Search

Particle size inversion of dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a typically ill-posed problem. Regularization is an effective method to solve the problem. The regularization involves imposing constraints on the fitted autocorrelation function data by adding a norm. The classical regularization inversion for DLS data is constrained by the L2 norm. In the optimization equation, the norm determines the smoothness and stability of the inversion result, affecting the inversion accuracy. In this paper, the Lp norm regularization model is constructed. When p is 1, 2, 10, 50, 100, 1000, and ∞, respectively, the influence of their norm models on the inversion results of data with different noise levels is studied. The results prove that overall, the inversion distribution errors show a downward trend with the increase of p. When p is larger than 10, there is no significant difference in distribution error. Compared with L2, L∞ can provide better performance for unimodal particles with strong noise, although this does not occur in weak noise cases. Meanwhile, L∞ has lower sensitivity to noise and better peak resolution, and its inverse particle size distribution is closer to the true distribution for bimodal particles. Thus, L∞ is more suitable for the inversion of DLS data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the large inversion range, the wavelet-regularization inversion method (WRIM) is an effective method for improving the inversion accuracy of dynamic light scattering (DLS) data. However, the initial decomposition scale (IDS) of this method has a great effect on the inversion accuracy. The particle size distribution (PSD) obtained from inappropriate IDS is not optimal. We analyze the effect of the different IDS on the inversion result in this paper. The results show that IDS of the smallest relative error should be chosen as the optimal IDS. However, because the true PSD is unknown in the practical measurements, this optimal IDS criterion is infeasible. Therefore, we propose an application criterion determining the optimal IDS. Based on this criterion, an improved WRIM with the optimal IDS is established. By the improved WRIM, high accuracy inversion PSD is obtained from DLS data. The simulated and experimental data demonstrate the effectiveness of this algorithm. Besides, we also further study the effect of the data noise on the optimal IDS. These studies indicate that the optimal IDS usually shows a downward trend with an increase of noise level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) is a popular method of particle size measurement, but at ultra-low particle concentrations, the occurrence of number concentration fluctuations limits the use of the technique. Number fluctuations add a non-Gaussian term to the scattered light intensity autocorrelation function (ACF). This leads to an inaccurate particle size distribution (PSD) being recovered if the normal DLS analysis model is used. We propose two methods for inverting the DLS data and recovering the PSDs when number fluctuations are apparent. One is to directly establish the relationship between the non-Gaussian ACF and the PSD by the kernel function reconstruction (KFR) method while including the non-Gaussian term to recover the PSD. The other is to remove the effect of the non-Gaussian term in the ACF by the baseline reset (BR) method. By including the number fluctuation term, the ideal recovered PSD can be obtained from the simulated data, but this will not happen in the experimental measurement data. This is because the measured intensity ACF contains more noise than the simulated ACF at ultra-low concentration. In particular, the baseline noise at the tail of long delay time of ACF overwhelms the number fluctuation term, making it difficult to recover reliable PSD data. Resetting the baseline can effectively remove the digital fluctuation term in ACF, which is also a feasible method to improve PSD recovery under ultra-low concentration. However, increasing noise at ultra-low concentrations can lead to errors in determining an effective baseline. This greatly reduces the accuracy of inversion results. Results from simulated and measured ACF data show that, for both methods, noise on the ACF limits reliable PSD recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]