1. An Assessment of Drag Models in Eulerian–Eulerian CFD Simulation of Gas–Solid Flow Hydrodynamics in Circulating Fluidized Bed Riser
- Author
-
Heehyang Kim, Dongjun Lim, Hankwon Lim, Mukesh Upadhyay, and Ayeon Kim
- Subjects
Work (thermodynamics) ,Cfd simulation ,General Chemical Engineering ,02 engineering and technology ,computational fluid dynamics ,Computational fluid dynamics ,lcsh:Chemistry ,Momentum ,circulating fluidized bed riser ,symbols.namesake ,020401 chemical engineering ,Fluidized bed combustion ,0204 chemical engineering ,business.industry ,eulerian–eulerian ,General Engineering ,Eulerian path ,Mechanics ,Solver ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,2D simulation ,General Energy ,lcsh:QD1-999 ,Drag ,symbols ,drag models ,Environmental science ,0210 nano-technology ,business - Abstract
Accurate prediction of the hydrodynamic profile is important for circulating fluidized bed (CFB) reactor design and scale-up. Multiphase computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation with interphase momentum exchange is key to accurately predict the gas-solid profile along the height of the riser. The present work deals with the assessment of six different drag model capability to accurately predict the riser section axial solid holdup distribution in bench scale circulating fluidized bed. The difference between six drag model predictions were validated against the experiment data. Two-dimensional geometry, transient solver and Eulerian&ndash, Eulerian multiphase models were used. Six drag model simulation predictions were discussed with respect to axial and radial profile. The comparison between CFD simulation and experimental data shows that the Syamlal-O&rsquo, Brien, Gidaspow, Wen-Yu and Huilin-Gidaspow drag models were successfully able to predict the riser upper section solid holdup distribution with better accuracy, however unable to predict the solid holdup transition region. On the other hand, the Gibilaro model and Helland drag model were successfully able to predict the bottom dense region, but the upper section solid holdup distribution was overpredicted. The CFD simulation comparison of different drag model has clearly shown the limitation of the drag model to accurately predict overall axial heterogeneity with accuracy.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF