Search

This study evaluated and intercompared seven near-real-time (NRT) versions of satellite-based precipitation products (SPPs) with latencies of less than one day, including GSMaP-NRT, GSMaP-Gauge-NRT, GSMaP-NOW, IMERG-Early, IMERG-Late, TMPA 3B42RT, and PERSIANN-CCS for wet seasons from 2008 to 2019 in a typical middle–high latitude temperate monsoon climate basin, namely, the Nierji Basin in China, in four aspects: flood sub-seasons, rainfall intensities, precipitation events, and hydrological utility. Our evaluation shows that the cell-scale and area-scale intercomparison ranks of NRT SPPs are similar in these four aspects. The performances of SPPs at the areal scale, at the event scale, and with light magnitude are better than those at the cell scale, at the daily scale, and with heavy magnitude, respectively. Most SPPs are similar in terms of their Pearson Correlation Coefficient (CC). The main difference between SPPs is in terms of their root-mean-square error (RMSE). The worse performances of TMPA 3B42RT are mainly caused by the poor performances during main flood seasons. The worst performances of PERSIANN-CCS are primarily reflected by the lowest CC and the underestimation of precipitation. Though GSMaP-NOW has the highest RMSE and overestimates precipitation, it can reflect the precipitation variation, as indicated by the relatively high CC. The differences among SPPs are more significant in pre-flood seasons and less significant in post-flood seasons. These results can provide valuable guidelines for the selection, correction, and application of NRT SPPs and contribute to improved insight into NRT-SPP retrieval algorithms.