1. Varnish with S-PRG filler reduces dentin permeability after erosive/abrasive challenge.
- Author
-
Machado RNS, Turssi CP, França FM, Amaral FL, Attin T, and Basting RT
- Subjects
- Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Saliva, Toothpastes, Dentin, Citric Acid, Dentin Permeability, Paint
- Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different varnishes on dentin permeability to erosive/abrasive challenges., Methods: 60 superficial dentin discs were randomly allocated to six groups (n=10): Duraphat, PRG Barrier Coat, Clinpro XT, Profluorid, Fluor Protector S and untreated (control). Permeability tests were carried out: after acid conditioning, after treatment, and after abrasive/erosive challenges. The abrasive-erosive challenges were performed for 5 days (citric acid and in remineralizing saliva), as well as abrasion with toothpaste slurry (Colgate Total 12). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained of the dentin surfaces (5,000x) after the treatments, and after the erosive/abrasive challenges., Results: Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests showed that all the varnishes promoted a decrease in dentin permeability directly after application, with Clinpro XT showing the highest percentage (69.52%) of dentin sealing (P= 0.0188). After the erosive/abrasive challenge, only PRG Barrier Coat varnish showed dentin sealing ability with reduced dentin permeability (42.16%) (P= 0.0014). However, none of the applied varnishes promoted a statistically significant difference in the percentage of dentin sealing, compared with the control group (P> 0.05). Clinpro XT showed a higher percentage of dentin sealing, while only PRG Barrier Coat showed reduced dentin permeability after the erosive/abrasive challenge., Clinical Significance: Varnish containing S-PRG filler has the efficacy needed to be used as a coating material to reduce dentin permeability in situations of erosive/abrasive challenges., Competing Interests: The authors declared no conflict of interest., (Copyright©American Journal of Dentistry.)
- Published
- 2023