Search

Background : Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains challenging due to progression despite androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Current treatments, including androgen receptor-targeted agents, chemotherapy, bone-targeted agents, and PARP inhibitors, extend survival but face challenges, such as resistance, adverse effects, and limited durability. Metastasis-directed therapies (MDTs), such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), show promise in oligometastatic disease, but their role in oligoprogressive mCRPC is unclear. Salvage lymphadenectomy is rarely pursued due to invasiveness and limited data. This is the first report of robotic surgery as an MDT in this setting, demonstrating the potential of salvage robot-assisted video-endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) to manage oligoprogressive mCRPC and delay systemic progression. Methods : A 47-year-old male with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (Gleason 10) underwent ADT, docetaxel chemotherapy, and radical retropubic prostatectomy with super-extended pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Upon progression to oligoprogressive mCRPC, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT detected a single metastatic inguinal lymph node. Salvage RAVEIL was performed using the da Vinci X™ Surgical System, guided by preoperative ultrasound mapping. Results : Histopathology confirmed metastasis in one of the eight excised lymph nodes. The patient achieved undetectable PSA levels and prolonged biochemical progression-free survival. Minor complications (lymphorrhea, cellulitis) resolved without sequelae. No further progression was observed for over 14 months. Conclusions : This case highlights RAVEIL as a viable MDT option for oligoprogressive mCRPC, potentially extending progression-free intervals while minimizing systemic treatment.

Applying a proton beam in radiotherapy enables precise irradiation of the tumor volume, but only for continuous assessment of changes in patient anatomy. Proton beam range uncertainties in the treatment process may originate not only from physical beam properties but also from patient-specific factors such as tumor shrinkage, edema formation and sinus filling, which are not incorporated in tumor volume safety margins. In this paper, we evaluated variations in dose distribution in proton therapy resulting from the differences observed in the control tomographic images and the dosimetric influence of applied adaptive treatment. The data from weekly computed tomography (CT) control scans of 21 patients, which serve as the basis for adaptive radiotherapy, were used for this study. Dosimetric analysis of adaptive proton therapy (APT) was performed on patients with head and neck (H&N) area tumors who were divided into two groups: patients with tumors in the sinus/nasal area and patients with tumors in the brain area. For this analysis, the reference treatment plans were forward-calculated using weekly control CT scans. A comparative evaluation of organ at risk (OAR) dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, as well as conformity and homogeneity indices, was conducted between the initial and recalculated dose distributions to assess the necessity of the adaptation process in terms of dosimetric parameters. Changes in PTV volume after replanning were observed in seventeen patient cases, showing a discrepancy of over 1 cm3 in ten cases. In these cases, tumor progression occurred in 30% of patients, while regression was observed in 70%. The statistical analysis indicates that the use of the adaptive planning procedure results in a statistically significant improvement in dose distribution, particularly in the PTV area. The findings led to the conclusion that the adaptive procedure provides significant advantages in terms of dose distribution within the treated volume. However, when considering the entire patient group, APT did not result in a statistically significant dose reduction in OARs (α = 0.05).

Endometriosis is a chronic disease in which the endometrium cells are located outside the uterine cavity. The aim of this study was to evaluate circulating 20S proteasome and 20S immunoproteasome levels in plasma and peritoneal fluid in women with and without endometriosis in order to assess their usefulness as biomarkers of disease. Concentrations were measured using surface plasmon resonance imaging biosensors. Patients with suspected endometriosis were included in the study-plasma was collected in 112 cases and peritoneal fluid in 75. Based on the presence of endometriosis lesions detected during laparoscopy, patients were divided into a study group (confirmed endometriosis) and a control group (patients without endometriosis). Proteasome and immunoproteasome levels in both the plasma ( p = 0.174; p = 0.696, respectively) and the peritoneal fluid ( p = 0.909; p = 0.284, respectively) did not differ between those groups. There was a statistically significant difference in the plasma proteasome levels between patients in the control group and those with mild (Stage I and II) endometriosis ( p = 0.047) and in the plasma immunoproteasome levels in patients with ovarian cysts compared to those without ( p = 0.017). The results of our study do not support the relevance of proteasome and immunoproteasome determination as biomarkers of the disease but suggest a potentially active role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

An evaluation of the association between the concentrations of vitamin D-binding protein and lactoferrin in the plasma and peritoneal fluid may facilitate the elucidation of molecular mechanisms in endometriosis. Vitamin D-binding protein and lactoferrin concentrations were measured by ELISA in plasma and peritoneal fluid samples from 95 women with suspected endometriosis as classified by laparoscopy into groups with (n = 59) and without endometriosis (n = 36). There were no differences ( p > 0.05) in the plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations of vitamin D-binding protein and lactoferrin between women with and without endometriosis. In women with endometriosis, there was a significant correlation between plasma and peritoneal fluid vitamin D-binding protein concentrations (r = 0.821; p = 0.000), but there was no correlation between lactoferrin concentrations in those compartments (r = 0.049; p > 0.05). Furthermore, in endometriosis, lactoferrin was found to correlate poorly with vitamin D-binding protein (r= -0.236; p > 0.05) in plasma, while in the peritoneal fluid, the correlation between those proteins was significant (r = 0.399; p = 0.002). The characteristic properties of vitamin D-binding protein and lactoferrin and the associations between their plasma and peritoneal fluid concentrations found in women with endometriosis may provide a novel panel of markers to identify high-risk patients in need of further diagnostic measures.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between lactoferrin and iron and its binding proteins in women with endometriosis by simultaneously measuring these parameters in plasma and peritoneal fluid. Ninety women were evaluated, of whom 57 were confirmed as having endometriosis. Lactoferrin was measured by ELISA, transferrin, ferritin and iron on a Cobas 8000 analyser. Lactoferrin and transferrin in peritoneal fluid were lower compared to plasma, in contrast to ferritin and iron. In plasma, lactoferrin showeds associations with iron and transferrin in endometriosis and with ferritin in the group without endometriosis. Lactoferrin in peritoneal fluid correlated with lactoferrin, iron and transferrin of plasma in patients without endometriosis. The ratio of lactoferrin concentration in peritoneal fluid to plasma differentiated stage I versus IV of endometriosis and was negatively correlated with the iron ratio in patients without endometriosis. The ferritin ratio differentiated women with and without endometriosis. The very high ferritin ratios, especially in advanced stages of endometriosis, suggest the protective involvement of this protein in peritoneal fluid and the loss of this role by lactoferrin. The results demonstrate the validity of assessing iron metabolism in women with endometriosis, which may be useful as a marker of the disease and its progression.

Laparoscopy as a diagnostic tool for patients with suspected endometriosis is associated with several potentially life-threatening complications. Therefore, it is imperative to identify reliable, non-invasive biomarkers of the disease. The aim of this study was to analyse the concentrations of fibronectin and type IV collagen in peritoneal fluid and plasma to assess their role as potential biomarkers in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Fibronectin and collagen IV protein levels were assessed by surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) biosensors with the usage of monoclonal antibodies. All patients enrolled in the study were referred for laparoscopy for the diagnosis of infertility or chronic pelvic pain (n = 84). The study group included patients with endometriosis confirmed during surgery (n = 49). The concentration of fibronectin in the plasma (329.3 ± 98.5 mg/L) and peritoneal fluid (26.8 ± 11.1 μg/L) in women with endometriosis was significantly higher than in the control group (251.2 ± 84.0 mg/L, 7.0 ± 5.9 μg/L). Fibronectin levels were independent of endometriosis stage ( p = 0.874, p = 0.469). No significant differences were observed in collagen IV levels ( p = 0.385, p = 0.465). The presence of elevated levels of fibronectin may indicate abnormalities in cell-ECM signalling during the course of endometriosis, and may be a potential biomarker for early detection.

Cadherin 12 (CDH 12) can play a role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. The aim of this study was to compare the levels of cadherin 12 in the peritoneal fluid between women with and without endometriosis. This was a multicenter cross-sectional study. Eighty-two patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures were enrolled in the study. Cadherin 12 concentrations were determined using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. No differences in cadherin 12 concentrations between patients with and without endometriosis were observed ( p = 0.4). Subgroup analyses showed that CDH 12 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with infertility or primary infertility and endometriosis in comparison with patients without endometriosis and without infertility or primary infertility ( p = 0.02) and also higher in patients with stage I or II endometriosis and infertility or primary infertility than in patients without endometriosis and infertility or primary infertility ( p = 0.03, p = 0.048, respectively). In total, CDH 12 levels were significantly higher in patients diagnosed with infertility or primary infertility ( p = 0.0092, p = 0.009, respectively) than in fertile women. Cadherin 12 can possibly play a role in the pathogenesis of infertility, both in women with and without endometriosis.