Search

Research on wildfire risk can quantitatively assess the risk of wildfire damage to the population, economy, and natural ecology. However, existing research has primarily assessed the spatial risk of wildfires across an entire region, neglecting the impact of different land-use types on the assessment outcomes. The purpose of the study is to construct a framework for assessing wildfire risk in different land-use types, aiming to comprehensively assess the risk of wildfire disasters in a region. We conducted a case study in Central China, collecting and classifying historical wildfire samples according to land-use types. The Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) was employed to construct wildfire susceptibility models for both overall and individual land-use types. Additionally, a subjective and objective combined weighting method using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Entropy Weight Method (EWM) was utilized to build the wildfire vulnerability model. By integrating susceptibility and vulnerability information, we comprehensively assessed the combined risk of wildfire disasters across land-use types. The results demonstrate the following: (1) Assessing wildfire susceptibility based on different land-use types compensated for limitations in analyzing overall wildfire susceptibility, with a higher prediction performance and more detailed susceptibility information. (2) Significant variations in wildfire susceptibility distribution existed among different land-use types, with varying contributions of factors. (3) Using the AHP-EWM combined weighting method effectively addressed limitations of a single method in determining vulnerability. (4) Land-use types exerted a significant impact on wildfire risk assessment in Central China. Assessing wildfire risk for both overall and individual land-use types enhances understanding of spatial risk distribution and specific land use risk. The experimental results validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed evaluation framework, providing guidance for wildfire prevention and control.

Global Navigation Satellite System interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR), as a new remote sensing detection technology, can retrieve surface soil moisture (SM) by separating the modulation terms from the effective signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) data. However, traditional low-order polynomials are prone to over-fitting when separating modulation terms. Moreover, the existing research mainly relies on prior information to select satellites for SM retrieval. Accordingly, this study proposes a method based on empirical modal decomposition (EMD) and cross-correlation satellite selection (CCSS) for SM retrieval. This method intended to adaptively separate the modulation terms of SNR through the combination of EMD and an intrinsic mode functions (IMF) discriminant method, then construct a CCSS method to select available satellites, and finally establish a multisatellite robust estimation regression (MRER) model to retrieve SM. The results indicated that with EMD, the different feature components implied in the SNR data of different satellites could be adaptively decomposed, and the trend and modulation terms of the SNR could more accurately be acquired by the IMF discriminant method. The available satellites could be efficiently selected through CCSS, and the SNR quality of different satellites could also be classified at different accuracy levels. Furthermore, MRER could fuse the multisatellite phases well, which enhanced the accuracy of SM retrieval and further verified the feasibility and effectiveness of combining EMD and CCSS. When rm=0.600 and rn=0.700, the correlation coefficient (r) of the multisatellite combination reached 0.918, an improvement of at least 40% relative to the correlation coefficient of a single satellite. Therefore, this method can improve the adaptive ability of SNR decomposition, and the selection of satellites has high flexibility, which is helpful for the application and popularization of the GNSS-IR technology.