Search

With the rapid growth of social media and live-streaming technology, live-stream selling has become integral to the digital economy. Using differential game theory, this paper examines how fairness concerns impact the profits of internet celebrities and brand manufacturers under the "pure commission" model. We analyzed no fairness concern, gap fairness concern, and self-due fairness concern models, to investigate the optimal decisions and corresponding profits for an internet celebrity and a brand manufacturer. The results show that the internet celebrity earned the highest profits with low commission rates under the self-due fairness concern model, whereas higher commission rates yielded higher profits for the internet celebrity under the gap fairness concern model. Simultaneously, fairness concerns significantly affected the cooperation stability and long-term benefits, motivating the internet celebrity to maintain efficient collaborations with the brand manufacturer. Furthermore, the self-due fairness concern model was more practical than the gap fairness concern model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Federated learning facilitates collaborative computation among multiple participants while safeguarding user privacy. However, current federated learning algorithms operate under the assumption that all participants are trustworthy and their systems are secure. Nonetheless, real-world scenarios present several challenges: (1) Malicious clients disrupt federated learning through model poisoning and data poisoning attacks. Although some research has proposed secure aggregation methods to address this issue, many methods have inherent limitations. (2) Clients may refuse or passively participate in the training process due to considerations of self-interest, and may even interfere with the training process due to competitive relationships. To overcome these obstacles, we have devised a reliable federated framework aimed at ensuring secure computing throughout the entirety of federated task processes. Initially, we propose a method for detecting malicious models to safeguard the integrity of model aggregation. Furthermore, we have proposed a fair contribution assessment method and awarded the right to write blocks to the creator of the optimal model, ensuring the active participation of participants in both local training and model aggregation. Finally, we establish a computational framework grounded in blockchain and smart contracts to uphold the integrity and fairness of federated tasks. To assess the efficacy of our framework, we conduct simulations involving various types of client attacks and contribution assessment scenarios using multiple open-source datasets. Results from these experiments demonstrate that our framework effectively ensures the credibility of federated tasks while achieving impartial evaluation of client contributions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Energy Communities (ECs) are aggregations of users that cooperate to achieve economic benefits by sharing energy instead of operating individually in the so-called "disagreement" case. As there is no unique notion of fairness for the cost/profit allocation of ECs, this paper aims to identify an allocation method that allows for an appropriate weighting of both the interests of an EC as a whole and those of all its members. The novelty is in comparing different optimization approaches and cooperative allocation criteria, satisfying different notions of fairness, to assess which one may be best suited for an EC. Thus, a cooperative model is used to optimize the operation of an EC that includes two consumers and two solar PV prosumers. The model is solved by the "Social Welfare" approach to maximizing the total "incremental" economic benefit (i.e., cost saving and/or profit increase) and by the "Nash Bargaining" approach to simultaneously maximize the total and individual incremental economic benefits, with respect to the "disagreement" case. Since the "Social Welfare" approach could lead to an unbalanced benefit distribution, the Shapley value and Nucleolus criteria are applied to re-distribute the total incremental economic benefit, leading to higher annual cost savings for consumers with lower electricity demand. Compared to "Social Welfare" without re-distribution, the Nash Bargaining distributes 39–49% and 9–17% higher annual cost savings to consumers with lower demand and to prosumers promoting the energy sharing within the EC, respectively. However, total annual cost savings drop by a maximum of 5.5%, which is the "Price of Fairness". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Artificial intelligence (AI) is widely used in healthcare applications to perform various tasks. Although these models have great potential to improve the healthcare system, they have also raised significant ethical concerns, including biases that increase the risk of health disparities in medical applications. The under-representation of a specific group can lead to bias in the datasets that are being replicated in the AI models. These disadvantaged groups are disproportionately affected by bias because they may have less accurate algorithmic forecasts or underestimate the need for treatment. One solution to eliminate bias is to use synthetic samples or artificially generated data to balance datasets. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to review and evaluate how synthetic data can be generated and used to mitigate biases, specifically focusing on the medical domain. We explored high-quality peer-reviewed articles that were focused on synthetic data generation to eliminate bias. These studies were selected based on our defined inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria and the quality of the content. The findings reveal that generated synthetic data can help improve accuracy, precision, and fairness. However, the effectiveness of synthetic data is closely dependent on the quality of the data generation process and the initial datasets used. The study also highlights the need for continuous improvement in synthetic data generation techniques and the importance of evaluation metrics for fairness in AI models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite major breakthroughs in facial recognition technology, problems with bias and a lack of diversity still plague face recognition systems today. To address these issues, we created synthetic face data using a diffusion-based generative model and fine-tuned already-high-performing models. To achieve a more balanced overall performance across various races, the synthetic dataset was created by following the dual-condition face generator (DCFace) resolution and using race-varied data from BUPT-BalancedFace as well as FairFace. To verify the proposed method, we fine-tuned a pre-trained improved residual networks (IResnet)-100 model with additive angular margin (ArcFace) loss using the synthetic dataset. The results show that the racial gap in performance is reduced from 0.0107 to 0.0098 in standard deviation terms, while the overall accuracy increases from 96.125% to 96.1625%. The improved racial balance and diversity in the synthetic dataset led to an improvement in model fairness, demonstrating that this resource could facilitate more equitable face recognition systems. This method provides a low-cost way to address data diversity challenges and help make face recognition more accurate across different demographic groups. The results of the study highlighted that more advanced synthesized datasets, created through diffusion-based models, can also result in increased facial recognition accuracy with greater fairness, emphasizing that these should not be ignored by developers aiming to create artificial intelligence (AI) systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We introduce the random high-local performance client selection strategy, termed Fed-RHLP. This approach allows opportunities for higher-performance clients to contribute more significantly by updating and sharing their local models for global aggregation. Nevertheless, it also enables lower-performance clients to participate collaboratively based on their proportional representation determined by the probability of their local performance on the roulette wheel (RW). Improving symmetry in federated learning involves IID Data: symmetry is naturally present, making model updates easier to aggregate and Non-IID Data: asymmetries can impact performance and fairness. Solutions include data balancing, adaptive algorithms, and robust aggregation methods. Fed-RHLP enhances federated learning by allowing lower-performance clients to contribute based on their proportional representation, which is determined by their local performance. This fosters inclusivity and collaboration in both IID and Non-IID scenarios. In this work, through experiments, we demonstrate that Fed-RHLP offers accelerated convergence speed and improved accuracy in aggregating the final global model, effectively mitigating challenges posed by both IID and Non-IID Data distribution scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Machine learning algorithms significantly impact decision-making in high-stakes domains, necessitating a balance between fairness and accuracy. This study introduces an in-processing, multi-objective framework that leverages the Reject