epoch decimeter-level precise point positioning (PPP); one is a model based on ambiguity-fixed ionosphere-free (AFIF) observations, and the other is based on uncombined (UC) PPP. The implementation of these two models requires both extra-wide-lane (EWL) and wide-lane (WL) ambiguity fixing. Different from the existing methods, this paper proposes a multi-frequency ionosphere-reduced (IR) PPP model suitable for single-epoch decimeter-level positioning. Based on Galileo five-frequency data, the optimal selection strategy of IR combinations is first studied with ionosphere, noise level and wavelength factors considered. Then, based on the selected IR combination, two IR PPP models, namely IR(EST) and IR(IGN), are established according to whether ionosphere parameters are estimated or ignored. Finally, the proposed models are verified with real tracked data from globally distributed stations, and further compared with the existing AFIF/UC models in terms of positioning performance and time consumption. The relationship between the ionosphere equivalent ranging error and satellite elevation in the IR models is analyzed. The lower the elevation is, the larger the residual ranging error is, and its impact on positioning is weakened by downweighting its observations and adjusting the cut-off elevation during the partial ambiguity fixing (PAF) process. The results show that the performance of the two IR models is basically the same, and both can achieve horizontal and vertical accuracies better than 20 cm and 40 cm, respectively. Compared with the existing AFIF/UC models, the proposed IR models can achieve similar decimeter-level accuracy with only one step of EWL ambiguity fixing, and at the same time, the IR models have varying degrees of improvement in time consumption: 38% shorter than the AFIF model and 97% shorter than the UC model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the classic Precise Point Positioning (PPP) approach, observations of Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) are processed at the network level to generate satellite clocks and positions. This information can be used to enable accurate point positioning for a single GNSS receiver. In the PPP Real-Time Kinematic (PPP-RTK) approach, satellite phase biases are considered as well, enabling ambiguity resolution at the network and user levels. In this research, 30 s multi-frequency raw GPS, Galileo, and BDS-2/3 observations are processed at the network and user levels in a sequential Kalman filter. PPP-RTK enabling products are generated for up to five frequencies, and ambiguity resolution is performed at the network and user levels using a flexible ambiguity reparameterization approach, comparable to wide- and narrow-laning, which has shown to yield a significantly improved single epoch coordinate solution when multi-frequency observations are available. Different assumptions regarding the time stability of receiver and satellite phase biases have been made and compared. The availability of a precise user coordinate solution when multi-frequency and dual-frequency observations are processed is assessed and compared. A precise ambiguity-fixed solution is available in three epochs or fewer in 77% of all cases with an average of 24 visible satellites for static and kinematic receivers when multi-frequency observations are processed. When only dual-frequency observations are considered, a fixed solution is available in seven epochs or fewer in 71% of all cases. The fastest fixed solution was found in two epochs with multi-frequency observations and in six epochs with dual-frequency observations. Estimating a reference phase clock did not lead to an improvement in the coordinate solution. The findings indicate that a fixed solution can potentially be found faster than often suggested, with potential for further improvement when more satellites or regional atmospheric corrections are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Numerous organizations and Analysis Centers (AC) currently offer various Ambiguity Resolution (AR) products using various methodologies. However, there are no associated studies on their use for time-frequency transfer. This paper examines 16 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations with external high-precision atomic clocks to constitute 15 international time comparison links, and uses AR products data from CNES, SGG, CODE, and PRIDE laboratories, using three ambiguity-fixed strategies, to thoroughly evaluate the effects of various strategies and AR products for high-precision time-frequency transfer. We reach the following results by using the IGS final clock product as a reference and comparing it to ambiguity-float. With various ambiguity-fixed procedures, the time stability Standard Deviation (STD) of time transfer is increased for a single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 10 to 40%. The frequency stability has barely improved; up to 40%, the most notable improvement comes from FCB with GRM products. The time stability STD of combinations has improved after the addition of the Galileo system compared to the single GPS, and the improvement ranges from 2 to 9%. Most strategies have been improved, while a few techniques have been weakened with the GEC (GPS + Galileo + BDS) combination. We feel that the stability has not significantly increased with the systems' increase in terms of short-term stability after comparing multiple groups of linkages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ambiguity resolution (AR) is a core technology that helps to speed up convergence time and increase positioning accuracy for precise point positioning (PPP), and the performance of PPP-AR is based on the quality of ambiguity resolution products. Real-time PPP-AR becomes a reality as users can now obtain publicly accessible real-time observable-specific signal bias (OSB) products from the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). Therefore, an analysis of the quality of OSB products and an evaluation of the performance of PPP-AR are required to promote the application of real-time positioning. For a total of 31 days between day of year (DOY) 121 and 151 in 2021, observation data were collected from 90 stations, and the OSB products were used to assess the experiments. As for the quality of the OSB products, the data availability (DA) of the GPS and Galileo satellites was greater than 97%, whereas that of BDS was less than 60%; the maximum fluctuation value (MAX) and standard deviation (STD) of the GPS, Galileo, and BDS satellites were 0.045 and 0.012; 0.081 and 0.028; and 0.292 and 0.085 cycles, respectively. In terms of ambiguity residuals using the OSB products, the wide-lane (WL) residual percentages within ±0.25 cycles for the GPS, Galileo, BDS-2, and BDS-3 systems were more than 92%, and the narrow-lane (NL) residual percentages within ±0.25 cycles for the four systems were 92%, 89%, 79%, and 60%, respectively. With regard to the performance of PPP-AR, the GPS+Galileo solution showed the best performance in the kinematic positioning mode, in which the mean root mean square (RMS) of positioning accuracy was 1.06, 1.27, and 2.85 cm for the east (E), north (N), and up (U) components, respectively, and the mean convergence time reached 9.6 min. In the static positioning mode, the mean convergence times of the GPS-only and GPS+Galileo solutions were 11.4 min and 8.0 min, respectively, and both of their mean RMS for positioning accuracy reached 0.79, 0.95, and 1.48 cm for the E, N, and U components, respectively. However, the addition of BDS did not further enhance the performance of multi-GNSS PPP-AR in either the kinematic or static positioning mode due to the poor quality of the real-time BDS products. More importantly, a prediction method was proposed to avoid re-convergence and to enhance the reliability of PPP-AR in the event of short-time missing real-time OSB products and to improve the positioning accuracy and the ambiguity fixed rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapid and accurate ambiguity resolution is the core of high-precision precise point positioning (PPP) data processing. However, the ambiguity parameters in PPP observation models are easily affected by atmospheric residual and gross errors, which lead to the probability of successfully fixing decreases and computational burden increases in full ambiguity resolution. Therefore, an increasing number of partial ambiguity resolution (PAR) strategies have been proposed. The selection of the optimal subset of PAR is crucial in this method. The traditional optimal subset selection method of PAR commonly leads to a single judgment criterion and weakened geometric configuration strength because the satellites with low elevation angles are often easily eliminated during the optimal subset selection. In this paper, a multi-factor constrained optimal subset selection method for PAR was proposed, which incorporates the ambiguity variance, the ambiguity dilution of precision (ADOP), satellite position dilution of precision (PDOP) and ratio test values. In order to verify the feasibility of the proposed optimal subset selection method, PAR tests under two schemes were performed for GPS/Galileo based on the static observation data of 15 Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) tracking stations. The results show that, compared with the ambiguity variance sorting method, the proposed subset selection method can further improve the accuracy of the coordinate solution and the strength of geometric figure positioning. The average root mean square of the coordinate residuals is found to decrease by about 12.90%, 6.83% and 9.39% in the eastern, northern and vertical directions, respectively. The increase in the fixed epoch rate ranged from 0.87% to 33.33%, with an average of about 8.71%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Galileo can independently provide navigation and positioning services globally. Galileo satellites transmit quad-frequency E1, E5a, E5b, and E5 signals, which can benefit the integer ambiguity rapid resolution. Firstly, the qualities of Galileo signals from Carrier-to-Noise (C/N0), Multipath Combination (MPC), and pseudo-range and phase noise using the ultra-short baseline were evaluated. The experimental results indicated that the Galileo E5 signal has the highest C/N0, while the C/N0 of other signals is lower and almost equal. In terms of MPC, the Galileo E1 was the most severe followed by E5a and E5b, and the MPC of E5 is less severe. As for the precision of un-differenced observations, the carrier phase and pseudo-range observations of Galileo E5 had higher accuracy than those of Galileo E5a, E5b, and E1. Secondly, the quad-frequency observations allowed for various linear combinations of different frequencies, which provides some feasibility for improving the performance of ambiguity resolution. Assuming that the phase noise σ ∇ Δ Φ   =   0. 