Search

The surgical management of adult spinal deformities (ASDs) involves a wide variety of complex and technically challenging operative techniques. Despite numerous publications examining the relationship between surgeon experience and outcomes in ASD, no systematic review or meta-analysis exists. This first-time systematic review and meta-analysis examines the impact of surgeon experience on the surgical parameters and complication rates for the surgical management of ASD. Four databases were used for the initial search of this study from database inception until 22 September 2023. The inclusion criteria required articles that examined the outcomes for surgery for ASD, stratified outcomes by surgeon experience and/or the learning curve as a proxy for surgeon experience, and utilized adult patients (>18 years of age). Seven articles met the criteria for final inclusion. Patients in the Experienced Surgeon group had statistically significantly lower levels of EBL with no significant difference in operative time after surgery for ASD compared to patients in the Inexperienced Surgeon group via a meta-analysis of three articles. Patients in the Experienced Surgeon group had a statistically significantly lower total complication rate compared to patients in the Inexperienced Surgeon group via a meta-analysis. Increased surgeon experience resulted in lower levels of EBL, without a significant difference in the operative time after surgery for ASD.

The use of midfoot wedges for the correction of flatfeet disorders, such as progressive collapsing foot disorder, has increased greatly in recent years. However, the wedge material/composition has yet to be standardized. Metallic wedges offer advantages such as comparable elasticity to bone, reduced infection risk, and minimized osseous resorption, but a comprehensive review is lacking in the literature. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to organize all studies pertaining to the use of metallic wedges for flatfoot correction to better understand their efficacy and safety. This systematic review adhered to PRISMA guidelines, and articles were searched in multiple databases (PubMED, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science) until August 2023 using a defined algorithm. Inclusion criteria encompassed midfoot surgeries using metallic wedges, observational studies, and English-language full-text articles. Data extraction, article quality assessment, and statistical analyses were performed. Among 11 included articles, a total of 444 patients were assessed. The average follow-up duration was 18 months. Radiographic outcomes demonstrated that patients who received metallic wedges experienced improvements in lateral calcaneal pitch angle and Meary’s angle, with an enhancement of up to 15.9 degrees reported in the latter. Success rates indicated superior outcomes for metallic wedges (99.3%) compared to bone allograft wedges (89.9%), while complications were generally minor, including hardware pain and misplacement. Notably, there were no infection complications due to the inert nature of the metallic elements. This review summarizes the effectiveness, success rates, and safety of metallic wedges for flatfoot correction. Radiographic improvements and high success rates highlight their efficacy. Minor complications, including pain and mispositioning, were reported, but the infection risk remained low. Our results demonstrate that metallic midfoot wedges may be a viable option over allograft wedges with proper planning. Future research should prioritize long-term studies and standardized measures.

Cervical disc degenerative disease (CDDD) is a common spinal pathology that is often treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and/or hybrid cervical surgery (HCS). The purpose of this first-time systematic review is to examine the biomechanical outcomes associated with three types of non-contiguous cervical surgeries—ACDF, CDA, and HCS—to provide a greater understanding of non-contiguous cervical surgical biomechanics. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, and Web of Science from database inception until June 6th, 2023. The inclusion criteria was any article that reported biomechanical or kinematic outcomes, outcomes for any of the three non-contiguous cervical surgeries, and human-derived and/or human cadaver subjects. A total of 5 biomechanical articles were included from a total of 523 articles. Non-contiguous two-level HCS experienced less drastic range-of-motion (ROM) changes throughout the cervical spine and decreased intervertebral disc pressure (IDP) compared to non-contiguous two-level ACDF. Non-contiguous two-level CDA resulted in more cervical ROM and less non-operative segment facet contact force compared to non-contiguous two level ACDF. There was less cephalad and caudal non-operative segment ROM in non-contiguous two-level ACDF compared to contiguous three-level ACDF.

Smoking is a well-known cause of impairment in wound healing and postoperative outcomes; however, its effects on treating meniscus issues remain unclear. This study assesses the relationship between smoking and meniscus treatment outcomes. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched from inception to 24 December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies examining smoking’s impact on patient outcomes regarding meniscus pathology. A secondary PubMed search targeted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the top ten orthopedic journals focusing on meniscus pathology and smoking as a demographic variable. Meta-analysis of six studies (n = 528) assessed meniscus failure rate based on smoking status. Eighteen observational studies (n = 8353 patients; 53.25% male; mean age: 51.35 ± 11.53 years; follow-up: 184.11 ± 117.34 months) were analyzed, covering meniscus repair, meniscectomy, allograft transplant, conservative care, and arthroscopy. Results showed four studies (36.36%) linked smoking with worse meniscus repair outcomes, while seven studies (63.64%) did not find significant associations. Meta-analysis from six studies showed no significant impact of smoking on repair failure (p = 0.118). Regarding meniscectomy, one study (33.33%) identified a significant association with smoking, but two did not. Only one (3.8%) of the RCTs in leading orthopedic journals included smoking as a factor. The evidence on smoking’s effect on meniscus treatment is mixed, necessitating further investigation.

The Lisfranc joint connects the forefoot to the midfoot. Tarsometatarsal (TMT) arthrodesis is commonly employed for Lisfranc joint injuries; however, there is active discussion regarding the optimal method of fixation for TMT arthrodesis. The purpose of this systematic review is twofold: to assess the stability of various constructs used in TMT arthrodesis and to evaluate joint motion and force distribution in the foot following arthrodesis. The PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles evaluating biomechanical and kinetic properties of TMT arthrodesis constructs in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The preliminary search yielded 367 articles and the final review included 14 articles with 195 cadaveric and 70 synthetic bone constructs. Plantar plates and intramedullary screw fixation at the first TMT joint were consistently found to bear significantly greater loads and resist diastasis more effectively than crossed screws. Furthermore, whole foot and lateral column arthrodesis significantly elevate calcaneocuboid and lateral column pressures. This increase was not observed with isolated fourth or fifth TMT arthrodesis. TMT arthrodesis should aim to avoid the lateral column and fuse as few joints as possible. Overall, plantar plates are an effective construct for first TMT arthrodesis due to their ability to withstand both compressive and tensile forces while maintaining stable alignment of the foot via reinforcement of the transverse arch. Intramedullary fixation devices are an alternative option that provide a high degree of active compression across the joint space while avoiding irritation of surrounding soft tissue structures.

Hallux valgus deformity (HVD) involves subluxation of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. While HVD is primarily considered a forefoot condition, midfoot instability may play a significant role in its development and severity. However, very few studies have placed a heavy emphasis on studying this phenomenon. Therefore, this review had a particular focus on understanding midfoot instability based on weightbearing imaging assessments of the TMT joint. This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched five databases for studies on midfoot instability in HVD patients. The severity of HVD was defined by hallux valgus angle (HVA) and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA). Data was extracted, and articles were graded using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). Of 547 initially retrieved articles, 23 met the inclusion criteria. Patients with HVD showed higher HVA and DMAA on weightbearing radiographs (WBRG) and weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) compared to healthy individuals. Midfoot instability was assessed through intermetatarsal angle (IMA) and tarsometatarsal angle (TMT angle). Patients with HVD exhibited greater IMA and TMT angles on both WBRG and WBCT. This review highlights the importance of weightbearing imaging assessments for midfoot instability in HVD. IMA and TMT angles can differentiate between healthy individuals and HVD patients, emphasizing the significance of midfoot assessment in understanding HVD pathology. These findings validate the limited evidence thus far in the literature pertaining to consistent midfoot instability in HVD patients and are able to provide ample reasoning for physicians to place a larger emphasis on midfoot imaging when assessing HVD in its entirety.

The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint is a frequently loaded joint, handling loads up to 90% of bodyweight. First MTP arthrodesis is a frequently performed procedure designed to improve pain in patients with degenerative MTP joint disease. There are a wide variety of fixation constructs for this procedure without consensus on the most effective method. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical integrity of various constructs utilized for first MTP arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 18 June 2023. Articles discussing the biomechanics of first MTP arthrodesis constructs were included. A total of 168 articles were retrieved. A total of 20 articles involving 446 cadaveric and synthetic bone constructs were included in the final review. Of the six articles comparing dorsal plating with compression screws to crossed interfragmentary screws, five found that dorsal plating had significantly higher stiffness. All three studies assessing shape-memory staples found them to be significantly less stable than crossed screws or dorsal plates alone. Both studies evaluating fully threaded screws found them to be stronger than crossed cancellous screws. Wedge resections have been shown to be 10 times stronger than standard planar or conical excision. Dorsal plating with compression screws is the gold standard for MTP arthrodesis. However, more research into newer methods such as fully threaded screws and wedge resections with an increased focus on translation to clinical outcomes is needed.

Motion-preserving options for the treatment of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) osteoarthritis are appealing, but the conversion to arthrodesis in failed cases comes with additional challenges. Loss of first ray length may not only lower arthrodesis success rates but can also cause aberrancies in the biomechanics of the foot and ankle. Selection of the proper graft for the restoration of length is crucial in order to minimize the chance of post-operative complications. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the optimal graft type for MTP salvage arthrodesis in terms of clinical outcomes, kinematic outcomes, and bony integration to improve patient care. A systematic review was performed using PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, and Web of Science from database inception until 20 June 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined clinical outcomes, examined different types of bone grafts, discussed impact of bone graft on lengthening, and articles related to first MTP arthrodesis salvage procedures. Data extraction relating to clinical metrics and kinematic metrics was performed and analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare graft types, such as (1) foot and ankle autograft, (2) non-foot and ankle autograft, and (3) allograft. A total of ten articles met eligibility criteria from 180 articles initially retrieved. Included patients (n = 164) had a frequency-weighted mean age of 55.2 ± 4.6 years with a frequency-weighted mean time from primary to salvage procedure of 36.6 ± 21.9 months and a frequency-weighted mean follow-up time of 42.7 ± 17.4 months. The non-foot and ankle autograft group had a mean length restoration of 4.4 ± 0.1 mm (n = 33, 73.3% reported) whereas the allograft group had a mean length restoration of 7.6 ± 3.5 mm (n = 49, 100% reported). The foot and ankle autograft group (n = 12 procedures) had an overall complication rate of 25.0%, the non-foot and ankle autograft group (n = 45 procedures) had an overall complication rate of 53.3%, and the allograft group (n = 49 procedures) had an overall complication rate of 10.2%. Preoperative AOFAS scores were lower but improved postoperatively, with the allograft group showing the highest postoperative scores, shorter time to union, and varying graft lengths among different autograft subgroups. The allograft group for salvage MTP arthrodesis has promise, as this group had the greatest mean length restoration and the lowest complication rate. This is the first systematic review examining different bone graft utilization for salvage MTP arthrodesis. More high-quality research is needed before solid recommendations can be made on this topic.