Search

Background and Objectives: The Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification is a pragmatic distribution of nine phenotypes for coronal knee alignment that can be used on healthy and arthritic knees. Our study aimed to describe the CPAK distributions in a Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population and compare them to other populations' published alignment distributions. Method and Materials: Full-leg standing X-rays of the lower limb from 528 cases originating from the so-called Vega Alta del Segura (southeast of the Iberian Peninsula) were retrospectively analysed. We measured the mechanical hip–knee–ankle, lateral distal femoral, and medial proximal tibial angles. We calculated the arithmetic hip–knee–ankle angle and the joint line obliquity to classify each case according to the criteria of the CPAK classification. Results: Based on the aHKA result, 59.1% of the cases were varus (less than −2°), 32.7% were neutral (0° ± 2°), and 8.2% were valgus (greater than +2°). Based on the JLO result, 56.7% of the cases had a distal apex (less than 177°), 39.9% had a neutral apex (180° ± 3°), and 3.4% had a proximal apex (greater than 183°). The most common CPAK distribution in our Spanish southeast osteoarthritic population was type I (30.7%), followed by type IV (25.9%), type II (21%), type V (11.2%), type III (5%), type VI (2.8%), type VII (2.4%), type VIII (0.6%), and type IX (0.4%). Conclusions: We described the distribution according to the CPAK classification in a sample of the osteoarthritic population from southeastern Spain. In our sample, more than 75% of the patients were classified as type I, II, and IV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Cobb angle is critical in assessing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the error in selecting the upper- and lower-end vertebrae on AIS digital X-rays by experienced and novice observers and its correlation with the error in measuring the Cobb angle and determining the length of the scoliotic curves. Methods: Using the TraumaMeter v.873 software, eight raters independently evaluated 68 scoliotic curves. Results: The error percentage in the upper-end vertebra selection was higher than for the lower-end vertebra (44.7%, CI95% 41.05–48.3 compared to 35%, CI95% 29.7–40.4). The mean bias error (MBE) was 0.45 (CI95% 0.38–0.52) for the upper-end vertebra and 0.35 (CI% 0.69–0.91) for the lower-end vertebra. The percentage of errors in the choice of the end vertebrae was lower for the experienced than for the novices. There was a positive correlation (r = 0.673, p = 0.000) between the error in selecting the end vertebrae and determining the length of the scoliotic curves. Conclusions: We can conclude that errors in selecting end vertebrae are common among experienced and novice observers, with a greater error frequency for the upper-end vertebrae. Contrary to the consensus, the accuracy of determining the length of the scoliotic curve is limited by the Cobb method's reliance on the correct selection of the end vertebrae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Instability is a common cause of (total knee arthroplasty) TKA failure, which can be prevented by achieving proper gap balance during surgery. There is no consensus on the ideal gap balance in TKA, and different alignment philosophies result in varying soft-tissue tightness. Traditional TKA aims for symmetric compartment balance, while kinematic alignment (KA) restores anatomy and accepts asymmetric flexion gaps. This study evaluated the impact of these philosophies on the flexion gap balance and clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of 167 patients who received true or restricted KA robotic-assisted TKA with at least one year of follow-up was conducted. The groups were based on intraoperative flexion gap differences: symmetric (0–1 mm) (n = 94) and asymmetric (2–5 mm) (n = 73). Results: Preoperative demographics and postoperative clinical and functional scores were compared. Both groups were similar in demographics and preoperative scores. True KA alignment was more likely to result in an asymmetric flexion gap, while restricted KA produced symmetric gaps. Conclusions: The study found no adverse effects from the physiological asymmetric flexion gap, with clinical and functional outcomes comparable to symmetric gaps. A 5 mm difference between the medial and lateral gap width did not negatively impact the outcomes. True KA more frequently results in a physiological asymmetric flexion gap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Featured Application: TraumaMeter v.873 was designed to increase the accuracy of specific measurements at the spine level. The system meets the characteristics of open-source and modular functions and has been extended to perform angular measurements on lower extremity X-ray studies with high reliability. To establish classifications and to obtain pre- and post-operative information on patient-specific alignments, it is necessary to measure different angular values accurately and precisely, mainly on weight-bearing, full-length anteroposterior X-rays of the lower limbs (LLRs). This study evaluated angular measurements' validity and absolute reliability on LLRs with a self-developed, computer-aided measurement system (TraumaMeter v.873). Eight independent observers measured the preoperative mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle of 52 lower extremities (26 cases) in a blinded fashion on three occasions separated by two weeks. We obtained an intra-observer mean bias error (MBE) of 0.40°, a standard deviation (SD) of 0.11°, and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.37°–0.43°. We also obtained an inter-observer MBE of 0.49°, an SD of 0.15°, and a 95% C of 0.45°–0.53°. The intra-observer MBE for the measurement pair between the second and the first measurement round (T2T1) was 0.43°, the SD was 0.13°, and the 95% CI was 0.39°–0.47°; the MBE between the third and the second round (T3T2) was 0.37°, with an SD of 0.10° and a 95% CI of 0.34°–0.40°; and the MBE between the third and the first round (T3T1) was 0.40°, with an SD of 0.10° and a 95% CI of 0.37°–0.43°. The interobserver MBE for the first round of measurements was 0.52°, with an SD of 0.16° and a 95% CI of 0.48°–0.56°; the MBE for the second round was 0.50°, with an SD of 0.15° and a 95% CI of 0.46°–0.54°; and the MBE for the third round was 0.46°, with an SD of 0.14° and a 95% CI of 0.42°–0.50°. There were no statistically significant differences in the inter-observer errors for the three tests. In the case of the intra-observer analysis, there were differences between T2T1 and between T3T2, but these differences were minimal, with no overlaps in the lower or upper values, respectively, of the confidence intervals. These results led us to conclude that the TraumaMeter v.873 software extension for measuring lower-limb angles in LLRs is an accurate tool with low intra- and inter-observer variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ergonomics and risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders have been studied extensively in various industry fields. However, only a few decades ago, these issues became a concern in the healthcare sector. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures performed by orthopaedic surgeons, and it would be desirable to perform it with an ergonomically safer technique. This study evaluated the ergonomic risk of different surgeon positions when performing contralateral TKA using the dominant hand. After the authors defined the four possible surgeon positions according to the most common positions used by surgeons in our environment (position A, on the opposite side of the knee to be operated on; position B, on the same side as the knee to be operated on; position C, with the patient's legs separated and the surgeon standing between them; and position D, facing the knee to be operated on, at the patient's feet), we performed an ergonomic analysis using the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) method. The overall REBA scores (lower score values indicate better ergonomics than higher) were between 7 and 6.5 for position A, between 6.17 and 5.5 for position B, between 5.92 and 5.5 for position C, and between 3.75 and 3.42 for position D. The test–retest and inter-rater reliability values ranged from substantial agreement to almost perfect agreement. Based on the results, we can conclude that the most ergonomic position for a right-handed surgeon to perform a left TKA is facing the left knee, at the patient's feet (position D). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances allow the use of Augmented Reality (AR) for many medical procedures. AR via optical navigators to aid various knee surgery techniques (e.g., femoral and tibial osteotomies, ligament reconstructions or menisci transplants) is becoming increasingly frequent. Accuracy in these procedures is essential, but evaluations of this technology still need to be made. Our study aimed to evaluate the system's accuracy using an in vitro protocol. We hypothesised that the system's accuracy was equal to or less than 1 mm and 1° for distance and angular measurements, respectively. Our research was an in vitro laboratory with a 316 L steel model. Absolute reliability was assessed according to the Hopkins criteria by seven independent evaluators. Each observer measured the thirty palpation points and the trademarks to acquire direct angular measurements on three occasions separated by at least two weeks. The system's accuracy in assessing distances had a mean error of 1.203 mm and an uncertainty of 2.062, and for the angular values, a mean error of 0.778° and an uncertainty of 1.438. The intraclass correlation coefficient was for all intra-observer and inter-observers, almost perfect or perfect. The mean error for the distance's determination was statistically larger than 1 mm (1.203 mm) but with a trivial effect size. The mean error assessing angular values was statistically less than 1°. Our results are similar to those published by other authors in accuracy analyses of AR systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this study were to evaluate the outcomes of patients undergoing kinematic alignment (KA) robot-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with and without preoperative fixed flexion contracture (FFC) and address whether additional resection of the proximal tibia is required to address FFC. A retrospective review from 147 consecutive patients who received an RA-TKA with KA and a minimum one-year follow-up was performed. Preop and postop clinical and surgical data were collected. Groups were set based on preoperative extension deficits: group 1 (0–4°) (n = 64), group 2 (5–10°) (n = 64) and group 3 (>11°) (n = 27). There were no differences in patient demographics among the three groups. In group 3, the mean tibia resection was 0.85 mm thicker than group 1 (p < 0.05) and the preoperative extension deficit was improved from −17.22° (SD 3.49) preop to −2.41° (SD 4.47) postop (p < 0.05). Our results demonstrate that FFC can successfully be addressed in the RA-TKA with KA and rKA and that no additional femoral bone resection is needed to achieve full extension in patients with preoperative FFC when compared with patients without FFC. Only a slight increase in the amount of tibial resection was observed, but this was less than one millimetre. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Computer technologies play a crucial role in orthopaedic surgery and are essential in personalising different treatments. Recent advances allow the usage of augmented reality (AR) for many orthopaedic procedures, which include different types of knee surgery. AR assigns the interaction between virtual environments and the physical world, allowing both to intermingle (AR superimposes information on real objects in real-time) through an optical device and allows personalising different processes for each patient. This article aims to describe the integration of fiducial markers in planning knee surgeries and to perform a narrative description of the latest publications on AR applications in knee surgery. Augmented reality-assisted knee surgery is an emerging set of techniques that can increase accuracy, efficiency, and safety and decrease the radiation exposure (in some surgical procedures, such as osteotomies) of other conventional methods. Initial clinical experience with AR projection based on ArUco-type artificial marker sensors has shown promising results and received positive operator feedback. Once initial clinical safety and efficacy have been demonstrated, the continued experience should be studied to validate this technology and generate further innovation in this rapidly evolving field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A shallow sulcus characterizes trochlear dysplasia (TD) of the femoral trochlea, which can lead to chronic pain or instability of the patellofemoral joint. Breech presentation at birth has been identified as a risk factor for developing this condition, which an ultrasound can identify early. Early treatment could be considered at this stage, given the potential for remodelling in these skeletally immature patients. Newborns with breech presentation at birth who meet the inclusion criteria will be enrolled and randomised in equal proportions between treatment with the Pavlik harness and observation. The primary objective is to determine the difference in the means of the sulcus angle between the two treatment arms at two months. Ours is the first study protocol to evaluate an early non-invasive treatment for TD in the newborn with breech presentation at birth using a Pavlik harness. We hypothesised that trochlear dysplasia could be reverted when identified and treated early in life with a simple harness, as it is done with developmental dysplasia of the hip. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Axial vertebral rotation (AVR) and Cobb angles are the essential parameters to analyse different types of scoliosis, including adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The literature shows significant discrepancies in the validity and reliability of AVR measurements taken in radiographic examinations, according to the type of vertebra. This study's scope evaluated the validity and absolute reliability of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae AVR measurements, using a validated software based on Raimondi's method in digital X-rays that allowed measurement with minor error when compared with other traditional, manual methods. Twelve independent evaluators measured AVR on the 74 most rotated vertebrae in 42 X-rays with the software on three separate occasions, with one-month intervals. We have obtained a gold standard for the AVR of vertebrae. The validity and reliability of the measurements of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were studied separately. Measurements that were performed on lumbar vertebrae were shown to be 3.6 times more valid than those performed on thoracic, and with almost an equal reliability (1.38° ± 1.88° compared to −0.38° ± 1.83°). We can conclude that AVR measurements of the thoracic vertebrae show a more significant Mean Bias Error and a very similar reliability than those of the lumbar vertebrae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been remarkable advances in knee replacement surgery over the last few decades. One of the concerns continues to be the accuracy in achieving the desired alignment. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was developed to increase component placement accuracy, but the available evidence is not conclusive. Our study aimed to determine a PSI system's three-dimensional accuracy on 3D virtual models obtained by post-operative computed tomography. We compared the angular placement values of 35 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) operated within a year obtained with the planned ones, and we analyzed the possible relationships between alignment and patient-reported outcomes. The mean (SD) discrepancies measured by two experienced engineers to the planned values observed were 1.64° (1.3°) for the hip–knee–ankle angle, 1.45° (1.06°) for the supplementary angle of the femoral lateral distal angle, 1.44° (0.97°) for the proximal medial tibial angle, 2.28° (1.78°) for tibial slope, 0.64° (1.09°) for femoral sagittal flexion, and 1.42° (1.06°) for femoral rotation. Neither variables related to post-operative alignment nor the proportion of change between pre-and post-operative alignment influenced the patient-reported outcomes. The evaluated PSI system's three-dimensional alignment analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the angular values planned and those obtained. However, we did not find a relevant effect size, and this slight discrepancy did not impact the clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]