Option Classification (ROC) algorithm to simultaneously optimize fairness and accuracy while safeguarding protected attributes such as age and gender. Our approach seeks a multi-objective optimization solution that balances accuracy, group fairness loss, and individual fairness loss. The framework integrates fairness objectives without relying on a weighted summation method, instead focusing on directly optimizing the trade-offs. Empirical evaluations on publicly available datasets, including German Credit, Adult Income, and COMPAS, reveal several significant findings: the ROC-based approach demonstrates superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 94.29%, an individual fairness loss of 0.04, and a group fairness loss of 0.06 on the German Credit dataset. These results underscore the effectiveness of our framework, particularly the ROC component, in enhancing both the fairness and performance of machine learning models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examines the moderating role of procedural fairness between land titling programs and agricultural investment. We constructed a theoretical model that introduces perceived security of land tenure and procedural fairness into the traditional "property rights-investment incentives" analytical framework. Moreover, we empirically analyze the impact of land titling and its procedural fairness on agricultural investment using data from the "Thousands of People, Hundreds of Villages" survey held in 2018 among 9596 households in China. The empirical analyses were conducted by using the ordinary least squares (OLS), probit, and instrumental variable methods. Our analysis showed that land titling in China significantly promotes agricultural investment by farm households and that procedural fairness has a significant positive moderating role in the investment incentive effect of land titling as well as significantly improving the institutional credibility of land titling and enhancing farmers' perceived land tenure security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The accelerated development of AI technology has brought about revolutionary changes in various fields of society. Recently, it has been emphasized that fairness, accountability, transparency, and explainability (FATE) should be considered to support the reliability and validity of AI-based decision-making. However, in the case of autonomous driving technology, which is directly related to human life and requires real-time adaptation and response to various changes and risks in the real world, environmental adaptability must be considered in a more comprehensive and converged manner. In order to derive definitive evidence for each object in a convergent autonomous driving environment, it is necessary to transparently collect and provide various types of road environment information for driving objects and driving assistance and to construct driving technology that is adaptable to various situations by considering all uncertainties in the real-time changing driving environment. This allows for unbiased and fair results based on flexible contextual understanding, even in situations that do not conform to rules and patterns, by considering the convergent interactions and dynamic situations of various objects that are possible in a real-time road environment. The transparent, environmentally adaptive, and fairness-based outcomes provide the basis for the decision-making process and support clear interpretation and explainability of decisions. All of these processes enable autonomous vehicles to draw reliable conclusions and take responsibility for their decisions in autonomous driving situations. Therefore, this paper proposes an adaptability, fairness, transparency, explainability, and accountability (AFTEA) framework to build a stable and reliable autonomous driving environment in dynamic situations. This paper explains the definition, role, and necessity of AFTEA in artificial intelligence technology and highlights its value when applied and integrated into autonomous driving technology. The AFTEA framework with environmental adaptability will support the establishment of a sustainable autonomous driving environment in dynamic environments and aims to provide a direction for establishing a stable and reliable AI system that adapts to various real-world scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In response to the fairness issue arising from the unequal delay of vehicles in different phases at intersections and considering the actual situation of small and variable delays for vehicles in low-saturation intersection phases, this paper proposes the concept of "sacrificing efficiency for fairness". Firstly, the universality of unfair delay phenomena at intersection phases is explained, especially at low-saturation intersections where the fluctuation in phase delays is 1.87 times higher than at other intersections. Then, a fairness evaluation index is constructed using information entropy, and the feasibility of the proposed approach is demonstrated. Subsequently, a signal optimization model that balances efficiency and fairness is proposed. Finally, the proposed model is validated through case studies, showing that it not only simultaneously considers efficiency and fairness but also has minimal impact on efficiency. Moreover, the changes to timing schemes in the efficiency model are much smaller compared to the model that only considers fairness. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the model performs better under low-saturation intersection conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Modern combat sports, including boxing, categorize participants by body mass to ensure fairness and safety. The effective mass, or the ability to maximize body mass during a punch, significantly impacts striking force. This study aims to explore the relationship between effective mass and striking force in lead jab and rear cross punches of boxers. Material and methods: Thirteen male boxers with an average body mass of 90.6 kg and average height of 184 cm participated. The study employed an AMTI MC12-2K force plate (AMTI, Watertown, MA, USA) and Noraxon Ultium EMG sensors (Noraxon, Scottsdale, AZ, USA) to measure impact force and acceleration. Each boxer performed five maximum-force strikes with both lead jab and rear cross techniques. Results: The rear cross punch generated significantly higher ground reaction force (1709.28 ± 486.62 N) compared to the lead jab (1182.56 ± 250.81 N). However, effective mass values were similar for both punches: lead jab (18.95 ± 5.29 kg, 21.51% of body mass) and rear cross (18.50 ± 5.56 kg, 21.04% of body mass). Higher body mass and longer training tenure positively correlated with higher effective mass. An inverse relationship was found between fist acceleration and effective mass. Conclusions: Effective mass plays a crucial role in punch biomechanics, with similar utilization between lead jab and rear cross punches despite the latter's higher force. Training focused on optimizing body mass utilization and refining punch techniques can enhance punch effectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We focus on an integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) system—a single platform equipped with multiple antennas transmitting a waveform to detect targets and communicate with downlink users. Due to spectrum sharing between multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) radar and multiuser MIMO (MU-MIMO) communication, beamforming is becoming increasingly important as a technique that enables the creation of directional beams. In this paper, we propose a novel joint transmit beamforming design scheme that employs a beam pattern approximation strategy for radar sensing and utilizes rate-splitting for multiuser communication offering advanced interference management strategies. The optimization problems are formulated from both radar-centric and trade-off viewpoints. First, we propose a radar-centric beamforming scheme to achieve sensing efficiency through beam pattern approximation, while requiring the fairness signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) to be higher than a given threshold to guarantee a minimal level of communication quality, while the obtained performance for the communication system is limited in this scheme. To address this problem, we propose a beamforming design scheme from a trade-off viewpoint that flexibly optimizes both sensing and communication performances with a regularization parameter. Finally, we propose a partial rate-splitting-based beamforming design method aimed at maximizing the effective sensing power, with the constraint of a minimal sum rate for downlink users. Numerical results are provided to assess the effectiveness of all proposed schemes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The goal of this paper was to describe the context within which the PASS theory of intelligence was conceived and the reasons why this theory was used to guide the construction of the Cognitive Assessment System and the several versions of the Cognitive Assessment System, 2nd Edition. We also discuss validity issues such as equitable assessment of intelligence, using PASS scores to examine a pattern of strengths and weaknesses related to academic variability and diagnosis, and the utility of PASS scores for intervention. We provide summaries of the research that informs our suggestions that intelligence testing should be theory-based, not constrained by the seminal work of test developers in the early 1900s, and neurocognitive processes should be measured based on brain function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article investigates reasons to participate in non-deterministic elections, where the outcomes incorporate elements of chance beyond mere tie-breaking. The background context situates this inquiry within democratic theory, specifically non-deterministic voting systems, which promise to re-evaluate fairness and power distribution among voting blocs. This study aims to explore the normative implications of such electoral systems and their impact on our moral duty to vote. We analyze instrumental reasons for voting, including prudential and act-consequentialist arguments, alongside non-instrumental reasons, assessing their validity in the context of non-deterministic systems. The results indicate that non-deterministic elections could strengthen the case for voting based on prudential and act-consequentialist grounds due to their proportional nature and the increased influence of each vote. We conclude that, while non-deterministic elections strengthen our duty to vote overall, they do not strengthen it for all the arguments in the literature. This paper contributes to the discourse on electoral systems by critically evaluating the moral obligation to vote in non-deterministic elections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We report an experiment designed to study bargaining behavior between one buyer and multiple sellers with complementarity and how it is influenced by fairness concern and information transparency. We base our setup on a structured alternating-offer bargaining model in which a buyer procures complementary items from two heterogeneous sellers with endogenous choice of the order of bargaining. In addition, we implemented an information transparency manipulation regarding whether the sellers were informed about each other's offers/counteroffers with the buyer. Experimental behavior exhibited deviations from equilibrium predictions that did not differ significantly by information condition, suggesting that sellers were not significantly influenced by direct social comparison between each other. Further analysis suggests that each seller demanded splitting the value of the deal approximately half-half with the buyer as a normative fairness benchmark. The buyers, on the other hand, did not have a demand for fairness that was based on a fairness benchmark. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Water shortages are serious in northwest China due to the level of social and economic development, engineering, resource shortages, and other factors being restricted, so the conflict between supply and demand for water resources is prominent in different regions and different water use sectors. Therefore, Pingliang City was selected as the research object in this study. The membership function was introduced, and an interactive algorithm to correct model parameters based on the fairness constraint was derived. An uncertain multi-objective fuzzy programming model was also established. The results show that the optimal allocation of water will be 38,051.9~40,740 × 104 m3 and 39,938.4~41,317.5 × 104 m3 under a normal year (p = 50%) and a dry year (p = 75%) in 2025, respectively, and the corresponding water shortage rates will be 4.2% and 6.7%. In 2035, the optimal water allocation will be 45,644.1~49,245.9 × 104 m3 and 46,442.4~50,044.2 × 104 m3 and the water shortage rates will be 7.0% and 7.0%, respectively. The proportion of groundwater supply will decrease by 8.8% and 13.8% in 2025 and 2035 after the optimal allocation, the proportion of surface water supply will increase by 9.6% and 12.2%, and the proportion of reclaimed water will increase by −0.78% and 2.1%, respectively. The results can provide a technical reference for the development and utilization of water resources in other cities and similar areas in semi-arid regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Machine learning algorithms have become common in everyday decision making, and decision-assistance systems are ubiquitous in our everyday lives. Hence, research on the prevention and mitigation of potential bias and unfairness of the predictions made by these algorithms has been increasing in recent years. Most research on fairness and bias mitigation in machine learning often treats each protected variable separately, but in reality, it is possible for one person to belong to multiple protected categories. Hence, in this work, combining a set of protected variables and generating new columns that separate these protected variables into many subcategories was examined. These new subcategories tend to be extremely imbalanced, so bias mitigation was approached as an imbalanced classification problem. Specifically, four new custom sampling methods were developed and investigated to sample these new subcategories. These new sampling methods are referred to as protected-category oversampling, protected-category proportional sampling, protected-category Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (PC-SMOTE), and protected-category Adaptive Synthetic Sampling (PC-ADASYN). These sampling methods modify the existing sampling method by focusing their sampling on the new subcategories rather than the class label. The impact of these sampling strategies was then evaluated based on classical performance and fairness in classification settings. Classification performance was measured using accuracy and F1 based on training univariate decision trees, and fairness was measured using equalized odd differences and statistical parity. To evaluate the impact of fairness versus performance, these measures were evaluated against decision tree depth. The results show that the proposed methods were able to determine optimal points, whereby fairness was increased without decreasing performance, thus mitigating any potential performance–fairness tradeoff. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The concept of "all cores are created equal" has been popular for several decades due to its simplicity and effectiveness in CPU (Central Processing Unit) design. The more cores the CPU has, the higher performance the host owns and the higher the power consumption. However, power-saving is also one of the key goals for servers in data centers and embedded devices (e.g., mobile phones). The big.LITTLE multicore architecture, which contains high-performance cores (namely big core) and power-saved cores (namely little core), has been developed by ARM (Advanced RISC Machine) and Intel to trade off performance and power efficiency. Facing the new heterogeneous computing architecture, the traditional lock algorithms, which are designed to run on homogeneous computing architecture, cannot work optimally as usual and drop into the performance issue for the difference between big core and little core. In our preliminary experiment, we observed that, in the big.LITTLE multicore architecture, all these lock algorithms exhibit sub-optimal performance. The FIFO-based (First In First Out) locks experience throughput degradation, while the performance of competition-based locks can be divided into two categories. One of them is big-core-friendly, so their tail latency increases significantly; the other is little-core-friendly. Not only does the tail latency increase, but the throughput is also degraded. Motivated by this observation, we propose a Core-Aware Lock for the big.LITTLE multicore architecture named CAL, which keeps each core having an equal opportunity to access the critical section in the program. The core idea of the CAL is to take the slowdown ratio as the matric to reorder lock requests of these big and little cores. By evaluating benchmarks and a real-world application named LevelDB, CAL is confirmed to achieve fairness goals in heterogeneous computing architecture without sacrificing the performance of the big core. Compared to several traditional lock algorithms, the CAL's fairness has increased by up to 67%; and Its throughput is 26% higher than FIFO-based locks and 53% higher than competition-based locks, respectively. In addition, the tail latency of CAL is always kept at a low level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) serves as a cornerstone mechanism for implementing Congestion Control (CC) across the Internet. Designing a solution that provides high bandwidth utilization and mitigates the phenomenon of bufferbloat across a spectrum of diverse scenarios poses a considerable challenge. The introduction of Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round Trip propagation time (BBR) in 2016 marked a significant shift in congestion control methodology. Its improved performance and adaptability contributed to the initial acclaim and widespread interest that it received.. Unlike most currently used CCs, it operates around Kleinrock's optimal point, thus offering high throughput even in lossy networks while preventing buffer saturation. Unfortunately, it quickly became evident that BBR was unable to fairly share bandwidth with flows characterized by different path delays, as well as loss-based CCs. In response, Google recently introduced a third iteration to address these shortcomings. This study explores the performance of BBRv3 across a wide range of scenarios, thereby considering different buffer sizes and paths with varying Round Trip Times (RTTs), and it evaluates its superiority over its predecessors. Through extensive simulations, this work assesses whether BBRv3 can finally play fair with other bandwidth contenders, which is a critical consideration given the widespread deployment of BBR. The framework is publicly available to facilitate additional validation and ensure the reproducibility of the study's findings. The results indicate that while BBRv3 demonstrates enhanced fairness towards loss-based CC algorithms, it struggles when competing against other BBR flows, especially in multi-RTT networks, thus falling short even when compared to the initial version. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multi-link operation (MLO) is a new and essential mechanism of IEEE 802.11be Extremely High Throughput (Wi-Fi 7) that can increase throughput and decrease latency in Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs). The MLO enables a Multi-Link Device (MLD) to perform Simultaneous Transmission and Reception (STR) in different frequency bands. However, not all MLDs can support STR due to cross-link or in-device coexistence interference, while an STR-unable MLD (NSTR-MLD) can transmit multiple frames simultaneously in more than two links. This study focuses on the problems when NSTR-MLDs share a link with Single-Link Devices (SLDs). We propose a Contention-Less Synchronous Transmission (CLST) mechanism to improve fairness between NSTR-MLDs and SLDs while increasing the total network throughput. The proposed mechanism classifies links as MLD Dominant Links (MDLs) and Heterogeneous Coexistence Links (HCLs). In the proposed mechanism, an NSTR-MLD obtains a Synchronous Transmission Token (STT) through a virtual channel contention in the HCL but does not actually transmit a frame in the HCL, which is compensated for by a synchronous transmission triggered in the MDL. Moreover, the CLST mechanism allows additional subsequent transmissions up to the accumulated STT without further contention. Extensive simulation results confirm the outstanding performance of the CLST mechanism in terms of total throughput and fairness compared to existing synchronous transmission mechanisms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article proposes a distributed intelligent Coordinated Multi-Point Non-Orthogonal Multiple-Access (CoMP-NOMA) collaborative transmission model with the assistance of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) to address the issues of poor communication quality, low fairness, and high system power consumption for edge users in multi-cellular networks. By analyzing the interaction mechanisms and influencing factors among RIS signal enhancement, NOMA user scheduling, and multi-point collaborative transmission, the model establishes RIS-enhanced edge user grouping and coordinates NOMA user clusters based on this. In the multi-cell RIS-assisted JT-CoMP NOMA downlink transmission, joint optimization of the power allocation (PA), user clustering (UC), and RIS phase-shift matrix design (PS) poses a challenging Mixed-Integer Non-Linear Programming (MINLP) problem. The original problem is decomposed by optimizing the formulas into joint sub-problems of PA, UC, and PA and PS, and solved using an alternating optimization approach. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed scheme effectively reduces the system's power consumption while significantly improving the system's throughput and rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While a gambler may occasionally win, continuous gambling inevitably results in a net loss to the casino. This study experimentally demonstrates the profitability of a particularly deceptive casino game: a two-armed antique Mills Futurity slot machine. The main findings clearly show that both non-random and random two-arm strategies, predetermined by the player and repeated without interruption, are always profitable for the casino, despite two coins being refunded for every two consecutive losses by the gambler. We theoretically explore the cyclical nature of slot machine strategies and speculate on the impact of the frequency of switching strategies on casino returns. Our results not only assist casino owners in developing and improving casino designs, but also guide gamblers to participate more cautiously in gambling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a stigmatizing disease that disproportionately affects African Americans and Latinos among people living with HIV (PLWH). Researchers are increasingly utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze large amounts of data such as social media data and electronic health records (EHR) for various HIV-related tasks, from prevention and surveillance to treatment and counseling. This paper explores the ethical considerations surrounding the use of AI for HIV with a focus on acceptability, trust, fairness, and transparency. To improve acceptability and trust towards AI systems for HIV, informed consent and a Federated Learning (FL) approach are suggested. In regard to unfairness, stakeholders should be wary of AI systems for HIV further stigmatizing or even being used as grounds to criminalize PLWH. To prevent criminalization, in particular, the application of differential privacy on HIV data generated by data linkage should be studied. Participatory design is crucial in designing the AI systems for HIV to be more transparent and inclusive. To this end, the formation of a data ethics committee and the construction of relevant frameworks and principles may need to be concurrently implemented. Lastly, the question of whether the amount of transparency beyond a certain threshold may overwhelm patients, thereby unexpectedly triggering negative consequences, is posed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Farmers' attitude plays a crucial role in the success of land acquisition. To add new insights and theoretical support for the effective governance of land acquisition, this paper examines the effectiveness of administrative power on farmers' attitude and the mediating role of perceived fairness based on asymmetric dependency theory. The hypotheses were verified using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis conducted with data gathered from 250 questionnaire samples in rural areas of China. The results reveal that the coercion and transparency of administrative power have a significant positive impact on farmers' attitude while normality's influence is not significant. The coercion and transparency of administrative power have a significant positive impact on fairness while normality's impact is not significant. The mediating effect of perceived fairness was insignificant. Therefore, local governments could encourage farmers to embrace a cooperative attitude in land acquisition negotiations by fostering a constructive interaction between the government and the public and pursuing a high-level institutional balance driven by a service-oriented government. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Federated learning (FL) is a machine-learning framework that effectively addresses privacy concerns. It harnesses fragmented data from devices across the globe for model training and optimization while strictly adhering to user privacy protection and regulatory compliance. This framework holds immense potential for widespread applications in the smart-grid domain. Through FL, power companies can collaborate to train smart-grid models without revealing users' electricity consumption data, thus safeguarding their privacy. However, the data collected by clients often exhibits heterogeneity, which can lead to biases towards certain data features during the model-training process, therefore affecting the fairness and performance of the model. To tackle the fairness challenges that emerge during the federated-learning process in smart grids, this paper introduces FedCSGP, a novel federated-learning approach that incorporates client sampling and gradient projection. The main idea of FedCSGP is to categorize the causes of unfairness in federated learning into two parts: internal conflicts and external conflicts. Among them, the client-sampling strategy is used to resolve external conflicts, while the gradient-projection strategy is employed to address internal conflicts. By tackling both aspects, FederCSGP aims to enhance the fairness of the federated-learning model while ensuring the accuracy of the global model. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly improves the accuracy of poorly performing clients in smart-grid scenarios with lower communication costs, therefore enhancing the fairness of the federated-learning algorithm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In an era of dramatic technological progress, the consequent economic transformations, and an increasing need for an adaptable workforce, the importance of education has risen to the forefront of the social discourse. The concurrent increase in the awareness of issues pertaining to social justice and the debate over what this justice entails and how it ought to be effected, feed into the education policy more than ever before. From the nexus of the aforementioned considerations, concern about the so-called education gap has emerged, with worldwide efforts to close it. Methods: I analyze the premises behind such efforts and demonstrate that they are founded upon fundamentally flawed ideas. Results: I show that in a society in which education is delivered equitably, education gaps emerge naturally as a consequence of differentiation due to talents, the tendency for matched mate selection, and the heritability of intellectual traits. Conclusion: I issue a call for a redirection of efforts away from the ill-founded idea of closing the education gap to the understanding of the magnitude of its unfair contributions, as well as to those social aspects that can modulate it in accordance with what a society deems fair according to its values. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Collaborative crowdsensing is a team collaboration model that harnesses the intelligence of a large network of participants, primarily applied in areas such as intelligent computing, federated learning, and blockchain. Unlike traditional crowdsensing, user recruitment in collaborative crowdsensing not only considers the individual capabilities of users but also emphasizes their collaborative abilities. In this context, this paper takes a unique approach by modeling user interactions as a graph, transforming the recruitment challenge into a graph theory problem. The methodology employs an enhanced Prim algorithm to identify optimal team members by finding the maximum spanning tree within the user interaction graph. After the recruitment, the collaborative crowdsensing explored in this paper presents a challenge of unfair incentives due to users engaging in free-riding behavior. To address these challenges, the paper introduces the MR-SVIM mechanism. Initially, the process begins with a Gaussian mixture model predicting the quality of users' tasks, combined with historical reputation values to calculate their direct reputation. Subsequently, to assess users' significance within the team, aggregation functions and the improved PageRank algorithm are employed for local and global influence evaluation, respectively. Indirect reputation is determined based on users' importance and similarity with interacting peers. Considering the comprehensive reputation value derived from the combined assessment of direct and indirect reputations, and integrating the collaborative capabilities among users, we have formulated a feature function for contribution. This function is applied within an enhanced Shapley value method to assess the relative contributions of each user, achieving a more equitable distribution of earnings. Finally, experiments conducted on real datasets validate the fairness of this mechanism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To achieve the energy transition, energy and energy efficiency are becoming more and more important in society. New methods, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) models, are needed to coordinate supply and demand and address the challenges of the energy transition. AI and ML are already being applied to a growing number of energy infrastructure applications, ranging from energy generation to energy forecasting and human activity recognition services. Given the rapid development of AI and ML, the importance of Trustworthy AI is growing as it takes on increasingly responsible tasks. Particularly in the energy domain, Trustworthy AI plays a decisive role in designing and implementing efficient and reliable solutions. Trustworthy AI can be considered from two perspectives, the Model-Centric AI (MCAI) and the Data-Centric AI (DCAI) approach. We focus on the DCAI approach, which relies on large amounts of data of sufficient quality. These data are becoming more and more synthetically generated. To address this trend, we introduce the concept of Synthetic Data-Centric AI (SDCAI). In this survey, we examine Trustworthy AI within a Synthetic Data-Centric AI context, focusing specifically on the role of simulation and synthetic data in enhancing the level of Trustworthy AI in the energy domain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fairness Artificial Intelligence (AI) aims to identify and mitigate bias throughout the AI development process, spanning data collection, modeling, assessment, and deployment—a critical facet of establishing trustworthy AI systems. Tackling data bias through techniques like reweighting samples proves effective for promoting fairness. This paper undertakes a systematic exploration of reweighting samples for conventional Machine-Learning (ML) models, utilizing five models for binary classification on datasets such as Adult Income and COMPAS, incorporating various protected attributes. In particular, AI Fairness 360 (AIF360) from IBM, a versatile open-source library aimed at identifying and mitigating bias in machine-learning models throughout the entire AI application lifecycle, is employed as the foundation for conducting this systematic exploration. The evaluation of prediction outcomes employs five fairness metrics from AIF360, elucidating the nuanced and model-specific efficacy of reweighting samples in fostering fairness within traditional ML frameworks. Experimental results illustrate that reweighting samples effectively reduces bias in traditional ML methods for classification tasks. For instance, after reweighting samples, the balanced accuracy of Decision Tree (DT) improves to 100%, and its bias, as measured by fairness metrics such as Average Odds Difference (AOD), Equal Opportunity Difference (EOD), and Theil Index (TI), is mitigated to 0. However, reweighting samples does not effectively enhance the fairness performance of K Nearest Neighbor (KNN). This sheds light on the intricate dynamics of bias, underscoring the complexity involved in achieving fairness across different models and scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Workforce indigenization in Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries is under-researched in international business literature, especially among expatriate academics from the Middle East and North Africa regions working in GCC countries. Therefore, drawing from the social exchange and conservation of resources theories, this study examines the moderating effect of perceived fairness on the relationship between positive affectivity (PA) and creativity in the context of enhanced indigenization of human resource (HR) policies in GCC countries. This study collects data from 228 mobile academics working in Saudi universities. Principal least squares structural equation modeling results show that PA positively impacts creativity. Further, perceived fairness is found to reinforce the connection between PA and creativity. This study's results indicate that host universities must build appealing HR policies to cope with the diverse challenges related to the indigenization of HR policies. Furthermore, this study highlights the role of positive personality traits in enhancing creativity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A growing number of organizations have used artificial intelligence (AI) to make decisions to replace human resource (HR) workers; yet, the fairness perceptions of the people affected by the decision are still unclear. Given that an organization's sustainability is significantly influenced by individuals' perceptions of fairness, this study takes a resume-screening scenario as an example to explore the impact of AI replacing humans on applicants' perceptions of fairness. This study adopts the method of the online scenario experiment and uses SPSS to analyze the experimental data: 189 and 214 people, respectively, participated in two online scenarios, with two independent variables of decision makers (AI and humans), two dependent variables of procedural and distributive fairness, and two moderating variables of outcome favorability and the expertise of AI. The results show that the applicants tend to view AI screening resumes as less fair than humans. Furthermore, moderating effects exist between the outcome favorability and the expertise of AI. This study reveals the impact of AI substituting for humans in decision-making on fairness. The proposed model can help organizations use AI to screen resumes more effectively. And future research can explore the collaboration between humans and AI to make human resource management decisions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extensive uncertainty can affect the efficiency and fairness of consensus in the consensus reaching process (CRP), but few scholars have studied consensus modeling that focuses on fairness and efficiency in uncertain environments. Additionally, the weight of the decision maker (DM) in the CRP is influenced by multiple factors. Therefore, this paper proposes robust consensus models (EFCMs) focusing on fairness and efficiency under uncertain costs to address these issues. Firstly, this paper constructs multiple uncertainty sets to describe the uncertainty of the unit adjustment cost. Secondly, the fair utility level and opinion adjustment distance are used to measure the fairness and efficiency of reaching consensus, respectively. Furthermore, this paper uses a data-driven method based on the KDE method combined with trust propagation in social networks to determine the DMs' weights jointly. Finally, this paper also applies the proposed models to the carbon emission reduction negotiation process between the government and enterprises. The experimental results and sensitivity analysis show that the consensus cost budget and the DMs' jealous preference behavior particularly affects the efficiency of reaching consensus, which provides a theoretical basis for solving practical decision making problems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems, like ChatGPT, have the potential to perpetuate and amplify cultural biases embedded in their training data, which are predominantly produced by dominant cultural groups. This paper explores the philosophical and technical challenges of detecting and mitigating cultural bias in generative AI, drawing on Plato's Allegory of the Cave to frame the issue as a problem of limited and distorted representation. We propose a multifaceted approach combining technical interventions, such as data diversification and culturally aware model constraints, with a deeper engagement with the cultural and philosophical dimensions of the problem. Drawing on theories of extended cognition and situated knowledge, we argue that mitigating AI biases requires a reflexive interrogation of the cultural contexts of AI development and a commitment to empowering marginalized voices and perspectives. We claim that controlling cultural bias in generative AI is inseparable from the larger project of promoting equity, diversity, and inclusion in AI development and governance. By bridging philosophical reflection with technical innovation, this paper contributes to the growing discourse on responsible and inclusive AI, offering a roadmap for detecting and mitigating cultural biases while grappling with the profound cultural implications of these powerful technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breast cancer is the most common cancer affecting women globally. Despite the significant impact of deep learning models on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, achieving fairness or equitable outcomes across diverse populations remains a challenge when some demographic groups are underrepresented in the training data. We quantified the bias of models trained to predict breast cancer stage from a dataset consisting of 1000 biopsies from 842 patients provided by AIM-Ahead (Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Consortium to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity). Notably, the majority of data (over 70%) were from White patients. We found that prior to post-processing adjustments, all deep learning models we trained consistently performed better for White patients than for non-White patients. After model calibration, we observed mixed results, with only some models demonstrating improved performance. This work provides a case study of bias in breast cancer medical imaging models and highlights the challenges in using post-processing to attempt to achieve fairness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this article is to suggest a better—theoretically and empirically grounded—understanding of the complex character of social justice in higher education. Theoretically, this article conceptualises social justice in higher education as mediating participation in, completion of and outcomes from higher education. It introduces the concept of composite capability for achieving higher education that captures capabilities to participate in, complete and gain outcomes from higher education. This study also develops a methodology for building an empirically based classification of countries regarding social justice in participation in higher education, taking into account the assessed inequality in students' pathways to higher education as well as inequality in their social conditions, associated with students' social origin. In so doing, it develops three indices: the index of inequalities in students' pathways, the index of inequalities in students' social conditions and the index of participation in higher education. Using microdata from the EUROSTUDENT VII survey (2019–2021) for 12 European countries, it applies the developed methodology to classify countries, for which data are available, by the degree of fairness in participation in higher education. This study's results demonstrate the social embeddedness of social justice in higher education in different economic and political contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Blockchain technology is a decentralized and secure paradigm for data processing, sharing, and storing. It relies on consensus protocol for all decisions, which focuses on computational and resource capability. For example, proof of work (PoW) and proof of stake (PoS) are the most famous consensus protocols that are currently used. However, these current consensus protocols are required to recruit a node with a high computational or a large amount of cryptocurrency to act as a miner node and to generate a new block. Unfortunately, these PoW and PoS protocols could be impractical for adoption in today's technological fields, such as the Internet of Things and healthcare. In addition, these protocols are susceptible to flexibility, security, and fairness issues, as they are discussed in detail in this work. Therefore, this paper introduces a proof of fairness (PoF) as a dynamic and secure consensus protocol for enhancing the mining selection process. The selection of the miner node is influenced by numerous factors, including the time required to generate a block based on the transaction's sensitivity. Firstly, a reverse auction mechanism is designed as an incentive mechanism to encourage all nodes to participate in the miner selection process. In a reverse auction, each node will draw its strategy based on its computational capability and claimed cost. Secondly, an expressive language is developed to categorize transaction types based on their sensitivity to processing time, ensuring compatibility with our miner selection process. Thirdly, a homomorphic concept is designed as a security and privacy scheme to protect the bidder's data confidentiality. Finally, an extensive evaluation involving numerical analysis was carried out to assess the efficiency of the suggested PoF protocol, which confirms that the proposed PoF is dynamic and more efficient than current PoW and PoS consensus protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The significant advancements in applying artificial intelligence (AI) to healthcare decision-making, medical diagnosis, and other domains have simultaneously raised concerns about the fairness and bias of AI systems. This is particularly critical in areas like healthcare, employment, criminal justice, credit scoring, and increasingly, in generative AI models (GenAI) that produce synthetic media. Such systems can lead to unfair outcomes and perpetuate existing inequalities, including generative biases that affect the representation of individuals in synthetic data. This survey study offers a succinct, comprehensive overview of fairness and bias in AI, addressing their sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies. We review sources of bias, such as data, algorithm, and human decision biases—highlighting the emergent issue of generative AI bias, where models may reproduce and amplify societal stereotypes. We assess the societal impact of biased AI systems, focusing on perpetuating inequalities and reinforcing harmful stereotypes, especially as generative AI becomes more prevalent in creating content that influences public perception. We explore various proposed mitigation strategies, discuss the ethical considerations of their implementation, and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to ensure effectiveness. Through a systematic literature review spanning multiple academic disciplines, we present definitions of AI bias and its different types, including a detailed look at generative AI bias. We discuss the negative impacts of AI bias on individuals and society and provide an overview of current approaches to mitigate AI bias, including data pre-processing, model selection, and post-processing. We emphasize the unique challenges presented by generative AI models and the importance of strategies specifically tailored to address these. Addressing bias in AI requires a holistic approach involving diverse and representative datasets, enhanced transparency and accountability in AI systems, and the exploration of alternative AI paradigms that prioritize fairness and ethical considerations. This survey contributes to the ongoing discussion on developing fair and unbiased AI systems by providing an overview of the sources, impacts, and mitigation strategies related to AI bias, with a particular focus on the emerging field of generative AI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of the big data era has brought unprecedented data demands. The integration of computing resources with network resources in the computing force network enables the possibility of distributed collaborative training. However, unencrypted collaborative training is vulnerable to threats such as gradient inversion attacks and model theft. To address this issue, the data in collaborative training are usually protected by cryptographic methods. However, the semantic meaninglessness of encrypted data makes it difficult to prevent potential data