Search

Objectives: The current study aims to survey the willingness of parents to vaccinate their children, who are childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors (CALLS), and identify factors associated with vaccine acceptance. Methods: Parents of CALLS on/off treatment, with the general condition of being amendable to vaccination, were recruited for interviews with attending oncologists about COVID-19 vaccination acceptance from July to November 2021 in China. After controlling for socioeconomic factors, the Association of Oncologists' recommendations and parent–oncologist alliance with acceptance status were investigated. For validation, propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used. Results: A total of 424 families were included in the study, with CALLS mean remission age of 5.99 ± 3.40 years. Among them, 91 (21.4%) agreed, 168 (39.6%) hesitated, and 165 (38.9%) parents disagreed with the vaccination. The most common reason that kept parents from vaccinating their children was lack of recommendations from professional personnel (84/165, 50.9%), and massive amounts of internet information (78/175, 44.6%) was the main nonhealthcare resource against vaccination. Logistic regression analysis showed that only the recommendation from the oncologist was associated with parents' vaccine acceptance (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.93–5.20), as demonstrated by PSM comparison (42 in recommendation group vs. 18 in nonrecommendation group among 114 pairs, p < 0.001). An exploratory analysis revealed that parents with a better patient–oncologist alliance had a significantly higher level of acceptance (65.6% in alliance group vs. 15.6% in nonalliance group among 32 pairs, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Due to a lack of professional recommendation resources and the potential for serious consequences, parents were generally reluctant to vaccinate their CALLS. The recommendation of oncologists, which was influenced by the parent–oncologist alliance, significantly increased acceptance. This study emphasizes the critical role of oncologists in vaccinating cancer survivors and can be used to promote COVID-19 vaccines among vulnerable populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: CircKIF4A is significantly upregulated in NKTL cell lines and its upregulation correlates with the poor prognosis of NKTL. CircKIF4A regulates PDK1 and BCL11A expressions by sponging miR-1231. Our data indicated that circKIF4A is oncogenic in NKTL and that it is a predictor of poor prognosis of NKTL. Background: Natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (NKTL) is difficult to treat. Circular RNAs (circ RNAs) have been implicated in tumorigenesis. However, the function of circKIF4A in NKTL has not been investigated. Methods: QPCR analysis was used to compare circKIF4A levels in NKTL cell lines versus normal cell lines. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to assess the effect of circKIF4A on the prognosis of NKTL. The correlation between clinicopathological features and circKIF4A expression was examined using cox regression analysis. Luciferase reporter, RNA immunoprecipitation and immunohistochemistry assays were also used to investigate the mechanisms of circKIF4A in NKTL. Results: Our analyses revealed that circKIF4A is significantly upregulated in NKTL cell lines and that its upregulation correlates with the poor prognosis of NKTL. The silencing of circKIF4A significantly suppressed glucose uptake and lactate production in NKTL cells. Moreover, we showed that circKIF4A, PDK1, and BCL11A bind miR-1231 and that circKIF4A regulates PDK1 and BCL11A expressions by sponging miR-1231. Conclusions: During NKTL progression, circKIF4A regulated PDK1 and BCL11A levels by sponging miR-1231. Our data indicated that circKIF4A is oncogenic in NKTL and that it is a predictor of poor prognosis of NKTL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]