Search

Background: Scientific statements recommend multimodality imaging in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) to define the underlying cause., Aim: We evaluated the diagnostic yield of intravascular optical coherence tomography (OCT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the MINOCA setting., Methods: In this prospective, single center, observational pilot study, we enrolled patients with MINOCA without previous coronary interventions. All patients underwent three vessel OCT, followed by CMR. Imaging results were combined to determine the mechanism of MINOCA, when possible., Results: We enrolled 10 patients in this pilot study. Women constituted 50% of the analyzed population. The mean age of patients was 52 years. ST-segment elevation was found in 30% of patients. A possible culprit lesion was identified by OCT in 70% of participants, most commonly plaque rupture or erosion. An ischemic pattern of CMR abnormalities was identified in 70% of participants. Myocarditis and Tako-Tsubo were identified in 30%. A cause of MINOCA was identified in all patients using multimodality imaging, while using OCT alone identification occurred in only 70% of patients., Conclusion: In this pilot study, multimodality imaging with OCT and CMR identified potential mechanisms in all patients with a diagnosis of MINOCA, and it has the potential to guide medical therapy for secondary prevention.

Background: Whereas the efficacy and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) have been confirmed in de novo calcified coronary lesions, little is known about its utility in treating stent underexpansion. This study aimed to investigate the impact of IVL in treating stent underexpansion. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with stent underexpansion treated with IVL entered the multicenter IVL-Dragon Registry. The procedural success (primary efficacy endpoint) was defined as a relative stent expansion >80%. Thirty days device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) (defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel myocardial infarction) was the secondary endpoint. A total of 62 patients were enrolled. The primary efficacy endpoint was achieved in 72.6% of patients. Both stent underexpansion 58.5% (47.5−69.7) vs. 11.4% (5.8−20.7), p < 0.001, and the stenotic area 82.6% (72.4−90.8) vs. 21.5% (11.1−37.2), p < 0.001, measured by quantitative coronary angiography improved significantly after IVL. Intravascular imaging confirmed increased stent expansion following IVL from 37.5% (16.0−66.0) to 86.0% (69.2−90.7), p < 0.001, by optical coherence tomography and from 57.0% (31.5−77.2) to 89.0% (85.0−92.0), p = 0.002, by intravascular ultrasound. Secondary endpoint occurred in one (1.6%) patient caused by cardiac death. There was no target lesion revascularization or target vessel myocardial infarction during the 30-day follow-up. Conclusions: In this real-life, largest-to-date analysis of IVL use to manage underexpanded stent, IVL proved to be an effective and safe method for facilitating stent expansion and increasing luminal gain.