Search

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a non-invasive method to assess pulpal blood flow (PBF). Dental fracture injuries have been associated with significant PBF reduction The purpose of this study was: (i) to evaluate whether the severity of outcomes of dental fracture injuries may be related to LDF measurements of PBF, and (ii) to investigate whether outcomes of dental fracture injuries may predict PBF levels. The relationship between outcomes and PBF measurements was analyzed in 72 permanent maxillary incisors of 52 consecutive dental trauma patients. The diagnostic outcome group comprised 72 incisors with a type I (absence of sensitivity, periapical radiolucency, and grey discoloration of crown) (n = 42), type II (loss of sensitivity) (n = 16), or type III (loss of sensitivity, periapical radiolucency, and/or grey discoloration of crown) diagnosis. At each session, when an injured permanent maxillary incisor was recorded, a contralateral homologous tooth was used as a control. An ordinal stepwise regression was completed to assess the degree of association between PBF measurements and diagnostic outcomes. A logistic regression analysis was used to compute the odds ratios for the outcome features for incisor non-injury controls vs two outcome groups: type II (n = 16) and type III (n = 14). PBF measurements that were significantly associated with more severe outcome were PBF levels of

Splinting of traumatically displaced permanent teeth has been described as an effective modality in the treatment of patients with dental injuries. The purpose of this study was to (i) investigate whether dental injury diagnosis may predict adverse outcomes occurring 96 weeks after splint removal, and (ii) evaluate whether the severity of adverse outcome is related to laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) measurements of pulpal blood flow (PBF). In 206 trauma patients, 273 permanent maxillary incisors treated by repositioning and splinting, and the respective contralateral homologous control teeth were investigated clinically and radiographically, and by LDF to assess local PBF values. Dental displacement injuries were classified as grade I (subluxation), grade II (lateral or extrusive luxation) and grade III (avulsion or intrusive luxation). Outcomes were classified as 'absence of loss of sensitivity, periapical radiolucency, and/or grey discolouration of crown', type I (loss of sensitivity), type II (loss of sensitivity and periapical radiolucency or grey discoloration of crown) and type III (loss of sensitivity, periapical radiolucency and grey discoloration of crown). An adverse outcome was defined as the presence of 'periapical radiolucency and/or grey discoloration'. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to compute the odds ratio (OR) for dental displacement injury for adverse outcome (n = 69) vs non-adverse outcome (n = 168). An ordinal stepwise regresssion was completed to assess the degree of association between PBF measurements and outcome groups. Significant increase in risk of an adverse outcome occurred with a grade II dental displacement injury (OR 14.3) (P = 0.000) and a grade III dental displacement injury (OR 19.9) (P = 0.000). PBF measurements that were significantly associated with more severe outcome were PBF levels of < or =3 perfusion units (PU) (OR 399.4) (P = 0.000), those of >3 PU and < or =6 PU (OR 100.5) (P = 0.000), and those of >6 PU and < or =9PU (OR 6.2) (P = 0.000). Diagnoses of displaced teeth predicted dental injury patients who went on to show adverse treatment outcomes of splinting. PBF measurements were related to the severity of adverse outcome.

Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) is a non-invasive method to assess pulpal blood flow (PBF). Dental injury has been associated with significant PBF reduction. The purpose of this study was (i) to describe PBF characteristics of teeth with specific clinical outcomes, and (ii) to demonstrate diagnostic characteristics for different threshold PBF values for detection of specific multiple adverse outcomes. In 80 trauma patients, a single maxillary incisor treated by repositioning and splinting, and the respective contralateral homologous control tooth were investigated by LDF to assess local PBF values. Perfusion units (PU) were taken in two sessions, on the day of splint removal (session I), and 12 weeks after splint removal (session II). The ability of session II-related PBF measurements at 2.9, 6.4 and 9.9 PU levels to identify adverse outcomes occurring 36 weeks after splint removal was investigated. Adverse outcomes were classified as type I (loss of sensitivity), type II (periapical radiolucency), type III (grey discolouration), type IV (loss of sensitivity and periapical radiolucency), and type V (loss of sensitivity, periapical radiolucency and grey discolouration of crown). Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of PBF assessments. There was a significant increase in PBF values from session I to session II (P=0.0001) for teeth without an adverse outcome, while teeth affected by a type II-V outcome showed a significant decrease in PBF values (P <0.05). PBF measurements did not change over time for the contralateral incisors (P >0.05). A type IV and V outcome occurred in 21 and 24% of the instances, respectively. The PBF of 2.9 PU demonstrated a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 93% for type V outcomes. The best likelihood ratio was found for the PBF 2.9 PU level and incisors associated with a type V outcome. The data suggest that the LDF test to be a valuable diagnostic adjunct for luxated teeth showing signs of adverse outcomes including grey discolouration or a combination of other signs. However, it may also become necessary to apply clinical decision-making methods in order to correctly evaluate the value of information gathered. The clinical implication is that LDF may become useful in the prediction of adverse outcomes at a much earlier time period than may be accomplished by standard sensitivity tests.