01   m and the first-order ionosphere σ ∇ Δ I 1   =   1   m , the total noise of the Extra-Wide-Lane (EWL) combination observation ((0, 0, 1, −1) and (0, −1, 1, 0)) and Very-Wide-Lane (VWL) combination observation ((0, −2, 1, 1), (0, −3, 2, 1)) are still less than 0.5 cycles. Finally, a geometry-based quad-frequency carrier ambiguities (GB-QCAR) method was developed, and all different options of linear combinations were investigated systematically from the ambiguity-fixed rate with two baselines. Experimental results demonstrated that, the ambiguity fixed rate of combination observation (0, −1, 1, 0), (0, −3, 5, −2), (1, −1, 0, 0) and (0, 0, 0, 1) is the highest and the positioning accuracy of VWL combination observation (0, −3, 5, −2) is equivalent to that of the EWL combination observation (0, −1, 1, 0). The positioning accuracies of WL combination observation (1, −1, 0, 0) are preferable to 3 cm and 10 cm in the horizontal and vertical, respectively. The positioning accuracy of NL combination observation E5 in the horizontal direction is about 1 cm, and is better than 4 cm in the vertical direction. Therefore, we can use Galileo observations to realize high-precise navigation services utilizing the proposed GB-QCAR method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ambiguity resolution at Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) network sites is the key step in the whole processing chain of Network Real Time Kinematic (NRTK). An appropriate ambiguity-resolution speed is important, and single-epoch ambiguity resolution has not been realized yet, especially for large-scale CORS. We attempt to realize single-epoch ambiguity resolution for a large-scale CORS network by neglecting tropospheric delay through forming difference between satellites with close mapping functions whether they belong to the same or different GNSSs. As only two frequency bands are shared among GPS, Galileo and BeiDou, the biggest challenge is how to get this single-epoch ambiguity solution for wide-lane combinations of L1 and L5 when the difference is formed between satellites of different GNSSs. The proposed method includes five steps for ambiguity resolution for different combinations: extra wide-lane, wide-lane, inter-GNSS wide-lane, subset narrow-lane and narrow-lane. The single-epoch ambiguity-resolution performance is assessed based on GNSS observations from two long-distance baselines formed with IGS stations, BRUX-REDU and BAUT-LEIJ, separated by distances of approximately 104 km and 151 km, respectively. The numerical results show that the fixing rate of the single-epoch ambiguity resolution can reach more than 90%, so for a large-scale CORS network, single-epoch ambiguity resolution is feasible and can be realized in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stochastic models play a crucial role in global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) data processing. Many studies contribute to the stochastic modeling of GNSS observation noise, whereas few studies focus on the stochastic modeling of process noise. This paper proposes a method that is able to jointly estimate the variances of observation noise and process noise. The method is flexible since it is based on the least-squares variance component estimation (LS-VCE), enabling users to estimate the variance components that they are specifically interested in. We apply the proposed method to estimate the variances for the dual-frequency GNSS observation noise and for the process noise of the receiver code bias (RCB). We also investigate the impact of the stochastic model upon parameter estimation, ambiguity resolution, and positioning. The results show that the precision of GNSS observations differs in systems and frequencies. Among the dual-frequency GPS, Galileo, and BDS code observations, the precision of the BDS B3 observations is highest (better than 0.2 m). The precision of the BDS phase observations is better than two millimeters, which is also higher than that of the GPS and Galileo observations. For all three systems, the RCB process noise ranges from 0.5 millimeters to 1 millimeter, with a data sampling rate of 30 s. An improper stochastic model of the observation noise results in an unreliable ambiguity dilution of precision (ADOP) and position dilution of precision (PDOP), thus adversely affecting the assessment of the ambiguity resolution and positioning performance. An inappropriate stochastic model of RCB process noise disturbs the estimation of the receiver clock and the ionosphere delays and is thus harmful for timing and ionosphere retrieval applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

From network RTK to PPP-RTK, it is highly expected that high-precision positioning within a few minutes can be achieved with a sparse reference network. In this study, we investigate a rapid multi-frequency PPP convergence strategy based on Galileo E1/E5a/E6 and BeiDou-3 B1C/B2a/B3I signals, whose unambiguous wide-lane observables can efficiently assist in speeding up narrow-lane ambiguity resolution. Furthermore, frequency-specific biases existing on the third-frequency observables have been observed to slow down multi-frequency PPP-AR convergence. In this study, we partially mitigated their effects by estimating a second satellite clock for the third frequency of signals. We validated this approach with one month of data collected from 22 stations. On average, it took about 18 min for PPP wide-lane ambiguity resolution (PPP-WAR) to converge, while 32 min were required for ambiguity-float PPP. Compared with dual-frequency PPP-AR, which needed nearly 12 min to converge, multi-frequency PPP-AR required 6 min only. Once there were more than 10 satellites involved in PPP, the convergence could be achieved within 3 min on average. Meanwhile, 81% and 62% of multi-frequency PPP-AR solutions converged successfully within 5 and 1 min, respectively. Finally, we carried out a vehicle-borne experiment to validate this approach in a kinematic environment. Owing to frequent cycle slips during the movement of vehicle, it took 14 min for B1C/B2a/B3I and E1/E5a/E6 PPP-AR to obtain reliable positions, and 19 min for those using the other signal combinations B1C/B2a/B2b and E1/E5a/E5b, owning to higher noise. Overall, these results are promising for achieving high-precision PPP positioning globally within a few minutes if multi-frequency biases can be handled well in the data processing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precise Point Positioning (PPP), as a global precise positioning technique, suffers from relatively long convergence times, hindering its ability to be the default precise positioning technique. Reducing the PPP convergence time is a must to reach global precise positions, and doing so in a few minutes to seconds can be achieved thanks to the additional frequencies that are being broadcast by the modernized GNSS constellations. Due to discrepancies in the number of signals broadcast by each satellite/constellation, it is necessary to have a model that can process a mix of signals, depending on availability, and perform ambiguity resolution (AR), a technique that proved necessary for rapid convergence. This manuscript does so by expanding the uncombined Decoupled Clock Model to process and fix ambiguities on up to three frequencies depending on availability for GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou. GLONASS is included as well, without carrier-phase ambiguity fixing. Results show the possibility of consistent quasi-instantaneous global precise positioning through an assessment of the algorithm on a network of global stations, as the 67th percentile solution converges below 10 cm horizontal error within 2 min, compared to 8 min with a triple-frequency solution, showing the importance of having a flexible PPP-AR model frequency-wise. In terms of individual datasets, 14% of datasets converge instantaneously when mixing dual- and triple-frequency measurements, compared to just 0.1% in that of dual-frequency mode without ambiguity resolution. Two kinematic car datasets were also processed, and it was shown that instantaneous centimetre-level positioning with a moving receiver is possible. These results are promising as they only rely on ultra-rapid global satellite products, allowing for instantaneous real-time precise positioning without the need for any local infrastructure or prior knowledge of the receiver's environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper presents a precise and fast method of ambiguity resolution (PREFMAR) for frequencies L1/E1 and L5/E5a of GPS/GALILEO data. The developed method is designed for precise and fast determination of ambiguities in GNSS phase observations. Ambiguities are chosen based on mathematical search functions. The fact that no variance–covariance matrix (VC matrix) with a so-called float solution is needed proves the innovativeness of the developed method. The developed method enables determination of the ambiguities for short baseline double-difference (DD) observations. The presented algorithms for the developed method enable unique and reliable calculation of the ambiguity if the actual errors of code measurements of DD observations are less than 0.38 m and the relative errors of phase observations are in the range of ±3 cm. The paper presents both mathematical derivations of the functions used in the PREFMAR and numerical calculations based on real double-difference GPS observations (L1-L5). The elaborated algorithms can be easily implemented into GNSS receivers or mobile phones. Therefore, they can be widely used in many geoscience applications, as well as in precise GPS/GALILEO navigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this study, an uncombined precise point positioning (PPP) model was established and was used for estimating fractional cycle bias (FCB) products and for achieving ambiguity resolution (AR), using GPS, BDS-2, and Galileo raw observations. The uncombined PPP model is flexible and efficient for positioning services and generating FCB. The FCBs for GPS, BDS-2, and Galileo were estimated using the uncombined PPP model with observations from the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) stations. The root mean squares (RMSs) of the float ambiguity a posteriori residuals associated with all of the three GNSS constellations, i.e., GPS, BDS-2, and Galileo, are less than 0.1 cycles for both narrow-lane (NL) and wide-lane (WL) combinations. The standard deviation (STD) of the WL combination FCB series is 0.015, 0.013, and 0.006 cycles for GPS, BDS-2, and Galileo, respectively, and the counterpart for the NL combination FCB series is 0.030 and 0.0184 cycles for GPS and Galileo, respectively. For the BDS-2 NL combination FCB series, the STD of the inclined geosynchronous orbit (IGSO) satellites is 0.0156 cycles, while the value for the medium Earth orbit (MEO) satellites is 0.073 cycles. The AR solutions produced by the uncombined multi-GNSS PPP model were evaluated from the positioning biases and the success fixing rate of ambiguity. The experimental results demonstrate that the growth of the amount of available satellites significantly improves the PPP performance. The three-dimensional (3D) positioning accuracies associated with the PPP ambiguity-fixed solutions for the respective only-GPS, GPS/BDS-2, GPS/Galileo, and GPS/BDS-2/Galileo models are 1.34, 1.19, 1.21, and 1.14 cm, respectively, and more than a 30% improvement is achieved when compared to the results related to the ambiguity-float solutions. Additionally, the convergence time based on the GPS/BDS-2/Galileo observations is only 7.5 min for the ambiguity-fixed solutions, and the results exhibit a 53% improvement in comparison to the ambiguity-float solutions. The values of convergence time based on the only-GPS observations are estimated as 22 and 10.5 min for the ambiguity-float and ambiguity-fixed solutions, respectively. Lastly, the success fixing rate of ambiguity is also dramatically raised for the multi-GNSS PPP AR. For example, the percentage is approximately 99% for the GPS/BDS-2/Galileo solution over a 10 min processing period. In addition, the inter-system bias (ISB) between GPS, BDS-2, and Galileo, which is carefully considered in the uncombined multi-GNSS PPP method, is modeled as a white noise process. The differences of the ISB series between BDS-2 and Galileo indicate that the clock datum bias of the satellite clock offset estimation accounts for the variation of the ISB series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapid precise point positioning ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) is of great importance to improving precise positioning efficiency. There is an expectation that Galileo multi-frequency (three or more frequencies) data processing will offer a promising way to accelerate PPP-AR. However, the performance of different combination observables out of raw Galileo multi-frequency data is still unclear, and the adverse impacts of missing receiver antenna phase center corrections have not been quantified in detail. We therefore studied uncombined Galileo PPP-AR by contrasting three typical triple-frequency combinations, which are E1/E5a/E5b, E1/E5a/E6, and E1/E5/E6 signals, using 30 days of data from 15 stations across Australia. We carried out triple-frequency PPP-AR by separately applying the official GPS receiver antenna phase centers, as currently employed in most relevant literatures, as well as the pilot Galileo receiver antenna phase centers preliminarily measured by the International GNSS Service. We found that, compared to dual-frequency (E1/E5a) PPP-AR, triple-frequency PPP-AR based on E1/E5a/E5b signals shortened the convergence time by only 7.6%, while those based on E1/E5a/E6 and E1/E5/E6 increased unexpectedly the convergence time by 17.6% and 12.7%, respectively, if the GPS receiver antenna corrections were presumed for Galileo signals. However, after using the pilot Galileo phase center corrections, triple-frequency PPP-AR based on E1/E5a/E5b, E1/E5a/E6, and E1/E5/E6 signals could speed up the convergence on average by about 16.2%, 30.3%, and 17.7%, respectively. Therefore, we demonstrate the critical impact of correct Galileo receiver antenna phase centers on multi-frequency PPP-AR convergences. Moreover, the triple-frequency signal combination E1/E5a/E6 is advantageous over others in achieving rapid triple-frequency Galileo PPP-AR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-frequency and multi-GNSS integration is currently becoming an important trend in the development of satellite navigation and positioning technology. In this paper, GPS/Galileo/BeiDou (BDS) precise point positioning (PPP) with ambiguity resolution (AR) are discussed in detail. The mathematical model of triple-system PPP AR and the principle of fractional cycle bias (FCB) estimation are firstly described. With the data of 160 stations in Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) from day of year (DOY) 321-350, 2018, the FCBs of the three systems are estimated and the experimental results show that the range of most GPS wide-lane (WL) FCB is within 0.1 cycles during one month, while that of Galileo WL FCB is 0.05 cycles. For BDS FCB, the classification estimation method is used to estimate the BDS FCB and divide it into GEO and non-GEO (IGSO and MEO) FCB. The variation range of BDS GEO WL FCB can reach 0.5 cycles, while BDS non-GEO WL FCB does not exceed 0.1 cycles within a month. However, the accuracies of GPS, Galileo, and BDS non-GEO narrow-lane (NL) FCB are basically the same. In addition, the number of visible satellites and Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP) values of different combined systems are analyzed and evaluated in this paper. It shows that the triple-system combination can significantly increase the number of observable satellites, optimize the spatial distribution structure of satellites, and is significantly superior to the dual-system and single-system. Finally, the positioning characteristics of single-, dual-, and triple-systems are analyzed. The results of the single station positioning experiment show that the accuracy and convergence speed of the fixed solutions for each system are better than those of the corresponding float solutions. The average root mean squares (RMSs) of the float and the fixed solution in the east and north direction for GPS/Galileo/BDS combined system are the smallest, being 0.92 cm, 0.52 cm and 0.50 cm, 0.46 cm respectively, while the accuracy of the GPS in the up direction is the highest, which is 1.44 cm and 1.27 cm, respectively. Therefore, the combined system can accelerate the convergence speed and greatly enhance the stability of the positioning results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precise point positioning (PPP) has been used for decades not only for general positioning needs but also for geodetic and other scientific applications. The CNES-CLS Analysis Centre (AC) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) is performing PPP with phase ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR) using the zero-difference ambiguity fixing approach also known as "Integer PPP" (IPPP). In this paper we examine the postprocessed kinematic PPP and PPP-AR using Galileo-only, GPS-only and Multi-GNSS (GPS + Galileo) constellations. The interest is to examine the accuracy for each GNSS system individually but also of their combination to measure the current benefits of using Galileo within a Multi-GNSS PPP and PPP-AR. Results show that Galileo-only positioning is nearly at the same level as GPS-only; around 2–4 mm horizontal and aound 10 mm vertical repeatability (example station of BRUX). In addition, the use of Galileo system—even uncompleted—improves the performance of the positioning when combined with GPS giving mm level repeatability (improvement of around 30% in East, North and Up components). Repeatabilities observed for Multi-GNSS (GPS + GAL) PPP-AR, taking into account the global network statistics, are a little larger, with 8 mm in horizontal and 17 mm in vertical directions. This result shows that including Galileo ameliorates the best positioning accuracy achieved until today with GPS PPP-AR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this contribution, we assess, for the first time, the tightly combined real-time kinematic (RTK) with GPS, Galileo, and BDS-3 operational satellites using observations from their overlapping L1-E1-B1C/L5-E5a-B2a frequencies. First, the characteristics of B1C/B2a signals from BDS-3 operational satellites is evaluated compared to GPS/Galileo L1-E1/L5-E5a signals in terms of observed carrier-to-noise density ratio, pseudorange multipath and noise, as well as double-differenced carrier phase and code residuals using data collected with scientific geodetic iGMAS and commercial M300Pro receivers. It's demonstrated that the observational quality of B1C/B2a signals from BDS-3 operational satellites is comparable to that of GPS/Galileo L1-E1/L5-E5a signals. Then, we investigate the size and stability of phase and code differential inter-system bias (ISB) between BDS-3/GPS/Galileo B1C-L1-E1/B2a-L5-E5a signals using short baseline data collected with both identical and different receiver types. It is verified that the BDS-3/GPS/Galileo ISBs are indeed close to zero when identical type of receivers are used at both ends of a baseline. Moreover, they are generally present and stable in the time domain for baselines with different receiver types, which can be easily calibrated and corrected in advance. Finally, we present initial assessment of single-epoch tightly combined BDS-3/GPS/Galileo RTK with single-frequency and dual-frequency observations using a formal and empirical analysis, consisting of ambiguity dilution of precision (ADOP), ratio values, the empirical ambiguity resolution success rate, and the positioning accuracy. Experimental results demonstrate that the tightly combined model can deliver much lower ADOP and higher ratio values with respect to the classical loosely combined model whether for GPS/BDS-3 or GPS/Galileo/BDS-3 solutions. The positioning accuracy and the empirical ambiguity resolution success rate are remarkably improved as well, which could reach up to approximately 10%∼60% under poor observational conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]