Search

Background: During the past decade, 18 F-fluorocholine (FCH) PET/CT has been continuously performed at Tenon Hospital (Paris, France) for the detection of hyperfunctioning parathyroid glands (PT)., Methods: A cohort of 401 patients, deliberately referred for HPT since September 2012, has been analyzed. The aim of this real-life retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic utility of FCH in this setting, overall and in subgroups according to the type of hyperparathyroidism (HPT), the context of FCH in the imaging work-up and in the patient's history: initial imaging or persistence or recurrence after previous parathyroidectomy (PTX). The influence of the histologic type of resected PTs, hyperplasia or adenoma, on the preoperatory detection on FCH PET/CT has been studied as well., Results: Four hundred one FCH PET/CTs were included in the cohort, performed in 323 patients with primary HPT (pHPT), including 18 with familial HPT (fHPT), and in 78 patients with secondary renal HPT (rHPT). The overall positivity rate in the 401 FCH PET/CTs was 73%. The PTX rate was twice greater in patients whose FCH PET/CT was positive than negative (73% vs. 35%). Abnormal PT(s) were pathology proven in 214 patients: only hyperplastic gland(s) in 75 cases and at least one adenoma in 136 cases; FCH PET/CT sensitivity was 89% and 92%, respectively. Similarly, there was no significant difference in patient-based sensitivity whether FCH PET/CT was performed as 1 st line or later in the imaging work-up, or indicated for initial imaging or for suspicion of persistent or recurrent HPT. Gland-based sensitivity was significantly lower for hyperplasia than for adenoma (72% and 86%, respectively). The lowest gland-based sensitivity value was 65%, observed in case of hyperplasia and when FCH was performed late in the imaging work-up. FCH PET/CT correctly showed multiglandular HPT (MGD) in 36/61 proven cases, 59%. Results of ultrasonography (US) and 99m Tc-sestaMIBI (MIBI) imaging were available in 346 and 178 patients, respectively. For both modalities, the corresponding sensitivity values were significantly less than those of FCH PET/CT (e.g., overall gland-based sensitivity 78% for FCH, 45% for US, 30% for MIBI) and MGD was detected in 32% of cases by US and 15% by MIBI., Conclusions: Although FCH PET/CT has been performed since 2017 as 1 st line imaging for HPT at Tenon Hospital (Paris, France), a large majority of patients underwent prior US and/or MIBI in their preoperative work-up. Therefore, a selection bias is very likely, as most patients referred to FCH PET/CT had non-conclusive or discordant results of US and MIBI, explaining the low performance of those modalities in the present cohort compared to published results. Nevertheless, the superiority of FCH PET/CT over US and MIBI in detecting abnormal PTs reported in various comparative studies is definitely confirmed in this larger real-life cohort. The detection with FCH PET/CT of hyperplastic PTs was somewhat lower than that of adenomas but was better than using US or MIBI. The present results lead to recommend FCH PET/CT as the first line imaging modality in HPT when it is widely available or, if less available, at least in HPT with predominance of hyperplasia and/or MGD.

Currently, the most frequent approach in the oncologic applications of positron emission tomography (PET) is detecting the hypermetabolic activity of the cancer tissue. A more specific approach, which may be complementary, is detecting the overexpression of receptors. In this review article, we aim to evaluate the results that are currently available for PET imaging of the sex hormone receptors in clinical oncology. The indication of PET and now PET/CT has been more disputed in breast carcinoma than in many other primary cancers (e.g., lung, head and neck, colorectal, lymphoma). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), the glucose analogue for PET imaging, has a limited sensitivity to detect the primary breast tumors in case of lobular or in situ forms or small sized tumors localised on systematic mammography, and to identify minimal node invasion in the axilla. Using 16α-[¹⁸F]fluoro-17β-estradiol (FES), a fluorinated estradiol analogue, PET is able to detect the over-expression of the oestrogen receptor (ER) in lesions, at a whole-body level. FES and FDG appear complementary for a better diagnostic performance in staging locally advanced breast cancer or restaging recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. Another potential indication is predicting the response to starting or resuming hormone therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, in relation with the ER status of all lesions revealed by FES PET. In two retrospective studies, FDG PET was also able to predict the response to hormone therapy, on basis of a metabolic flare, observed either after 7-10 days of treatment or during an estradiol challenge. A prospective comparison of those approaches is warranted. One study reported predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy thanks to a low value of FES SUV(max) or FES/FDG SUV(max) ratio. The presence of ER in uterine tumors, including the benign ones, in ovarian cancers or even in meningiomas, may have therapeutic consequences and FES PET could have a clinical utility in those settings; only initial results are available. The indication of PET and PET/CT has been even more disputed in prostate carcinoma, due to the lack of significant FDG uptake in most cases, at least before the castration-resistant stage. Using FDHT, a fluorinated testosterone analogue, PET is able to detect the over-expression of the androgen receptor (AR) in lesions, at a whole-body level. At least partly due to the rather large number of alternative tracers that are in development or even routinely available in some countries, few FDHT studies have been published until now. From absorbed dose values previously published for FES by the team of University of Washington School of Medicine at Seattle, and for FDHT by the teams of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center at New York and of Washington University at St. Louis, we applied the coefficients of ICRP publication 103 and calculated an effective dose per unit of injected activity of 0.023 mSv/MBq for FES and 0.018 mSv/MBq for FDHT. The radiation exposure is of the same order of magnitude as with FDG.

Various imaging modalities are currently available to diagnose bone metastasis. The two main anatomical modalities are computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with many variants proposed for the MRI procedure, including diffusion-weighted imaging. The two main functional modalities are scintigraphy and PET, also with many variants in the radiopharmaceutical, from the "all purpose" 99mTc labelled bisphosphonates to very selective radiopharmaceuticals for rare neoplasia. The diagnostic strategy will become more and more individually tailored according to the patient's clinical and biological data (primary cancer type, phase of the evolution, markers of aggressiveness, serum levels of biological tracers of bone metabolism, circulating or disseminating tumour cells …). If imaging is indicated, the diagnostic strategy will also depend on the availability and the diagnostic performance of the imaging modalities. Assessment of diagnostic performance requires comparative studies, performed with an adequate methodology. The main methodological weaknesses encountered in studies intending to compare imaging modalities for diagnosing bone metastasis are summarised. Comparative studies have been reviewed, which address the initial diagnosis of skeletal metastases in solid tumours except primary bone cancers. The results of more than 140 such comparative studies are then summarised and briefly commented, according to the type of the primary cancer, and according to the compared imaging modalities.

Aim: The aim of this paper was to compare the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with fluorocholine (18F) (FCH) or fluoride(18F) (FNa) for the detection of bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer complaining from osteoarticular pain, taking into account whether they were referred for initial staging or recurrence localization. The initial hypothesis was that FCH site-based specificity would be superior to that of F Na, with no loss in sensitivity., Methods: Forty-two patients were enrolled in this prospective study, underwent both PET/CTs and were then followed-up for at least 6 months. The standard of truth (SOT) about the presence/absence and location of bone metastasis could be determined in 40 patients, by 2 independent medical assessors, blinded to the results of both PET/CTs. The comparison was performed according to the guideline of the European Medicines Agency, i.e. based on the results of blind reading with SOT as reference., Results: Bone extension was present in 22 patients and absent in 18. Patient-based performance for FCH vs. FNa was 91% vs. 91% for sensitivity, 89% vs. 83% for specificity and 90% vs. 88% for accuracy (no significant difference). Of 360 skeletal sites, 68 were malignant and 292 non-invaded. There was no significant difference in site-based performance in the group of patients referred at initial staging, but in the group of patients referred for suspicion of recurrence, FCH was significantly more specific than FNa (96% vs. 91%, P=0.033 with Obuchowski's correction) while sensitivity was the same, 89%., Conclusion: Both radiopharmaceuticals, based on a very different metabolic approach, showed good diagnostic performance. If FCH is available, it should be preferred in patients after initial treatment.