Search

Background: Despite the promise of oral immunotherapy (OIT) to treat food allergies, this procedure is associated with potential risk. There is no current agreement about what elements should be included in the preparatory or consent process., Objective: We developed consensus recommendations about the OIT process considerations and patient-specific factors that should be addressed before initiating OIT and developed a consensus OIT consent process and information form., Methods: We convened a 36-member Preparing Patients for Oral Immunotherapy (PPOINT) panel of allergy experts to develop a consensus OIT patient preparation, informed consent process, and framework form. Consensus for themes and statements was reached using Delphi methodology, and the consent information form was developed., Results: The expert panel reached consensus for 4 themes and 103 statements specific to OIT preparatory procedures, of which 76 statements reached consensus for inclusion specific to the following themes: general considerations for counseling patients about OIT; patient- and family-specific factors that should be addressed before initiating OIT and during OIT; indications for initiating OIT; and potential contraindications and precautions for OIT. The panel reached consensus on 9 OIT consent form themes: benefits, risks, outcomes, alternatives, risk mitigation, difficulties/challenges, discontinuation, office policies, and long-term management. From these themes, 219 statements were proposed, of which 189 reached consensus, and 71 were included on the consent information form., Conclusion: We developed consensus recommendations to prepare and counsel patients for safe and effective OIT in clinical practice with evidence-based risk mitigation. Adoption of these recommendations may help standardize clinical care and improve patient outcomes and quality of life., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Specific recommendations for administering the influenza vaccine to patients with egg allergy are based on limited scientific data. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the safety of a 2-dose administration of an influenza vaccine to patients with egg allergy and to evaluate the usefulness of skin testing with the influenza vaccine before administration., Study Design: In this multicenter clinical trial, clinical histories of egg allergy were confirmed by skin testing with egg and, if possible, by oral challenges with egg. Subjects with egg allergy received the vaccine in 2 doses, 30 minutes apart; the first dose was one tenth and the second dose nine tenths of the recommended dose as determined by age. Subjects without egg allergy were recruited as control subjects and received 1 age-determined dose of the vaccine. Skin prick tests with the influenza vaccine were performed on all subjects., Results: From 1994 to 1997, 83 subjects with egg allergy and 124 control subjects were evaluated. The content of ovalbumin/ovomucoid was 0.1, 1.2, and 0.02 micrograms/mL, respectively in the 1994-95, 1995-96, and 1996-97 influenza vaccines. Results of vaccine skin prick tests were positive in 4 subjects with egg allergy and in 1 control subject. All patients with egg allergy tolerated the vaccination protocol without any significant allergic reactions., Conclusions: These results demonstrate that patients with egg allergy, even those with significant allergic reactions after egg ingestion, can safely receive an influenza vaccine in a 2-dose protocol when the vaccine preparation contains no more than 1.2 micrograms/mL egg protein.