Search

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Ashley Wysong is the recipient of the Institutional Research Grant for Castle Biosciences. There were no incentives or transactions, financial or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript.

Background: Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) will be increasingly used for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly given the recent approval of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Several barriers may prevent the uptake of NT and should be identified and addressed. We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine predictors of the use of NT., Methods: Using the NCDB (2006-2019), we identified 80,707 patients who underwent surgery for clinical stage II and III NSCLC. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were reviewed, and univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify associations with the uptake of NT. In propensity score-matched groups, survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among 80,707 eligible patients, 17,262 (21.4%) received NT. Clinical stage and node positivity were associated with receipt of NT. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with lower rates of NT included black race (odds ratio [OR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.90), Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.67-0.85), Medicaid/Medicare insurance (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.90), lower income level (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.71-0.87), and treatment at a community center (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.96). In an exploratory analysis, those patients who received NT had longer 5-year overall survival compared with those who did not (48.3% vs 46.0%; P < .001)., Conclusions: Rates of NT are relatively low for patients with clinical stage II/III NSCLC treated prior to recent chemoimmunotherapy trials. Socioeconomic barriers to the uptake of NT include race, insurance status, income, and area of residence. As NT becomes more widely offered, accessibility for vulnerable populations must be assured., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Statement Dr Stiles reports consulting fees and research support from Medtronic, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Pfizer, Arcus Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squib, BMS Foundation, Gala Therapeutics, and the Lung Cancer Research Foundation. Dr Chudgar reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca. All other authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Ashley Wysong is the recipient of the Institutional Research Grant for Castle Biosciences. There were no incentives or transactions, financial or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript.

Objective: To evaluate trends in the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and to compare overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing SBRT versus those undergoing surgery., Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients without documented comorbidities who underwent surgical resection (lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection) or SBRT for clinical stage I NSCLC between 2012 and 2018. Peritreatment mortality and 5-year OS were compared among propensity score-matched cohorts., Results: A total of 30,658 patients were identified, including 24,729 (80.7%) who underwent surgery and 5929 (19.3%) treated with SBRT. Between 2012 and 2018, the proportion of patients receiving SBRT increased from 15.9% to 26.0% (P < .001). The 30-day mortality and 90-day mortality were higher among patients undergoing surgical resection versus those receiving SBRT (1.7% vs 0.3%, P < .001; 2.8% vs 1.7%, P < .001). In propensity score-matched patients, OS favored SBRT for the first several months, but this was reversed before 1 year and significantly favored surgical management in the long term (5-year OS, 71.0% vs 41.8%; P < .001). The propensity score-matched analysis was repeated to include only SBRT patients who had documented refusal of a recommended surgery, which again demonstrated superior 5-year OS with surgical management (71.4% vs 55.9%; P < .001)., Conclusions: SBRT is being increasingly used to treat early-stage lung cancer in low-comorbidity patients. However, for patients who may be candidates for either treatment, the long-term OS favors surgical management., (Copyright © 2023 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is paucity of data on how gender impacts melanoma prognosis in pediatric and adolescent patients., Objectives: This study explores gender differences in presentation and survival among pediatric and adolescent patients with melanoma., Methods: The National Cancer Database 2004-2018 was queried for cases of primary invasive cutaneous melanoma in pediatric and adolescent patients (birth to 21 years) for a retrospective cohort study., Results: Of the 4645 cases, 63.4% were female. Median Breslow depth was 1.05 mm for males (interquartile range 0.50-2.31) and 0.80 mm for females (interquartile range 0.40-1.67; P < .001). Trunk was the most common primary site for females (34.3%) and males (32.9%). More females than males were diagnosed with stage I