1. The effect of do-it-yourself real-time continuous glucose monitoring on psychological and glycemic variables in children with type 1 diabetes: A randomized crossover trial.
- Author
-
Elbalshy MM, Styles S, Haszard JJ, Galland BC, Crocket H, Jefferies C, Wiltshire E, Tomlinson P, de Bock MI, and Wheeler BJ
- Subjects
- Blood Glucose, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Child, Cross-Over Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin analysis, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents adverse effects, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 drug therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 psychology, Hypoglycemia chemically induced, Hypoglycemia prevention & control, Hypoglycemia psychology
- Abstract
Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) decreases fear of hypoglycemia (FOH) and improves glycemic control among those affected by type 1 diabetes (T1D). No studies to date have examined the impact of using do-it-yourself real-time continuous glucose monitoring (DIY RT-CGM) on psychological and glycemic outcomes., Methods: Child-parent dyads were recruited for a multicentre randomized crossover trial. Children with T1D were current intermittently scanned CGM (isCGM) users and aged 2-13 years. Families received either 6 weeks of DIY RT-CGM with parental remote monitoring (intervention) or 6 weeks of isCGM plus usual diabetes care (control), followed by a 4-week washout period, then crossed over. The primary outcome was parental FOH. Secondary outcomes were glycemic control using traditional CGM metrics, as well as a range of other psychosocial measures., Findings: Fifty five child-parent dyads were recruited. The child mean age was 9.1 ± 2.8 years. Although, there was no effect on parental FOH, -0.1 (95%CI: -0.3, 0.1, p = 0.4), time-in-range (TIR) (%3.9-10 mmol/L) was significantly higher with DIY RT-CGM over isCGM (54.3% ± 13.7 vs. 48.1% ± 13.6), mean difference, 5.7% (95%CI 1.8, 9.6, p <0.004). There was no difference for time spent in hypoglycemia. Parent diabetes treatment satisfaction was significantly higher following DIY RT-CGM compared to isCGM, mean difference 5.3 (95%CI: 2.3, 8.2, p <0.001)., Conclusion: The use of DIY RT-CGM versus isCGM did not improve parental FOH; however, TIR and parental satisfaction with diabetes treatment were significantly improved. This suggests in the short term, DIY RT-CGM appears safe and may offer families some clinically important advantages over isCGM., (© 2022 The Authors. Pediatric Diabetes published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF