1. Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients (≥60 years) with AML: changing everything to change nothing?
- Author
-
Martínez-Cuadrón D, Serrano J, Gil C, Tormo M, Martínez-Sánchez P, Pérez-Simón JA, García-Boyero R, Rodríguez-Medina C, López-Pavía M, Benavente C, Bergua J, Lavilla-Rubira E, Amigo ML, Herrera P, Alonso-Domínguez JM, Bernal T, Colorado M, Sayas MJ, Algarra L, Vidriales MB, Rodríguez-Macías G, Vives S, Pérez-Encinas MM, López A, Noriega V, García-Fortes M, Ramos F, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez JI, Costilla-Barriga L, Labrador J, Boluda B, Rodríguez-Veiga R, Martínez-López J, Sanz MA, and Montesinos P
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation mortality, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality
- Abstract
There are no studies analyzing how therapeutic changes impact on outcomes of older AML patients. This study analyzes patient´s and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of 3637 AML patients aged ≥60 years reported to the PETHEMA registry. Study periods were 1999-2006 (before hypomethylating agents-HMAs availability) vs 2007-2013, and treatments were intensive chemotherapy (IC), non-intensive, clinical trial (CT), and supportive care only (SC). Median age was 72 (range, 60-99), 57% male, median ECOG 1 (range, 0-4), secondary AML 914 (30%), with adverse-risk genetic in 720 (32%). Treatment differed between study periods (1999-2006 vs 2007-2013): IC 58% vs 32%, non-intensive 1 vs 23%, CT 0 vs 2%, SC 27 vs 28% (p < 0.001). Median OS was 4.7 months (1-year OS 29% and 5-years 7%, without differences between periods), 1.2 for SC, 7.8 for non-intensive, 8.6 for IC, and 10.4 for CT (p < 0.001). OS improved in the 2007-2013 period for IC patients (10.3 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.004), but worsened for SC patients (1.2 vs 1.6 months, p = 0.03). Our real-life study shows that, despite evolving treatment for elderly patients during the last decade, OS has remained unchanged. Epidemiologic registries will critically assess whether novel therapies lead to noteworthy advances in the near future (#NCT02606825).
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF