1. Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
- Author
-
Cammarata, Emanuele, Toia, Francesca, Rossi, Matteo, Cipolla, Calogero, Vieni, Salvatore, Speciale, Antonino, and Cordova, Adriana
- Subjects
PERIOPERATIVE care ,GENETIC mutation ,PAIN measurement ,BRCA genes ,MAMMAPLASTY ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,ACQUISITION of data ,PATIENT satisfaction ,FISHER exact test ,BREAST implants ,TREATMENT effectiveness ,T-test (Statistics) ,PEARSON correlation (Statistics) ,MEDICAL records ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,MASTECTOMY ,DECISION making in clinical medicine ,BODY mass index ,DATA analysis software ,ODDS ratio ,BREAST tumors ,POSTOPERATIVE pain - Abstract
Women with BRCA gene mutations have a higher lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. Furthermore, cancer is usually diagnosed at a younger age compared to the wild-type counterpart. Strategies for risk management include intensive surveillance or risk-reducing mastectomy. The latter provides a significant reduction of the risk of developing breast cancer, simultaneously ensuring a natural breast appearance due to the preservation of the skin envelope and the nipple-areola complex. Implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common technique after risk-reducing surgery and can be achieved with either a submuscular or a prepectoral approach, in one or multiple stages. This study analyzes the outcomes of the different reconstructive techniques through a retrospective review on 46 breasts of a consecutive, single-center case series. Data analysis was carried out with EpiInfo version 7.2. Results of this study show no significant differences in postoperative complications between two-stage tissue expander/implant reconstruction and direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction, with DTI having superior aesthetic outcomes, especially in the prepectoral subgroup. In our experience, the DTI prepectoral approach has proven to be a safe and less time-consuming alternative to the submuscular two-stage technique, providing a pleasant reconstructed breast and overcoming the drawbacks of subpectoral implant placement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF