Search

Advanced MRI methods and PET using radiolabelled amino acids provide valuable information, in addition to conventional MR imaging, for brain tumour diagnostics. These methods are particularly helpful in challenging situations such as the differentiation of malignant processes from benign lesions, the identification of non-enhancing glioma subregions, the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related changes, and the early assessment of responses to anticancer therapy. The debate over which of the methods is preferable in which situation is ongoing, and has been addressed in numerous studies. Currently, most radiology and nuclear medicine departments perform these examinations independently of each other, leading to multiple examinations for the patient. The advent of hybrid PET/MRI allowed a convergence of the methods, but to date simultaneous imaging has reached little relevance in clinical neuro-oncology. This is partly due to the limited availability of hybrid PET/MRI scanners, but is also due to the fact that PET is a second-line examination in brain tumours. PET is only required in equivocal situations, and the spatial co-registration of PET examinations of the brain to previous MRI is possible without disadvantage. A key factor for the benefit of PET/MRI in neuro-oncology is a multimodal approach that provides decisive improvements in the diagnostics of brain tumours compared with a single modality. This review focuses on studies investigating the diagnostic value of combined amino acid PET and 'advanced' MRI in patients with cerebral gliomas. Available studies suggest that the combination of amino acid PET and advanced MRI improves grading and the histomolecular characterisation of newly diagnosed tumours. Few data are available concerning the delineation of tumour extent. A clear additive diagnostic value of amino acid PET and advanced MRI can be achieved regarding the differentiation of tumour recurrence from treatment-related changes. Here, the PET-guided evaluation of advanced MR methods seems to be helpful. In summary, there is growing evidence that a multimodal approach can achieve decisive improvements in the diagnostics of cerebral gliomas, for which hybrid PET/MRI offers optimal conditions.

O-(2-[ 18 F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) is a widely used amino acid tracer for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of brain tumours. This retrospective study and survey aimed to analyse our extensive database regarding the development of FET PET investigations, indications, and the referring physicians' rating concerning the role of FET PET in the clinical decision-making process. Between 2006 and 2019, we performed 6534 FET PET scans on 3928 different patients against a backdrop of growing demand for FET PET. In 2019, indications for the use of FET PET were as follows: suspected recurrent glioma (46%), unclear brain lesions (20%), treatment monitoring (19%), and suspected recurrent brain metastasis (13%). The referring physicians were neurosurgeons (60%), neurologists (19%), radiation oncologists (11%), general oncologists (3%), and other physicians (7%). Most patients travelled 50 to 75 km, but 9% travelled more than 200 km. The role of FET PET in decision-making in clinical practice was evaluated by a questionnaire consisting of 30 questions, which was filled out by 23 referring physicians with long experience in FET PET. Fifty to seventy per cent rated FET PET as being important for different aspects of the assessment of newly diagnosed gliomas, including differential diagnosis, delineation of tumour extent for biopsy guidance, and treatment planning such as surgery or radiotherapy, 95% for the diagnosis of recurrent glioma, and 68% for the diagnosis of recurrent brain metastases. Approximately 50% of the referring physicians rated FET PET as necessary for treatment monitoring in patients with glioma or brain metastases. All referring physicians stated that the availability of FET PET is essential and that it should be approved for routine use. Although the present analysis is limited by the fact that only physicians who frequently referred patients for FET PET participated in the survey, the results confirm the high relevance of FET PET in the clinical diagnosis of brain tumours and support the need for its approval for routine use.