Search

Background and aims: Despite technical advances, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is associated with complications and potentially lethal outcomes. Sarcopenia, a complex syndrome mainly associated with aging, has been recognized as a predictor of poor surgical outcomes. Thus far, the impact of sarcopenia on ERCP remains unknown. The present study evaluates the role of sarcopenia as a predictor of ERCP-related outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients. Methods: Patients who underwent ERCP between June 2019 and January 2023 were retrospectively included. Demographic and procedure-associated data were collected. Sarcopenia was assessed using the skeletal muscle index (SMI) measured from a single axial slice through the L3 vertebra on a CT scan. ERCP-related outcomes were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the correlation between sarcopenia and procedural outcomes. Results: In total, 256 patients were enrolled, of whom 30 (11.7%) were sarcopenic. Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP occurred in 3.5%. Sarcopenia was associated with higher 30-day and 12-month post-ERCP mortality (OR 3.45, p = 0.03; OR 3.87, p = 0.004) and longer hospitalization time (7 vs. 11 days, p = 0.003). Conclusions: SMI is an easy and objective index of sarcopenia that could be used to predict ERCP outcomes. Indeed, sarcopenia was independently associated with prolonged hospitalization and increased mortality in a retrospective cohort of elderly patients.

Duodenoscope-related infections are a major concern in medicine and GI endoscopy, especially in fragile patients. Disposable duodenoscopes seem to be the right tool to minimize the problem: a good choice for patients with many comorbidities or with a high risk of carrying multidrug resistant bacteria. Urgent endoscopy could also be a good setting for the use of single-use duodenoscopes, especially when the risk of the infection cannot be evaluated. Their safety and efficacy in performing ERCP has been proven in many studies. However, randomized clinical trials and comparative large studies with reusable scopes are lacking. Moreover, the present early stage of their introduction on the market does not allow a large economical evaluation for each health system. Thus, accurate economical and safety comparisons with cap-disposable duodenoscopes are needed. Moreover, the environmental impact of single-use duodenoscopes should be carefully evaluated, considering the ongoing climate change. In conclusion, definitive guidelines are needed to choose wisely the appropriate patients for ERCP with disposable duodenoscopes as the complete switch to single-use duodenoscopes seems to be difficult, to date. Many issues are still open, and they need to be carefully evaluated in further, larger studies.