Search

We have studied two new temporary pacing leads (Medtronic 6491 and 6492) intended for pacing after cardiac operations. The conductor has stainless steel strands coated with polyethylene connected to a 4' mm2 surface area, stainless steel, smooth, tapered electrode. A soft 4-0 coiled polypropylene fiber served as as fixation mechanism in the heart. The study included 15 children (aged 3 months to 7 years, body weight 4.4 to 20 kg) with a variety of congenital heart defects and 15 adults (aged 45 to 78 years) with coronary artery disease (n = 13) and aortic valve disease (n = 2). A pair of leads each was placed in a bipolar fashion in the right atrial wall and nonsystemic ventricle in the children (median implant duration 12 days) and in the right atrial wall only in the adults (median implant duration 9 days). The atrial current threshold values in children increased from 0.61 +/- 0.34 mA immediately after implant to 2.08 +/- 1.86 mA at explant (p < 0.002). In the adults the threshold values increased from 0.95 +/- 1.44 mA immediately after implant to 2.76 +/- 2.76 mA at explant (p < 0.002). In the ventricle the threshold values increased from 0.38 +/- 0.13 mA immediately after implant to 2.22 +/- 1.63 mA at explant (p < 0.002). Tissue resistance immediately after implant measured 809 +/- 182 omega at explant (children, p = not significant). Corresponding values in adults were 778 +/- 190 omega and 599 +/- 91 omega (p < 0.004). In the ventricle resistances changed from 1019 +/- 143 omega to 876 +/- 137 omega (p < 0.05). P wave amplitudes measured 1.8 +/- 1.5 mV immediately after implant and decreased to 1.6 +/- 1.2 mV at explant (p = not significant, children) and 2.0 +/- 1.3 mV to 1.8 mV (p = not significant, adults). R wave amplitude were 13.1 +/- 3.0 mV immediately after implant and fell to 8.7 +/- 4.5 mV at explant (p < 0.005). Thus, threshold values, tissue resistances, and electrogram and pliable amplitudes assured a safe pacemaker function. The small diameter and pliable texture of these leads provided a smooth surgical handling. They were found particularly suitable in children.

A newly designed temporary pacemaker lead (Medtronic Model 6400), which has a solid defined electrode surface area of 7.5 mm2, was compared with a multifilamental stainless steel electrode in common use (Davis & Geck, DG). Thirty-nine patients had both types of electrodes inserted intramyocardially in the right ventricle. A DG electrode fastened to the pericardium served as a reference lead. In addition to the standard Medtronic 7.5 mm2 electrode (n = 11), specially made Medtronic electrodes with areas of 5 mm2 (n = 10), 10 mm2 (n = 10), or 7.5 mm2 with platinum-iridium tips (n = 8) were studied. Measurements of myocardial stimulation threshold and resistance were made in both electrodes throughout the postoperative period. The patients' electrograms were recorded on magnetic tape for computer analysis of amplitudes and slew rates. The Medtronic 7.5 mm2 electrodes showed overall better results than 5 and 10 mm2 leads. Maximum stimulation threshold on the Medtronic 7.5 mm2 electrodes was medium 3.4 mA versus 10 mA on DG electrodes (p less than 0.001). The tissue resistance on Medtronic 7.5 mm2 was almost double than on the Davis & Geck electrodes (median 311 ohms versus 164 ohms on the day of minimum resistance, p less than 0.001). There were no significant differences in electrogram amplitudes between the two electrode types studied (5.52 versus 4.68 mV, p greater than 0.1), but the slew rates were significantly higher on the Medtronic (0.56 versus 0.37 V/sec; p less than 0.01). The new lead is an important innovation in temporary pacemaker lead design compared to the commonly used multifilamental leads.

A new temporary pacing lead. Medtronic Model 6400, with a defined electrode surface area of 7.5 mm2, has been clinically and electrophysiologically evaluated during bipolar atrial application in 20 patients after cardiac operations. A silicon disc was used for fixation of the electrodes to the right atrium in 10 patients, and an atrial plication technique was used in the other 10. Myocardial stimulation threshold and resistance were measured throughout the postoperative period. Atrial electrograms were recorded on magnetic tape for computer analysis of amplitudes, slew rates, and signal source impedance. No significant differences (p greater than 0.1) were found in myocardial stimulation threshold between the two fixation modes. During constant-current pacing, median threshold rose from 0.65 mA to 2.3 mA. Stimulation resistance, measured during constant-voltage pacing, fell from 567 to 365 omega, with a subsequent rise to 425 omega before electrode removal. Again no difference was found between silicon disc and plication fixation of the electrodes. P-wave amplitudes were significantly higher with plication than with silicon disc fixation (2.26 versus 0.86 mV, p less than 0.01), as were slew rates (0.34 versus 0.18 V/s, p less than 0.05). Signal source impedance had a magnitude of 6 k omega. The electrodes were used successfully in 12 (60%) of the patients for diagnosis and/or treatment of arrhythmias. We find the new lead well suited for atrial application.