Search

Peritoneal catheter dysfunction is one of the most frequent complications of peritoneal dialysis. The malposition of a peritoneal catheter may cause one- or two-way obstruction with fluid outflow or inflow problems, large residual volumes, and, therefore, reduced ultrafiltration and sometimes abdominal pain. Standard procedures may often fail to solve the dysfunction. Catheterography is an interventional radiologic procedure based on the infusion under aseptic conditions of iodated contrast into the peritoneal catheter, followed by the introduction of a guidewire into the catheter for guidewire manipulation. The available literature about catheterography is quite scarce and mainly based on case reports, case series, and small retrospective studies. In this minireview, we describe the guidewire manipulation techniques explored so far and their pros and cons. In addition, four interesting cases of catheterography performed in our center are also reported. In conclusion, in this minireview, the pros and cons of catheterography have been outpointed. Radiologic manipulation of peritoneal catheters may represent an effective and safe solution for malfunctioning peritoneal catheters and may also be exploited as "bridge therapy" to laparotomy in patients temporarily unsuitable for surgery. The advantages of this procedure are that it does not require long-term hospitalization and allows immediate resume of peritoneal dialysis.

Oxidative stress (OxSt) and inflammation are common in end-stage renal disease and dialysis patients; they are known risk factors for cardiovascular disease and mortality. In peritoneal dialysis (PD), OxSt and inflammation are even further increased compared to the already increased oxidative stress of their pre-dialysis phase. This is due to the high glucose-based solutions currently used, whose continuous contact with the peritoneal membrane can induce significant long-term morphological and functional changes (mesothelial to mesenchymal transition, thickening, neo-angiogenesis and fibrosis) of the peritoneal membrane. Oxidative stress plays a very important role in these processes, which may compromise the peritoneal dialysis procedure. There is, therefore, the need for more biocompatible dialysis fluids with polymers other than glucose to prevent and treat OxSt and inflammation. The most known and used of such glucose-free and more biocompatible peritoneal dialysis solutions is icodextrin, which has shown a protective effect from oxidative stress. This has supported the consideration of the use of glucose-free-based peritoneal dialysis fluids in order to reduce oxidative stress and improve peritoneal membrane survival. Studies investigating peritoneal dialysis with the use of osmo-metabolic agents (L-carnitine, xylitol and their combination) in peritoneal fluids replacing glucose-based fluids are, in fact, ongoing. They represent a promising strategy to reduce OxSt, preserve the peritoneal membrane's integrity and improve patients' outcome.

Managing mineral bone disease (MBD) could reduce cardiovascular risk and improve the survival of dialysis patients. Our study focuses on the impact of calcium bath exposure in dialysis patients by comparing peritoneal dialysis patients (PD, intervention group) and hemodialysis patients (HD, control group). We assessed various factors, including calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, PTH, vitamin D 25-OH, C-terminal telopeptide (CTX), and FGF-23 levels, as well as the calcium bath six hours before the blood sample and the length of daily calcium exposure. We enrolled 40 PD and 31 HD patients with a mean age of 68.7 ± 13.6 years. Our cohort had median PTH and FGF-23 levels of 194 ng/L (Interquartile range [IQR] 130-316) and 1296 pg/mL (IQR 396-2698), respectively. We identified the length of exposure to a 1.25 mmol/L calcium bath, phosphate levels, and CTX as independent predictors of PTH (OR 0.279, p = 0.011; OR 0.277, p = 0.012; OR 0.11, p = 0.01, respectively). In contrast, independent predictors of FGF-23 were phosphate levels (OR 0.48, p < 0.001) and serum calcium levels (OR 0.25, p = 0.015), which were affected by the calcium bath. These findings suggest that managing dialysate calcium baths impacts phosphaturic hormones and could be a critical factor in optimizing CKD-MBD treatment in PD patients, sparking a new avenue of research and potential interventions.