Search

Safe Trajectory planning for navigation guided biopsy (nBx) of motor eloquent tumours (METs) is important to minimise neurological morbidity. Preliminary clinical data suggest that visualisation of the corticospinal tract (CST) and its relation to the tumour may aid in planning a safe trajectory. In this article we assess the impact of tractography in nBx planning in a simulation-based exercise. This single centre cross-sectional study was performed in March 2021 including 10 patients with METs divided into 2 groups: (1) tractography enhanced group (T-nBx; n = 5; CST merged with volumetric MRI); (2) anatomy-based group (A-nBx; n = 5; volumetric MRI only). A biopsy target was chosen on each tumour. Volunteer neurosurgical trainees had to plan a suitable biopsy trajectory on a Stealth S8® workstation for all patients in a single session. A trajectory safety index (TSI) was devised for each trajectory. Data collection and analysis included a comparison of trajectory planning time, trajectory/lobe changes and TSI. A total of 190 trajectories were analysed based on participation from 19 trainees. Mean trajectory planning time for the entire cohort was 225.1 ± 21.97 s. T-nBx required shorter time for planning (p = 0.01). Mean trajectory changes and lobe changes made per biopsy were 3.28 ± 0.29 and 0.45 ± 0.08, respectively. T-nBx required fewer trajectory/lobe changes (p = 0.01). TSI was better in the presence of tractography than A-nBx (p = 0.04). Neurosurgical experience of trainees had no significant impact on the measured parameters despite adjusted analysis. Irrespective of the level of neurosurgical training, surgical planning of navigation guided biopsy for METs may be achieved in less time with a safer trajectory if tractography imaging is available.

Background: The role played by the non-dominant parietal lobe in motor cognition, attention and spatial awareness networks has potentiated the use of awake surgery. When this is not feasible, asleep monitoring and mapping techniques should be used to achieve an onco-functional balance. Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility of a dual-strip method to obtain direct cortical stimulation for continuous real-time cortical monitoring and subcortical mapping of motor and visual pathways simultaneously in parietal lobe tumour surgery. Methods: Single-centre prospective study between 19 May–20 November of patients with intrinsic non-dominant parietal-lobe tumours. Two subdural strips were used to simultaneously map and monitor motor and visual pathways. Results: Fifteen patients were included. With regards to motor function, a large proportion of patients had abnormal interhemispheric resting motor threshold ratio (iRMTr) (71.4%), abnormal Cortical Excitability Score (CES) (85.7%), close distance to the corticospinal tract—Lesion-To-Tract Distance (LTD)—4.2 mm, Cavity-To-Tract Distance (CTD)—7 mm and intraoperative subcortical distance—6.4 mm. Concerning visual function, the LTD and CTD for optic radiations (OR) were 0.5 mm and 3.4 mm, respectively; the mean intensity for positive subcortical stimulation of OR was 12 mA ± 2.3 mA and 5/6 patients with deterioration of VEPs > 50% had persistent hemianopia and transgression of ORs. Twelve patients remained stable, one patient had a de-novo transitory hemiparesis, and two showed improvements in motor symptoms. A higher iRMTr for lower limbs was related with a worse motor outcome (p = 0.013) and a longer CTD to OR was directly related with a better visual outcome (p = 0.041). At 2 weeks after hospital discharge, all patients were ambulatory at home, and all proceeded to have oncological treatment. Conclusion: We propose motor and visual function boundaries for asleep surgery of intrinsic non-dominant parietal tumours. Pre-operative abnormal cortical excitability of the motor cortex, deterioration of the VEP recordings and CTD < 2 mm from the OR were related to poorer outcomes.