Search

Viral nuclear oncoproteins EBNA3A and EBNA3C are essential for the efficient immortalization of B cells by Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in vitro and it is assumed that they play an essential role in viral persistence in the human host. In order to identify cellular genes regulated by EBNA3A expression, cDNA encoding EBNA3A was incorporated into a recombinant adenoviral vector. Microarray analysis of human diploid fibroblasts infected with either adenovirus EBNA3A or an empty control adenovirus consistently showed an EBNA3A-specific induction of mRNA corresponding to the chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp70B/B′ and co-chaperones Bag3 and DNAJA1/Hsp40. Analysis of infected fibroblasts by real-time quantitative RT-PCR and Western blotting confirmed that EBNA3A, but not EBNA3C, induced expression of Hsp70, Hsp70B/B′, Bag3 and DNAJA1/Hsp40. This was also confirmed in a stable, inducible expression system. EBNA3A activated transcription from the Hsp70B promoter, but not multimerized heat-shock elements in transient transfection assays, consistent with specific chaperone and co-chaperone upregulation. Co-immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that EBNA3A can form a complex with the chaperone/co-chaperone proteins in both adenovirus-infected cells and EBV-immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines. Consistent with this, induction of EBNA3A resulted in redistribution of Hsp70 from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. EBNA3A therefore specifically induces (and then interacts with) all of the factors necessary for an active Hsp70 chaperone complex.

A yeast two-hybrid screen using EBNA3C as bait revealed an interaction between this Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-encoded nuclear protein and the C8 (α7) subunit of the human 20S proteasome. The interaction was confirmed by glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down experiments and these also revealed that the related proteins EBNA3A and EBNA3B can bind similarly to C8/α7. The interaction between these viral proteins and GST–C8/α7 was shown to be significantly more robust than the previously reported interaction between C8/α7 and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1. Co-immunoprecipitation of the EBNA3 proteins with C8/α7 was also demonstrated after transfection of expression vectors into B cells. Consistent with this ability to bind directly to an α-subunit of the 20S proteasome, EBNAs 3A, 3B and 3C were all degraded in vitro by purified 20S proteasomes. However, surprisingly, no sign of proteasome-mediated turnover of these latent viral proteins in EBV-immortalized B cells could be detected, even in the presence of gamma interferon. In actively proliferating lymphoblastoid cell lines, EBNAs 3A, 3B and 3C appear to be remarkably stable, with no evidence of either de novo synthesis or proteasome-mediated degradation.

Human B cells isolated from peripheral blood were activated and induced to proliferate by either Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) or the T cell-derived mitogens CD40 ligand (CD40L) plus interleukin (IL)-4. Although both populations initially proliferated as B-blasts, significant differences were revealed over a longer period. EBV infection resulted in continuously proliferating lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), whereas most of the CD40L/IL-4-stimulated B cells had a finite proliferative lifespan of 3–4 weeks. Cell cycle analysis, trypan blue staining and Western blot analysis for cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) all demonstrated that the decrease in proliferation in CD40L/IL-4-stimulated B cells is not due to cell death. Instead, these cells arrest, accumulate in G0/G1and undergo alterations in cell surface marker expression, cellular morphology and immunoglobulin production, all consistent with plasmacytoid differentiation. In contrast, B cells infected with EBV continued to proliferate and retained a blast-like phenotype. Differences in both cytokine production and the expression of cell cycle regulators were identified between the two B-cell populations, which might contribute to the differentiation of the CD40L/IL-4-stimulated B cells and suggest potential mechanisms by which EBV may overcome this. The study has also identified a window of opportunity during which a comparison of isogenic populations of EBV- and mitogen-driven B blasts can be made.