disease (67.8% vs 53.6%). Males had higher rates of regional lymph node positivity (27.9% vs 18.1%; P < .001) and ulceration (17.1% vs 11.4%; P < .001). Five-year overall survival was 95.9% for females and 92.0% for males (P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, male gender independently increased mortality risk (reference: females; adjusted hazard ratio 1.57; 95% confidence interval 1.32-1.86)., Limitations: Retrospective study., Conclusion: Males exhibited more aggressive pathologic features including greater Breslow thickness and higher ulceration and lymph node positivity rates. Male gender independently increased mortality risk., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Ashley Wysong is the recipient of the Institutional Research Grant for Castle Biosciences. There were no incentives or transactions, financial or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Background: Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) melanoma patients have higher mortality than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients. Treatment delays may contribute, but whether AAPI patients have longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (TTDS) is unknown., Objectives: Investigate TTDS differences between AAPI and NHW melanoma patients., Methods: Retrospective review of AAPI and NHW melanoma patients in the National Cancer Database (NCD) (2004-2020). The association of race with TTDS was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics., Results: Of 354,943 AAPI and NHW melanoma patients identified, 1155 (0.33%) were AAPI. AAPI patients had longer TTDS for stage I, II, and III melanoma (P < .05 for all). Adjusting for sociodemographic factors, AAPI patients had 1.5 times the odds of a TTDS between 61 and 90 days and twice the odds of a TTDS >90 days. Racial differences in TTDS persisted in Medicare and private insurance types. Uninsured AAPI patients had the longest TTDS (mean, 53.26 days), while those with private insurance had the shortest TTDS (mean, 34.92 days; P < .001 for both)., Limitation: AAPI patients comprised 0.33% of the sample., Conclusions: AAPI melanoma patients have increased odds of treatment delays. Associated socioeconomic differences should inform efforts to reduce disparities in treatment and survival., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Wysong is the recipient of the Institutional Research Grant for Castle Biosciences. There were no incentives or transactions, financial or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript. Drs Fernandez, Behbahani, Kwan, and Whitley and author Mata have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Dr Garg is an advisor for AbbVie, Aclaris Therapeutics, Anaptys Bio, Aristea Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Incyte, InflaRx, Insmed, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Viela Biosciences; receives honoraria; and receives research grants from AbbVie, UCB, and National Psoriasis Foundation. Drs Yan, Elias, and Sharon and Authors Duvvuri and Strunk have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Ashley Wysong is the recipient of the Institutional Research Grant for Castle Biosciences. There were no incentives or transactions, financial, or otherwise, relevant to this manuscript. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Objective: Segmentectomy has become an accepted procedure for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Adequate lymph node sampling, sufficient margins, and proper tumor size selection are factors vital for achieving outcomes comparable to lobectomy. Previous studies have demonstrated poor adherence to lymph node sampling guidelines. However, national trends in the quality of segmentectomy and implications on survival are unknown., Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with clinical stage I to IIA non-small cell lung cancer surgically treated between 2004 and 2018. Facility-level trends in extent of resection and segmentectomy odds of adherence to (1) 2014 Commission on Cancer guidelines of sampling 10 or more lymph nodes, (2) negative (R0) resection margins, and (3) tumor size 2 cm or less were determined. Propensity score matching was based on segmentectomy adherence to (4) a composite of all measures, and survival was evaluated with Cox models and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates., Results: The study included 249,391 patients with 4.4% (n = 11,006) treated with segmentectomy. The proportion of segmentectomies performed annually increased from 3.3% in 2004 to 6.1% in 2018 (P < .001). Overall, 12.6% (n = 1385) of patients who underwent segmentectomy between 2004 and 2018 were adherent to all measures, and adherence was more likely at academic programs (odds ratio, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.15) than nonacademic programs (P < .001, reference). Adherence to all measures was associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.79)., Conclusions: As segmentectomy is increasingly established as a valid oncological option for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer, it is important that quality remains high. This study demonstrates that continued improvement is needed., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest None disclosed.

Background: Current lymph node (LN) staging for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) does not account for the number of metastatic LNs, which is a primary driver of survival in multiple cancers., Objective: To determine the impact of the number of metastatic LNs on survival in MCC., Methods: Patients with MCC undergoing surgery were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The association between metastatic LN number and survival was modeled with restricted cubic splines. A novel nodal classification system was derived by using recursive partitioning analysis. MCC patients undergoing surgery in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program were used as validation cohort., Results: Among 3670 patients in the NCDB, increasing metastatic LN number was associated with decreased survival (P < .001). Mortality risk increased continuously with each additional positive LN when using multivariable, nonlinear modeling. According to a novel staging system derived via recursive partitioning analysis, the hazard ratio for death in multivariable regression compared with patients without LN involvement was 1.24 (P = .049), 2.08 (P < .001), 3.24 (P < .001), and 6.13 (P < .001) for the proposed N1a (1-3 metastatic LNs with microscopic detection), N1b (1-3 metastatic LNs with macroscopic detection), N2 (4-8 metastatic LNs), and N3 (≥9 metastatic LNs), respectively. This system was validated in the SEER cohort and showed improved concordance compared with the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition., Limitations: Retrospective design., Conclusions: Number of metastatic LNs is the dominant nodal factor driving survival in patients with MCC., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (TTDS) is associated with increased melanoma-specific mortality. Although black patients present with later-stage melanoma and have worse survival than non-Hispanic white patients, the association between race and TTDS is unknown., Objective: To investigate racial differences in time to melanoma treatment., Methods: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race with TTDS, controlling for sociodemographic/disease characteristics., Results: Of the 233,982 patients with melanoma identified, 1221 (0.52%) were black. Black patients had longer TTDS for stage I to III melanoma (P < .001) and time to immunotherapy (P = .01), but not for TTDS for stage IV melanoma or time to chemotherapy (P > .05 for both). When sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for, black patients had over twice the odds of having a TTDS between 41 and 60 days, over 3 times the odds of having a TTDS between 61 and 90 days, and over 5 times the odds of having a TTDS over 90 days. Racial differences in TTDS persisted within each insurance type. Patients with Medicaid had the longest TTDS (mean, 60.4 days), and those with private insurance had the shortest TTDS (mean, 44.6 days; P < .001 for both)., Conclusions: Targeted approaches to improve TTDS for black patients are integral in reducing racial disparities in melanoma outcomes., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with high rates of recurrence and metastasis., Objective: To evaluate predictors of sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity in MCC using the National Cancer Database., Methods: The National Cancer Database, from 2012 to 2014, was used to identify 3048 patients with MCC, of whom 1174 received an SLN biopsy. Predictors of SLN positivity were evaluated using logistic regression. Overall survival was evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model., Results: Of patients who underwent SLN biopsy, those with primary lesions on the trunk (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-3.17; P = .004), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.01-2.46; P = .04), or lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio, 3.45; 95% CI, 2.51-4.76; P < .001) were more likely to have positive SLNs on multivariate analysis. Overall survival was negatively affected by age ≥75 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.55; 95% CI, 1.36-4.77; P = .003), male sex (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.09-2.91, P = .022), immunosuppression (HR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.72-7.13; P = .001), and SLN positivity (HR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.98-5.04; P < .001)., Limitations: Lack of disease-specific survival and potential selection bias from a retrospective data set., Conclusions: Truncal MCC, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were independent predictors of positive SLNs. Overall survival was negatively affected by advancing age, male sex, immunosuppression, and SLN positivity., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) specimens are often obtained from patients for further staging after these patients have undergone melanoma excision. Limited data regarding predictors of SLNB positivity in thin melanoma are available., Objective: We sought to evaluate predictors of SLNB positivity in thin melanoma., Methods: Patients with cutaneous melanoma with a Breslow thickness ≤1.00 mm who received a SLNB were identified from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2014 (n = 9186). Predictors of SLNB positivity were analyzed using logistic regression., Results: In a multivariate analysis, patients <60 years of age (P < .001) and Breslow thickness >0.8 mm (P = .03) were at increased risk for positive sentinel lymph node (SLN). Moreover, on multivariate analysis, the presence of dermal mitoses increased the odds of SLN positivity by 95% (odds ratio [OR] 1.95 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.53-2.5], P < .001), ulceration by 63% (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.21-2.18], P < .001), and Clark level IV to V by 48% (OR 1.48 [95% CI 1.19-1.85]). Patients without ulceration but with dermal mitoses had 92% (OR 1.92 [95% CI 1.5-2.48], P < .001) increased SLN positivity., Limitations: Limited survival data are available., Conclusions: Younger age, a Breslow