poisoning attacks and free-riding attacks. In this paper, we propose a fairness guarantee approach for privacy-preserving collaborative training, employing blockchain technology to enable participants to share data and exclude potential violators from normal users. We utilize a cryptography-based secure aggregation method to prevent data leakage during blockchain transactions, and employ a contribution evaluation method for encrypted data to prevent data poisoning and free-riding attacks. Additionally, utilizing Shamir's secret sharing for secret key negotiation within the group, the negotiated key is directly introduced as noise into the model, ensuring the encryption process is computationally lightweight. Decryption is efficiently achieved through the aggregation of encrypted models within the group, without incurring additional computational costs, thereby enhancing the computational efficiency of the encryption and decryption processes. Finally, the experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Consumers are attracted by the increasing number of available SVOD platforms, but it would be too expensive to pay the subscription fees for all of them. To reduce costs, consumers can combine the use of proprietary subscriptions, non-proprietary subscriptions, and illegal streaming sites. In turn, platforms could enforce access control, a decision that might produce the desired reduction in non-proprietary subscriptions but also an undesired reduction in proprietary subscriptions. The effects of this decision and the determinants of SVOD content demand remain largely unexplored. We propose a baseline model where the SVOD content demand is driven by variety seeking, household financial situation, ethical evaluation, and social norms, as well as a change model where the subscription variation is driven by users' trait reactance and perceived fairness of the decision. We conducted a survey on the current ways SVOD content is consumed and responses to a hypothetical access control enforcement, with four randomized versions of the authentication mode. Results confirmed many of the proposed determinants and showed a noteworthy reduction in proprietary subscriptions due to the control enforcement but no effect due to the authentication modes. All these findings may help improve future models of SVOD content consumption and better address the difficult challenge of converting unauthorized users into authorized ones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Complex tax systems can result in tax evasion, which further impacts the revenues necessary to achieve sustainable development goals. Enhancing taxpayer education, tax knowledge, and tax fairness perception is essential for boosting revenues to support societal sustainability. The aim of this study was to assess the levels of tax knowledge and tax fairness perception within the Slovene taxpayer population, with a specific focus on the differences related to gender and settlement size. Further, the connections between tax knowledge and various aspects of tax fairness were explored. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to assess the statistical significance of gender and settlement size differences and the Kendall's coefficient of rank to determine the association between the tax knowledge and fairness perception dimensions. The results provide evidence that highlights disparities in tax knowledge between male and female taxpayers (p-value = 0.0116). Additionally, this study demonstrates that settlement size does not significantly impact tax knowledge perception among Slovene taxpayers (p-value = 0.2067). However, tax fairness encompasses various dimensions, and our research reveals no disparities based on gender (p-value = 0.7263) or settlement size (p-value = 0.2786). When assessing the correlation between tax knowledge and tax fairness perception, the results indicate statistically significant but weak correlations in both directions, depending on the specific fairness dimension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Optical interconnects are being discussed as a replacement for conventional electrical interconnects and are expected to be applied for future generations of high-performance supercomputers and data centers. Benes networks have attracted much attention because they require only 2 × 2 optical switches, which reduce the cost of rearrangeable nonblocking. However, optical power imbalances can significantly challenge receiver sensitivity. In this work, insertion loss (IL) fairness has been proposed and applied to the field of switches to achieve a relative balance of optical path data transmission in Benes networks. Fairness can be achieved when the port count is small (4 × 4) if the IL between ports is balanced. When the number of ports is moderate (8 × 8), we must use a suitable algorithm or determine the appropriate operating wavelength to minimize the power imbalance. An efficient two-step algorithm (ETS) has particular advantages in solving the path fairness problem and mitigating the power imbalance. As the number of ports increases, the switch states and topology jointly deteriorate the power imbalance. Finally, the ETS algorithm narrows the dynamic range requirement to 13.66 dB, with a 2 dB improvement. It achieves an extinction ratio of 24 dB and a bandwidth of 375 GHz, which outperforms the conventional 32 × 32 Benes network, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Face recognition in general scenarios has been saturated in recent years, but there is still room to enhance model performance in extreme scenarios and fairness situations. Inspired by the successful application of Transformer and ConvNet in computer vision, we propose a FIN-Block, which gives a more flexible composition paradigm for building a novel pure convolution model and provides a foundation for constructing a new framework for general face recognition in both extreme scenarios and fairness situations. FIN-Block-A uses a combination of stacked large-size convolution kernels and parallel convolution branches to ensure a large spatial receptive field while improving the module's deep feature embedding and extraction capabilities. FIN-Block-B takes advantage of stacked orthogonal convolution kernels and parallel branches to balance model size and performance. By applying FIN-Block with an adapted convolution kernel size in different stages, we built a reasonable and novel framework Face-Inception-Net, and the performance of the model is highly competitive with ConvNeXt and InceptionNeXt. The models were trained on CASIA-WebFace and MS-wo-RFW databases and evaluated on 14 mainstream benchmarks, including LFW, extreme scene, and fairness test sets. The proposed Face-Inception-Net achieved the highest average TAR@FAR0.001 of 95.9% in all used benchmarks, fully demonstrating effectiveness and generality in various scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper explores the landscape of research data in the humanities in the European context, delving into their diversity and the challenges of defining and sharing them. It investigates three aspects: the types of data in the humanities, their representation in repositories, and their alignment with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable). By reviewing datasets in repositories, this research determines the dominant data types, their openness, licensing, and compliance with the FAIR principles. This research provides important insight into the heterogeneous nature of humanities data, their representation in the repository, and their alignment with FAIR principles, highlighting the need for improved accessibility and reusability to improve the overall quality and utility of humanities research data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In recent years, deep learning models have led to improved accuracy in industrial defect detection, often using variants of YOLO (You Only Look Once), due to its high performance at a low cost. However, the generalizability, fairness and bias of their outcomes have not been examined, which may lead to overconfident predictions. Additionally, the complexity added by co-occurring defects, single and multi-class defects, and the effect on training, is not taken into consideration. This study addresses these critical gaps by introducing new methodologies for analyzing dataset complexity and evaluating model fairness. It introduces the novel approach of co-occurrence impact analysis, examining how the co-occurrence of defects in sample images affects performance, and introducing new dimensions to dataset preparation and training. Its aim is to increase model robustness in the face of real-world scenarios where multiple defects often appear together. Our study also innovates in the evaluation of model fairness by adapting the disparate impact ratio (DIR) to consider the true positive rate (TPR) across different groups and modifying the predictive parity difference (PPD) metric to focus on biases present in industrial quality control. Experiments demonstrate by cross-validation that the model trained on combined datasets significantly outperforms others in accuracy without overfitting and results in increased fairness, as validated by our novel fairness metrics. Explainability also provides valuable insights on the effects of different training regimes, notably absent in prior works. This work not only advances the field of deep learning for defect detection but also provides a strategic framework for future advancements, emphasizing the need for balanced datasets and considerations of ethics, fairness, bias and generalizability in the deployment of artificial intelligence in industry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The core issue in ridesharing is designing reasonable algorithms to match drivers and passengers. The ridesharing matching problem, influenced by various constraints such as weather, traffic, and supply–demand dynamics in real-world scenarios, requires optimization of multiple objectives like total platform revenue and passenger waiting time. Due to its complexity in terms of constraints and optimization goals, the ridesharing matching problem becomes a central issue in the field of mobile transportation. However, the existing research lacks exploration into the fairness of driver income, and some algorithms are not practically applicable in the industrial context. To address these shortcomings, we have developed a fairness-oriented dynamic matching algorithm for ridesharing, effectively optimizing overall platform efficiency (expected total driver income) and income fairness among drivers (entropy of weighted amortization fairness information between drivers). Firstly, we introduced a temporal dependency of matching outcomes on subsequent matches in the scenario setup and used reinforcement learning to predict these temporal dependencies, overcoming the limitation of traditional matching algorithms that rely solely on historical data and current circumstances for order allocation. Then, we implemented a series of optimization solutions, including the introduction of a time window matching model, pruning operations, and metric representation adjustments, to enhance the algorithm's adaptability and scalability for large datasets. These solutions also ensure the algorithm's efficiency. Finally, experiments conducted on real datasets demonstrate that our fairness-oriented algorithm based on reinforcement learning achieves improvements of 81.4%, 28.5%, and 79.7% over traditional algorithms in terms of fairness, platform utility, and matching efficiency, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The problem of multiple DAGs sharing satellite constellation resources has gradually attracted widespread attention. Due to the limited computing resources and energy consumption of satellite networks, it is necessary to formulate a reasonable multi-DAG task scheduling scheme to ensure the fairness of each workflow under the premise of considering latency and energy consumption. Therefore, in this paper, we propose a multi-DAG satellite network task scheduling algorithm based on cache-composite priority under the Software-Defined Networking satellite network architecture. The basic idea of this algorithm lies in the DAG selection phase, where not only are task priorities computed but also the concept of fair scheduling is introduced, so as to prevent the excessively delayed scheduling of low-priority DAG tasks. In addition, the concept of public subtasks is introduced to reduce the system overhead caused by repetitive tasks. The experimental results show that the hybrid scheduling strategy proposed in this paper can meet the demand of DAG scheduling and improve the degree of task completion while effectively reducing the task latency and energy consumption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eliminating poverty and achieving social justice are global concerns. China has focused on common prosperity. Comprehensive land consolidation is a potential policy tool that can contribute to common prosperity, but its effectiveness and implementation methods are yet to be verified and discussed. Therefore, we construct an analytical framework to understand how comprehensive land consolidation promotes common prosperity. The pilot area for comprehensive land consolidation in Ningbo City is used as a qualitative case study. The research results indicate that comprehensive land consolidation focuses on development and sharing to promote high-quality socio-economic development, social fairness, and justice. The paths for achieving development included the following: (1) a network governance structure consisting of multiple entities to enhance land governance; (2) various consolidation activities were conducted at the town scale to optimize the functionality and spatial pattern of public spaces; and (3) enabling the flow of urban and rural factors for improved resource allocation efficiency and providing an impetus for industrial development. The paths for achieving sharing included clarifying collective land ownership and promoting land transactions to provide diverse land values and ensure a shared distribution. This research provides new insights applicable to other Chinese cities and numerous developing countries engaged in land consolidation to address social distribution issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We identified a fairness problem in a network-based key-value storage system using Intel Storage Performance Development Kit (SPDK) in a multitenant environment. In such an environment, each tenant's I/O service rate is not fairly guaranteed compared to that of other tenants. To address the fairness problem, we propose OctoFAS, a two-level fair scheduler designed to improve overall throughput and fairness among tenants. The two-level scheduler of OctoFAS consists of (i) inter-core scheduling and (ii) intra-core scheduling. Through inter-core scheduling, OctoFAS addresses the load imbalance problem that is inherent in SPDK on the storage server by dynamically migrating I/O requests from overloaded cores to underloaded cores, thereby increasing overall throughput. Intra-core scheduling prioritizes handling requests from starving tenants over well-fed tenants within core-specific event queues to ensure fair I/O services among multiple tenants. OctoFAS is deployed on a Linux cluster with SPDK. Through extensive evaluations, we found that OctoFAS ensures that the total system throughput remains high and balanced, while enhancing fairness by approximately 10% compared to the baseline, when both scheduling levels operate in a hybrid fashion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The education sector has been quick to recognize the power of predictive analytics to enhance student success rates. However, there are challenges to widespread adoption, including the lack of accessibility and the potential perpetuation of inequalities. These challenges present in different stages of modeling, including data preparation, model development, and evaluation. These steps can introduce additional bias to the system if not appropriately performed. Substantial incompleteness in responses is a common problem in nationally representative education data at a large scale. This can lead to missing data and can potentially impact the representativeness and accuracy of the results. While many education-related studies address the challenges of missing data, little is known about the impact of handling missing values on the fairness of predictive outcomes in practice. In this paper, we aim to assess the disparities in predictive modeling outcomes for college student success and investigate the impact of imputation techniques on model performance and fairness using various notions. We conduct a prospective evaluation to provide a less biased estimation of future performance and fairness than an evaluation of historical data. Our comprehensive analysis of a real large-scale education dataset reveals key insights on modeling disparities and the impact of imputation techniques on the fairness of the predictive outcome under different testing scenarios. Our results indicate that imputation introduces bias if the testing set follows the historical distribution. However, if the injustice in society is addressed and, consequently, the upcoming batch of observations is equalized, the model would be less biased. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Smart grid operators seeking to extend their wireless network capacity can use unlicensed bands. However, devices in these shared bands must follow rules such as Listen Before Talk (LBT), standardized by ETSI. In this paper, we focus on the performance of the frame-based equipment (FBE) version of LBT channel access. We design, implement, and validate a fully functional FBE channel access simulator. Next, we conduct an extensive performance analysis of the FBE variants encountered in the literature, focusing on channel efficiency and fairness in upper-bound and coexistence scenarios. Our study leads to several conclusions about the operation of FBE-based devices, including the need for proper configuration of channel access parameters to ensure fairness and optimal performance. We also observe generally poor coexistence among FBE variants: the highest Jain's fairness index was only 0.88, with an average normalized channel efficiency of 0.76. Therefore, we identify several open research areas in the field, such as the need for further development of parameter adaptation algorithms, the deployment of an external controller to update channel access parameters, and new FBE designs with better coexistence qualities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]