Search

Abstract Scanning tunneling spectroscopy (STS) and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) are perhaps the most promising ways to detect the superconducting gap size and structure in the canonical unconventional superconductor Sr2RuO4 directly. However, in many cases, researchers have reported being unable to detect the gap at all in STM conductance measurements. Recently, an investigation of this issue on various local topographic structures on a Sr-terminated surface found that superconducting spectra appeared only in the region of small nanoscale canyons, corresponding to the removal of one RuO surface layer. Here, we analyze the electronic structure of various possible surface structures using first principles methods, and argue that bulk conditions favorable for superconductivity can be achieved when removal of the RuO layer suppresses the RuO4 octahedral rotation locally. We further propose alternative terminations to the most frequently reported Sr termination where superconductivity surfaces should be observed.

Abstract Visualizing atomic-orbital degrees of freedom is a frontier challenge in scanned microscopy. Some types of orbital order are virtually imperceptible to normal scattering techniques because they do not reduce the overall crystal lattice symmetry. A good example is d xz /d yz (π,π) orbital order in tetragonal lattices. For enhanced detectability, here we consider the quasiparticle scattering interference (QPI) signature of such (π,π) orbital order in both normal and superconducting phases. The theory reveals that sublattice-specific QPI signatures generated by the orbital order should emerge strongly in the superconducting phase. Sublattice-resolved QPI visualization in superconducting CeCoIn5 then reveals two orthogonal QPI patterns at lattice-substitutional impurity atoms. We analyze the energy dependence of these two orthogonal QPI patterns and find the intensity peaked near E = 0, as predicted when such (π,π) orbital order is intertwined with d-wave superconductivity. Sublattice-resolved superconductive QPI techniques thus represent a new approach for study of hidden orbital order.

Abstract Complete theoretical understanding of the most complex superconductors requires a detailed knowledge of the symmetry of the superconducting energy-gap $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha$$ Δ k α , for all momenta k on the Fermi surface of every band α. While there are a variety of techniques for determining $$|{\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha |$$ ∣ Δ k α ∣ , no general method existed to measure the signed values of $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha$$ Δ k α . Recently, however, a technique based on phase-resolved visualization of superconducting quasiparticle interference (QPI) patterns, centered on a single non-magnetic impurity atom, was introduced. In principle, energy-resolved and phase-resolved Fourier analysis of these images identifies wavevectors connecting all k-space regions where $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha$$ Δ k α has the same or opposite sign. But use of a single isolated impurity atom, from whose precise location the spatial phase of the scattering interference pattern must be measured, is technically difficult. Here we introduce a generalization of this approach for use with multiple impurity atoms, and demonstrate its validity by comparing the $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha$$ Δ k α it generates to the $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha$$ Δ k α determined from single-atom scattering in FeSe where s± energy-gap symmetry is established. Finally, to exemplify utility, we use the multi-atom technique on LiFeAs and find scattering interference between the hole-like and electron-like pockets as predicted for $${\mathrm{{\Delta}}}_{\mathbf{k}}^\alpha$$ Δ k α of opposite sign.

Experiments indicate an abrupt change in the pairing gap near the nematic transition in the FeSe1−x S x iron-based superconductor. Here, Setty et al. propose to explain them via a novel spin-1/2 paired state with topologically protected zero-energy excitations over a finite area nodal surface.