thickness >0.8 mm, the presence of dermal mitoses, ulceration, and Clark level IV to V are positive predictors of positive SLN. While the new American Joint Committee on Cancer system has removed dermal mitotic rate from staging, continued evaluation of dermal mitotic rate could be valuable for guiding surgical decision making about SLNB., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The stage of disease at initial diagnosis and the use of radiation therapy (RT) are important determinants of survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC)., Objective: To define factors that are associated with advanced-stage MCC at the time of initial diagnosis and the use of RT., Methods: Cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of patients with MCC registered in the National Cancer Database during the period from 2004 to 2013., Results: A total of 11,917 patients were identified; 3152 and 4586 patients were excluded from the staging and RT analyses, respectively, because of lack of available data. African American ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-2.10; P = .023), lack of medical insurance (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.40-3.30; P < .001), Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of at least 1 (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.34; P < .001), residence more than 26 miles from a treatment facility (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.35; P = .015), tumor located on the lower limb/hip (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.42-1.78; P < .001) or trunk (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.81-2.33; P < .001), and poorly (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.13-5.82; P = .024) or undifferentiated (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.36-7.15; P = .007) tumor histology predicted advanced-stage MCC at the time of initial diagnosis. The use of RT was associated with Native American ethnicity (OR, 5.04; 95% CI, 1.10-22.99; P = .037), tumor size between 1.5 and 2.7 cm (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.10-1.47; P = .001), electing not to have surgery (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.90-4.03; P < .001), positive postsurgical margins (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.18-1.63; P < .001), and receiving treatment at a comprehensive cancer program (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50; P = .020)., Limitations: Retrospective design limits generalizability of the results, and precise details of RT regimens utilized were not available., Conclusions: A number of factors are associated with advanced-stage MCC at initial diagnosis and the use of RT. Health care models should account for these factors, and efforts should be directed toward improving those that are modifiable., (Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The predictors of mortality, second surgery, and postoperative radiation therapy for treating dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) are not well described., Objective: We sought to determine the impact of patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment site and modality on survival after primary DFSP., Methods: A retrospective analysis of data from the National Cancer Database was performed for patients diagnosed with DFSP during 2003-2012., Results: A total of 5249 cases were identified. Of these, 3.1% of patients died during an average of 51.4 months of follow-up. After adjusting for relevant factors, lack of insurance, Medicaid and Medicare insurance, anaplastic histology, and positive postoperative margins all predicted mortality, while treatment at an Integrated Network Cancer Program predicted survival (P < .05). Higher odds of postoperative radiation therapy were directly associated with large tumor size, anaplastic and poorly differentiated histology, and positive postoperative margins and inversely associated with treatment at high volume facilities, and non-head and neck tumors. Higher second surgery rates were associated with Hispanic ethnicity, and lower rates were associated with female sex., Limitations: Survival data was not cancer-specific., Conclusion: Better understanding of factors affecting survival outcomes might help improve management of DFSP and delineate other potential causes of increased morbidity and mortality., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The ideal timing for melanoma treatment, predominantly surgery, remains undetermined. Patient concern for receiving immediate treatment often exceeds surgeon or hospital availability, requiring establishment of a safe window for melanoma surgery., Objective: To assess the impact of time to definitive melanoma surgery on overall survival., Methods: Patients with stage I to III cutaneous melanoma and with available time to definitive surgery and overall survival were identified by using the National Cancer Database (N = 153,218). The t test and chi-square test were used to compare variables. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis., Results: In a multivariate analysis of patients in all stages who were treated between 90 and 119 days after biopsy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.18) and more than 119 days (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22) had a higher risk for mortality compared with those treated within 30 days of biopsy. In a subgroup analysis of stage I, higher mortality risk was found in patients treated within 30 to 59 days (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.1), 60 to 89 days (HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.25), 90 to 119 days (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.12-1.48), and more than 119 days after biopsy (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.21-1.65). Surgical timing did not affect survival in stages II and III., Limitations: Melanoma-specific survival was not available., Conclusion: Expeditious treatment of stage I melanoma is associated with improved outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)