Search

Background/Objectives: Patients with treated solid tumors (TST) are a highly heterogeneous and difficult-to-treat population due to the risk of disease progression/recurrence or infection. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study at the Dermatology Clinic of Turin with a focus on the special population of cancer patients with psoriasis treated with biologics. Results: As of July 2023, 52 psoriatic patients with a prior/concomitant history of malignancy had taken biologic drugs. The median age was 67 years, and the median age of cancer onset was 55 years. The most common tumors were gastrointestinal cancer and melanoma. After the tumor diagnosis, 61% received an anti-IL17 drug; 37 patients continued the initiated biologic therapy, while 12 switched drugs due to secondary inefficacy. The estimated biologic DS was 55.6% at 50 months. Evidence suggests that IL-17 is a key pathogenic factor involved in tumorigenesis, resulting in a lower risk of malignancies in subjects managed with IL-17 inhibitors. Similarly, IL-23 plays a role in suppressing innate immunity and promoting tumor and metastases development. This is a consistent real-life case series that support the use of biologic drugs in patients with TST. Conclusions : IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors, being immunomodulators rather than immunosuppressants, may be a safe option for patients in an active oncological setting and for immune-correlated adverse events.

Background: Psoriasis (PSO) involves about 1-3% of the population, and around 75% of women develop PSO before the age of 40. Official guidelines on the treatment of woman with anti-IL17 and anti-IL23 during this potential childbearing time are not currently available. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of biologic treatments in women of childbearing age. Methods: At the Dermatology Clinic of the University of Turin, Italy, 172 women aged 20-55 years underwent IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitor therapy for moderate-severe PSO and were followed up to 52 weeks in a real-life, retrospective, single-center study. Results: Overall, 40% of patients achieved PASI 100 at week 16, and 72% at week 52. A similar trend was observed for PASI 90 and PASI < 3 with almost 80% and 90% of patients achieving the target at 52 weeks. As for PASI 100, a statistically significant difference ( p = 0.004) was found at 16 weeks, with 23.84% of patients achieving PASI 100, with IL-17 and 15.70% with the IL-23 inhibitor. No statistically significant differences were found at 28 and 52 weeks. No statistically significant differences in PASIs at any time points were recorded across the different biologic agents. Forty-six patients discontinued treatment. The most reported side effects were headache, nausea, asthenia, injection site pain, and rhinitis. Conclusions: This study showed that biologic drugs are effective and safe in women of childbearing age, with negligible side effects.

Background: Advancements in managing stage III melanoma have involved the implementation of adjuvant therapies alongside a simultaneous decrease in the utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB). Methods: This retrospective study from the University of Turin's Dermatology Clinic analyzed relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) among stage III melanoma patients (n = 157) who underwent CLND after positive SLNB versus those who did not receive such procedure. Results: Patients without CLND had a median RFS of 49 months (95% CI 42-NA), while CLND recipients showed 51 months (95% CI 31-NA) ( p = 0.139). The 48-month OS for non-CLND patients was 79.8% (95% CI 58.2-91.0) versus 79.2% (95% CI 67.5-87.0) for CLND recipients ( p = 0.463). Adjusted Hazard Ratios through inverse probability treatment weighting revealed the impact of CLND to be insignificant on RFS (aHR 0.90, 95% CI 0.37-2.22) and marginal on OS (aHR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13-1.21). Conversely, adjuvant therapy significantly reduced the risk of relapse (aHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.84), irrespective of CLND. Conclusions : This study corroborates the growing evidence that CLND after positive SLNB does not enhance RFS or OS, while emphasizing the crucial role of adjuvant therapy, be it immunotherapy or targeted therapy, in reducing the risk of relapse in melanoma patients with positive SLNB.