Search

The purpose of this study was to estimate the incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease (CD) in South-Muntenia, Bucharest-Ilfov and the Southwest region, using data collected from the main referral center in the area, during 2005-2009. Materials and methods A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted based on the 593 patients with CD admitted to the Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Fundeni Institute, during this period. The incidence and the prevalence were reported per 100,000 inhabitants aged over 18. Results The incidence and the prevalence between 2005-2009 were estimated at 0.49 /100,000 and 1.88 / 100,000 inhabitants respectively. They both described an oscillating trend between 2005-2009, increasing in 2009 by 32% (p = 0.036) and by 69% (p = 0.000) respectively, as compared to 2005. The sex specific incidence rates was slightly, but not significantly, higher among women (0.59) than men (0.49). The average age at admission was 44. A bimodal age distribution was noticed with two peaks: between 30-39 and 50-59 years old. The highest incidence rate was found in the urban areas (1.09) and Bucharest (0.7). The temporal trend analysis showed that incidence of CD does not suffer significant changes over the interval 2010-2014, predicting an annual incidence rate of 0.52 / 100,000. Conclusion Data collected in the main referral center for the South-Muntenia, Bucharest-Ilfov and Southwest regions during the last five years confirms the previously described low frequency of CD in Romania, the bimodal age distribution and later onset of disease. The male to female ratio is close to unity, suggesting that men and women are generally at similar risk. There is a significant increase in both incidence and prevalence of CD when comparing 2005 with 2009. In term of predicting trends, the incidence of CD appears to be relatively stable, whereas the prevalence understandably rises over the interval 2010-2014. A further prospective multicenter study is necessary in order to assess the precise incidence, prevalence CD in Romania and to make more accurate predictions regarding future trends. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical presentation in microscopic colitis (MC) is similar in many cases to that of diarrhea-predominent irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). The proper differential diagnosis requires total colonoscopy with multiple biopsies from normal-appearing mucosa and a detailed histopathological exam. Specific treatment may improve symptomatology. Aim: To evaluate the prevalence of MC in patients with an initial diagnosis of IBS-D, to analyse demographic and clinical features of MC patients and to assess the efficacy of specific treatment. Material and methods: Our retrospective study analyzed patients diagnosed with microscopic colitis in clinic during a three-year period. Diagnosis was established on histological exams of the samples obtained during colonoscopy in patients previously thought to have IBS-D. We evaluated clinical manifestations, time lapsed from their onset to definitive diagnosis, the association of MC with autoimmune diseases or with prior medication and the efficacy of treatment with budesonide or mesalazine. Results: From 247 patients considered to have IBS-D, 15 patients (6.07%) had actually MC (13 lymphocytic colitis and 2 collagenous colitis). MC was associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (3 patients), Lansoprazole (2 patients) and autoimmune diseases (6 patients). Watery, non-bloody diarrhea was present in all patients with MC. Other frequent complaints were nocturnal diarrhea (11 patients), abdominal pain (8 patients), abdominal bloating and flatulence (8 patients) and slight weight loss (6 patients). The diagnostic samples were obtained from the right colon in 6 cases and from rectosigmoid or transverse colon in 9 patients. Treatment was initial symptomatic in all patients, but there were 5 patients that required mesalazine and/or Budesonide, with favourable outcome. Conclusions: All the patients thought to have diarrhea-irritable bowel syndrome should be evaluated for microscopic colitis. Symptomatology is almost superimposable, but a few distinct features can be noticed. The proper and early diagnosis and the specific treatment may lead to significant clinical improvement in some difficult cases of the so-called "irritable bowel syndrome". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]