Search

Autologous stem cell transplantation is a standard treatment strategy for patients with multiple myeloma that requires effective mobilization and apheresis of peripheral blood progenitor cells; however, in the current era of novel myeloma induction therapies, the optimal mobilization regimen to enhance stem cell yield while limiting toxicity and resource utilization remains unknown. In this multicenter retrospective study, we assessed apheresis and transplant outcomes in myeloma patients mobilized with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n = 62), G-CSF with chemotherapy (n = 43), or G-CSF with the CXCR4 antagonist plerixafor (n = 417). Compared to patients treated with G-CSF alone, the plerixafor group required significantly fewer median apheresis sessions (1 vs 2, p = 0.0023) with higher CD34+ stem cell yield (9.9 vs 5.8 × 10 6 cells/kg, p < 0.001) and had significantly faster engraftment of neutrophils (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.03) and platelets (HR 2.24, 95% CI 1.69-2.96) after transplant. Additionally, the plerixafor group showed a significantly better toxicity profile and lower adverse event rate than patients treated with G-CSF alone (p = 0.0028) or chemomobilization (p < 0.0001), with a trend toward reduced survival in chemomobilization patients. Taken together, these data support the routine use of plerixafor-based mobilization to increase apheresis efficiency and reduce toxicity in myeloma patients undergoing transplant., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aprepitant when used prophylactically to prevent nausea and vomiting during cyclophosphamide-based conditioning regimens. The primary objective of this study was to determine if there was a difference in the number of emesis-free days in patients who received aprepitant as compared to those who received placebo. This prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study was performed in 40 adult patients who received a cyclophosphamide-containing HSCT conditioning regimen. Twenty patients were randomized to receive aprepitant, ondansetron, and dexamethasone, and 20 were randomized to receive placebo, ondansetron, and dexamethasone. Complete response (CR) was defined as the absence of emesis and the absence of mild to moderate nausea. The average number of emesis-free days was 14.25 (standard deviation 1.48 days) in the aprepitant group compared to 12.45 days (standard deviation 2.16 days) for patients in the placebo group. Eight patients (40%) in the aprepitant group achieved CR as compared to four patients (20%) in the placebo group. In the setting of cyclophosphamide-containing conditioning regimens, the addition of aprepitant to a standard antiemetic regimen decreased the incidence of emesis as compared to placebo. Aprepitant was well tolerated.

Plerixafor augments PBSC collection, but the optimal approach for incorporating it into mobilization is uncertain. Forty-nine consecutive patients mobilized with G-CSF alone were analyzed, and a day 4 peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count of 0.015/ml was found to predict for a day 5 apheresis yield of 2 × 10(6) CD34(+) progenitors/kg, our institutional minimum necessary for a single autologous transplant. On the basis of this relationship, a clinical guideline was developed which recommended pre-emptive use of plerixafor if the day 4 peripheral blood CD34(+) cell count was between 0.005 and 0.015/ml. A total of 166 consecutive subjects with lymphoma or plasma cell dyscrasias underwent G-CSF mobilization after adoption of this care pathway, and the mobilization failure rate was only 7% in patients managed per guideline. The median PBSC yield was 6.3 × 10(6) CD34(+) progenitors/kg with G-CSF (day 4 peripheral blood CD34(+) cell > 0.015/ml) and 4.9 × 10(6) CD34(+) progenitors/kg with G-CSF+plerixafor (day 4 peripheral blood CD34(+) cell 0.005-0.015/ml). The median number of days of apheresis was 2 in both groups. This clinical guideline is an effective mobilization algorithm that minimizes mobilization failures, reduces poor apheresis yields, does not require risk factor identification and is simple to implement.