4 results on '"Lahr, Christopher"'
Search Results
2. Development of innovative techniques for the endoscopic implantation and securing of a novel, wireless, miniature gastrostimulator (with videos).
- Author
-
Deb S, Tang SJ, Abell TL, McLawhorn T, Huang WD, Lahr C, To SD, Easter J, and Chiao JC
- Subjects
- Animals, Electric Stimulation Therapy instrumentation, Gastroparesis therapy, Male, Stomach physiology, Swine, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods, Implantable Neurostimulators, Prosthesis Implantation methods, Wireless Technology
- Abstract
Background: Gastric stimulation via high-frequency, low-energy pulses can provide an effective treatment for gastric dysmotility; however, the current commercially available device requires surgical implantation for long-term stimulation and is powered by a nonrechargeable battery., Objective: To test and describe endoscopic implantation techniques and testing of stimulation of a novel, wireless, batteryless, gastric electrical stimulation (GES) device., Design: Endoscopic gastric implantation techniques were implemented, and in vivo gastric signals were recorded and measured in a non-survival swine model (n = 2; 50-kg animals)., Intervention: Five novel endoscopic gastric implantation techniques and stimulation of a novel, wireless, batteryless, GES device were tested on a non-survival swine model., Main Outcome Measurements: Feasibility of 5 new endoscopic gastric implantation techniques of the novel, miniature, batteryless, wireless GES device while recording and measurement of in vivo gastric signals., Results: All 5 of the novel endoscopic techniques permitted insertion and securing of the miniaturized gastrostimulator. By the help of these methods and miniaturization of the gastrostimulator, successful GES could be provided without any surgery. The metallic clip attachment was restricted to the mucosal surface, whereas the prototype tacks, prototype spring coils, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy wires/T-tag fasteners, and submucosal pocket endoscopic implantation methods attach the stimulator near transmurally or transmurally to the stomach. They allow more secure device attachment with optimal stimulation depth., Limitations: Non-survival pig studies., Conclusion: These 5 techniques have the potential to augment the utility of GES as a treatment alternative, to provide an important prototype for other dysmotility treatment paradigms, and to yield insights for new technological interfaces between non-invasiveness and surgery., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. An endoscopic wireless gastrostimulator (with video).
- Author
-
Deb S, Tang SJ, Abell TL, Rao S, Huang WD, To SD, Lahr C, and Chiao JC
- Subjects
- Animals, Gastroparesis physiopathology, Gastroparesis therapy, Gastroscopy, Prosthesis Implantation, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Stomach physiology, Swine, Electric Stimulation Therapy instrumentation, Gastric Mucosa physiology, Wireless Technology
- Abstract
Background: Gastric electric stimulation (GES) at a high-frequency, low-energy setting is an option for treating refractory gastroparesis. The currently available commercial stimulator, the Enterra neurostimulator (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN), however, requires surgical implantation and is powered by a nonrechargeable battery., Objective: To develop and test a miniature wireless GES device for endoscopic implantation in an experimental model., Design: In-vivo gastric signals were recorded and measured in a nonsurvival swine model (n = 2; 110-lb animals)., Intervention: An endoscopically placed, wireless GES device was inserted into the stomach through an overtube; the two GES electrodes were endoscopically attached to the gastric mucosa and secured with endoclips to permit stimulation., Main Outcome Measurements: Stable electrogastrogram measures were observed during GES stimulation., Results: Electrogastrogram recordings demonstrated that gastric slow waves became more regular and of constant amplitudes when stomach tissues were stimulated, in comparison with no stimulation. The frequency-to-amplitude ratio also changed significantly with stimulation., Limitation: Nonsurvival pig studies., Conclusion: Gastric electric stimulation is feasible by our endoscopically implanted, wireless GES device., (Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Novel application of GI electrical stimulation in Roux stasis syndrome (with video).
- Author
-
Daram SR, Tang SJ, Vick K, Aru G, Lahr C, Amin O, Taylor M, Sheehan JJ, and Abell TL
- Subjects
- Abdominal Pain etiology, Abdominal Pain therapy, Esophagus surgery, Female, Gastrectomy adverse effects, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Jejunostomy adverse effects, Middle Aged, Nausea etiology, Nausea therapy, Severity of Illness Index, Syndrome, Vomiting etiology, Vomiting therapy, Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y adverse effects, Electric Stimulation Therapy methods
- Abstract
Background: About one-third of patients undergoing a Roux-en-Y anastomosis develop Roux stasis syndrome, likely because of disordered electrical conduction. GI electrical stimulation has been previously used successfully in the management of postsurgical gastroparesis., Objective: Endoscopic placement of temporary electrodes and GI electrical stimulation in the management of severe Roux stasis syndrome in a patient with esophagojejunostomy and to determine whether the patient would be a candidate for surgical permanent electrode placement., Design: Case report., Setting: Academic medical center., Patients: This study involved a patient with Roux stasis syndrome., Intervention: Upper endoscopy was performed, followed by endoscopic placement of two temporary electrodes, one each in the two jejunal limbs. Electrical stimulation was provided by an external stimulation device. The patient was re-evaluated 5 days later., Main Outcome Measurements: Electrogastrogram (EGG) parameters including frequency, amplitude, and frequency-amplitude ratio and total symptom score and health-related quality of life score., Results: There was a significant improvement in EGG parameters with electrical stimulation. Also, the patient had a marked improvement in total GI symptom score, from 11 to 4, with a dramatic improvement in the health-related quality of life score from -3 to +3., Limitations: Single case report., Conclusion: Endoscopic placement of temporary electrodes is feasible and safe. GI electrical stimulation of the jejunal limb is a potentially effective treatment for Roux stasis syndrome., (Copyright © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.