1. Osimertinib as Second- and ≥Third-Line Treatment in Advanced and Recurrence EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients Harboring Acquired T790M Mutation.
- Author
-
Peng, Mu-Han, Huang, Yen-Hsiang, Hsu, Kuo-Hsuan, Tseng, Jeng-Sen, Lee, Po-Hsin, Chen, Kun-Chieh, Chang, Gee-Chen, and Yang, Tsung-Ying
- Abstract
Simple Summary: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of osimertinib as a 2nd-line treatment versus as a ≥3rd-line treatment in advanced and recurrent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with acquired T790M mutations. A total of 158 patients who received osimertinib as sequential treatment were enrolled for final analysis between September 2014 and March 2023. Among these, 99 patients (62.7%) received osimertinib as 2nd-line treatment, while 59 patients (37.3%) were treated with it as ≥3rd-line therapy. We found no significant difference in progression-free survival or overall survival between the two groups. Our findings suggest that osimertinib is not only effective as a 2nd-line therapy but also as a ≥3rd-line treatment, offering promising clinical benefits for advanced and recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutations. Background/Objectives: Osimertinib is a standard sequential therapy for advanced and recurrent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with the T790M mutation, following treatment with first- or second-generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). This study aims to investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between osimertinib as a 2nd-line treatment and as a ≥3rd-line treatment in this patient population. Methods: Between September 2014 and March 2023, we enrolled advanced and recurrent T790M + NSCLC patients who had received osimertinib as sequential treatment for analysis. All patients had previously been treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib as first-line therapy. Results: A total of 158 patients who received osimertinib as sequential treatment were included in the final analysis. Of these, 99 patients (62.7%) received osimertinib as a 2nd-line treatment, while 59 patients (37.3%) were treated with osimertinib as ≥3rd-line therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.7 months for the 2nd-line group and 8.9 months for the ≥3rd-line group. The median overall survival (OS) from first-line treatment was 73.2 months in the 2nd-line group and 57.5 months in the ≥3rd-line group. No statistically significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between the two groups. Conclusions: Our research demonstrated that osimertinib is effective not only as a 2nd-line therapy but also as a ≥3rd-line treatment, offering promising clinical benefits for advanced and recurrent EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with acquired T790M mutations who have developed resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF