Search

Although antithyroid drug (ATD)-induced agranulocytosis is a significant concern, its risks associated with long-term use and re-administration are not fully elucidated. Therefore, we performed this study to determine the incidence of ATD-induced leukopenia and G-CSF administration using administrative claims database. Retrospective cohort study. This study was performed using the DeSC Japanese administrative claims database. A total of 12,491 patients with newly diagnosed Graves' disease (GD) who received methimazole or propylthiouracil between April 2014, and February 2021 among 3.44 million patients in the database were included in the study. We measured the six-year incidence of leukopenia and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration. The incidence of leukopenia and G-CSF administration was 1.34% (168 patients) and 0.30% (38 patients), respectively. Leukopenia had a dose-dependent and biphasic incidence. The incidence of leukopenia and G-CSF administration was 37.2 (0.7%) and 8.0 (0.2%) per 1000 person-years during the first 72 days of ATD initiation, whereas it was 3.1 and 0.7 per 1000 person-years during the subsequent 6 years, respectively. The incidence of both outcomes was comparable between first administration and re-administration of ATD. The incidence of ATD-induced leukopenia and G-CSF administration was high in the first 72 days, with a reduced risk for at least 6 years thereafter. The incidence was similar between first administration and re-administration. ATD, a standard therapy, is often administered for a long period; therefore, our findings can guide the treatment of GD., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Cyclophosphamide (Cy) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is currently a standard regimen for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, cytarabine (AraC) in intermediate doses plus G-CSF seems to have a higher mobilization efficacy. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare mobilization using AraC and Cy. Thirty consecutive MM patients were mobilized by Cy + G-CSF, and the subsequent 40 patients by AraC + G-CSF. Both groups were comparable. The target yield of 10 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg (for tandem and 2 additional transplantations) was achieved in 98% (AraC) and 57% (Cy) of patients (p < 0.0001) by 1.2 and 2.1 apheresis (means), and by single apheresis in 83 and 17% of patients, respectively. AraC mobilization resulted in higher peak concentration of CD34+ cells in blood (median 238.0 vs. 87.9/µL, p < 0.0001) and higher CD34+ yield (median 28.6 × 10 6 vs. 10.4 × 10 6 /kg, p < 0.0001) compared to Cy mobilization. Toxicities were comparable except for thrombocytopenia gr. 4, observed in 50% of patients after AraC (Cy 7%). In view of these results, we conclude that mobilization with AraC plus G-CSF is very effective with acceptable toxicity and could be considered in MM patients with planned or expected higher numbers of transplantations.

The most common means of mobilizing autologous stem cells is G-CSF alone or combined with cyclophosphamide (CY) to obtain sufficient CD34+ cells for one to two transplants. There are few prospective, randomized studies investigating mobilization regimens in multiple myeloma (MM), especially after lenalidomide-based induction. We designed this prospective, randomized study to compare low-dose CY 2 g/m2 +G-CSF (arm A) and G-CSF alone (arm B) after lenalidomide-based up-front induction in MM. Of the 80 initially randomized patients, 69 patients were evaluable, 34 and 35 patients in arms A and B, respectively. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a yield of ⩾3 × 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells with 1-2 aphereses, which was achieved in 94% and 77% in arms A and B, respectively (P=0.084). The median number of aphereses needed to reach the yield of ⩾3 × 10(6)/kg was lower in arm A than in arm B (1 vs. 2, P=0.035). Two patients needed plerixafor in arm A and five patients in arm B (P=0.428). Although CY-based mobilization was more effective, G-CSF alone was successful in a great majority of patients to reach the defined collection target after three cycles of lenalidomide-based induction.

In 2007 the WMDA responded to the publication of two manuscripts suggesting a causal link between G-CSF and myeloid malignancies in healthy donors by convening an international symposium to examine this issue. At the time, registries reviewed the long-term follow-up of their healthy donors, which suggested no excess of leukaemia in PBSC donors compared with BM donors. Although the evidence for an increased risk of malignancy in healthy donors was felt to be weak, it could not be excluded. The WMDA, therefore, issued a statement, to be included in all donor consent forms, stating that it was unknown whether G-CSF increased or decreased the risk of later developing cancer. In 2012, with 5 years of additional donor follow-up and the results of several genetic studies now available, the clinical working group of the WMDA again reviewed the data. On the basis of an assessment of a continuing lack of evidence for an increased risk of malignancy in donors receiving G-CSF, the WMDA has re-issued a more reassuring statement. The revised statement was circulated to all WMDA member registries in late 2012 to replace the existing statement in consent forms, which now conclusively states that, 'Studies following large numbers of unrelated donors have shown that the risk of developing cancer within several years after the use of G-CSF is not increased compared with donors not receiving G-CSF'. Herein we review the evidence on which this statement is based.

The human recombinant G-CSF filgrastim has been widely used for the mobilization of CD34(+) stem cells of healthy donors (HD). In 2008, the G-CSF biosimilar XM02 (Ratiograstim, Tevagrastim and Biograstim) was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the mobilization of PBSC. However, there is limited experience in the application of biosimilar G-CSF for the mobilization of PBSC especially in HD. Therefore, we investigated in two cohorts (n=22), the efficacy and safety of PBSC mobilization by either biosimilar G-CSF or reference G-CSF. We observed a similar yield of CD34(+) stem cells as well as CD3(+) T-cells and nucleated cells in both groups and a safe engraftment in all patients with similar reconstitution of hematopoiesis in all hosts. In summary, we found a comparable efficacy and safety of biosimilar G-CSF when compared with reference G-CSF.

Before US regulatory approval, an expanded access program provided plerixafor to patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD) or multiple myeloma (MM) who had not previously failed mobilization and were otherwise candidates for auto-SCT. Patients received granulocyte-CSF (G-CSF) 10 mcg/kg daily and plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg starting on day 4 with apheresis on day 5; all repeated daily until collection was complete. Overall, 104 patients received 1 dose of plerixafor. The addition of plerixafor to G-CSF resulted in a median threefold increase in peripheral blood CD34+ cell count between days 4 and 5. Among 43 NHL patients, 74% met the target of 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median, 1 day apheresis, range 1-5 days); among 7 HD patients, 57% met the target of 5 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median, 2 days apheresis, range 1-3); and among 54 MM patients, 89% met the target of 6 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median, 1 day apheresis, range 1-4). Overall, 93% of patients had 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg collected within 1-3 days. Plerixafor-related toxicities were minimal. Engraftment kinetics, graft durability and transplant outcomes demonstrated no unexpected outcomes. Efficacy and safety results were similar to results in phase II and III clinical trials.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common RBC enzymatic disorder in humans capable of producing hemolytic events. Recently, concern has been raised about using G6PD-deficienct subjects as hemopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors. In a 10-year period, 101 consecutive HSC donors were submitted to donation procedures for transplantation inside their families in our Center. All donors were tested for G6PD and 19 (19%) turned out to be G6PD-deficient. The donors' safety and the effectiveness of these transplant outcomes were compared with those of the remaining 82 donors. No difference could be observed in any safety parameter between the two groups. No difference was recorded in donors' complications rates, in HSC production, in quantity of growth factor required, in Hb early drop or in Hb recovery. No difference was found in transplant outcome. From this retrospective analysis, we conclude that a G6PD-deficient but otherwise healthy volunteer can be selected as a HSC donor.

Autologous hematopoietic SCT (auto-HSCT) can be curative for patients with germ cell tumors. Poor stem cell mobilization jeopardizes the ability to deliver this therapy. Herein, we describe a retrospective study examining safety and efficacy of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF for patients with germ cell tumors who had previously failed stem cell collection. Overall, 21 patients with germ cell tumors and previous mobilization failure were remobilized with G-CSF (10 μg/kg SC) and plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg SC) beginning the evening of day 4 of G-CSF treatment. Dosing of G-CSF and plerixafor was repeated until collection of ≥ 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. Remobilization resulted in a median yield of 3.2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. A total of 17 (81%) patients collected ≥ 2 × 10(6) and 9 (43%) patients collected ≥ 4 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg in a median of 2 (range 1-3) and 3 (range 1-4) days, respectively. In all, 16 (76%) patients proceeded to transplant; 8 (38%) received tandem transplants. There were no serious adverse events. In summary, the majority of patients with germ cell tumors who failed prior mobilization with growth factors ± chemotherapy were remobilized with plerixafor plus G-CSF facilitating at least one auto-HSCT. Use of plerixafor plus G-CSF can increase access of this potentially life-saving procedure to patients with high-risk germ cell tumors.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been used to treat severe and refractory autoimmune diseases (ADs) in children and adults for more than 15 years. The aim of this treatment is to restore tolerance through an intense lymphodepleting conditioning, and many patients have achieved lasting remissions. However, HSCT is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is therefore not yet standard of care. Pre-existing reduced organ function of patients with ADs may increase the organ toxicity of conditioning. In the early post-HSCT phase, bacterial or fungal infections occur and therapy-associated lymphopenia sets patients at risk for reactivation of endogenous viruses and other opportunistic infections. During re-emerging of lymphopoiesis after HSCT, de novo autoimmunity may develop through loss of central or peripheral control mechanisms. Late effects of autologous HSCT (e.g., on the endocrine system) and a potentially increased frequency of secondary malignancies are of concern. The steadily increasing knowledge about specific complications occurring in patients with ADs after HSCT has led to the adaption of treatment protocols and has already reduced toxicity. Further prospective long-term follow-up studies are needed to identify patients at risk for developing serious complications after HSCT.

The use of etoposide (VP-16) for stem cell mobilization has been reported as a significant risk factor for the development of therapy-related myelodysplasia/therapy-related AML (tMDS/tAML) after transplantation. We compared the safety and effectiveness of VP-16+G-CSF (VP+G) to G-CSF alone for PBPC mobilization in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma who underwent autologous transplantation at the Cleveland Clinic and Ohio State University. In the VP+G group, median total CD34+ cells collected were 9.34 × 10(6) per kg (range 0.97-180.89), with 42% of all patients having adequate (2 × 10(6) cells per kg) CD 34+ collection after 2 days of apheresis compared with a median in the G-CSF group of 3.83 × 10(6) per kg (range, 0.72-50.38), with only 16% patients having adequate collection after 2 days (P<0.001). tMDS/tAML occurred in 15 patients (2.3%) in the VP+G and in 12 patients (3.8%) receiving G-CSF alone. (P=0.62). Increased number of days of apheresis was associated with the risk of tMDS/tAML (hazard ratio (HR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.30, P<0.001). Priming regimen was not a significant variable for relapse-free survival or OS. The addition of etoposide significantly improves the effectiveness of mobilization at the cost of an increased incidence of neutropenic fever though with no mortalities. There is no evidence of increased incidence of tMDS/tAML in patients receiving VP+G compared with those mobilized with G-CSF alone.

We describe 20 patients with myeloma and 1 with primary amyloidosis from 15 centres, all with advanced renal failure, most of whom had PBSC mobilised using plerixafor following previous failed mobilisation by conventional means (plerixafor used up-front for 4 patients). For 15 patients, the plerixafor dose was reduced to 0.16 mg/kg/day, with a subsequent dose increase in one case to 0.24 mg/kg/day. The remaining six patients received a standard plerixafor dosage at 0.24 mg/kg/day. Scheduling of plerixafor and apheresis around dialysis was generally straightforward. Following plerixafor administration, all patients underwent apheresis. A median CD34+ cell dose of 4.6 × 10(6) per kg was achieved after 1 (n=7), 2 (n=10), 3 (n=3) or 4 (n=1) aphereses. Only one patient failed to achieve a sufficient cell dose for transplant: she subsequently underwent delayed re-mobilisation using G-CSF with plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day, resulting in a CD34+ cell dose of 2.12 × 10(6)/kg. Sixteen patients experienced no plerixafor toxicities; five had mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms that did not prevent apheresis. Fifteen patients have progressed to autologous transplant, of whom 12 remain alive without disease progression. Two patients recovered endogenous renal function post autograft, and a third underwent successful renal transplantation. Plerixafor is highly effective in mobilising PBSC in this difficult patient group.

In G-CSF-mobilized hematopoietic SCT (HSCT), natural killer (NK) cells have a critical role in GVHD and GVL effects. However, regulation of NK cell response to G-CSF remains unclear. This study assayed G-CSF effects in both HSCT donors and NK-92MI cells. The donors who received G-CSF had significantly decreased NK cell cytotoxicity. Levels of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and phosphorylated (p)-Akt, but not mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), were downregulated in NK cells from G-CSF-injected donors. G-CSF also decreased cytotoxicity without affecting viability and NF-κB of NK-92MI cells. PI3K and p-ERK expression were also decreased in G-CSF-treated NK-92MI cells, and their inhibitors, wortmannin and PD98059, respectively, both enhanced the downregulation of cytotoxicity. These effects were accompanied by decreased expression of a cytotoxicity-related gene, triosephosphate isomerase (TPI). Wortmannin, but not PD98059, enhanced the downregulation of TPI in G-CSF-treated NK-92MI cells, indicating a correlation between PI3K and TPI. We conclude that G-CSF-impaired NK cell cytotoxicity may accompany PI3K/Akt signaling. The effect is transient and NK cells may recover after G-CSF clearance, suggesting that G-CSF-mobilized HSCT may benefit both acute GVHD prevention and late-phase GVL promotion in HSCT recipients.

Ancestim (r-MetHuSCF) is available in France for compassionate use in patients who are candidates for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation, and who failed in previous attempts at mobilization and collection. We report here data from 513 adult patients who benefited from this program, between January 1998 and July 2007. Given with systematic premedication, ancestim was generally well tolerated, although severe but not life-threatening adverse events were reported in 12 individuals. Overall, a graft was obtained or completed for 235 patients (46%). The median number of collected CD34+ cells was 3.00 × 10(6)/kg (range: 0.03-39.50). The target threshold of 2 × 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg was reached in 161 patients (31%). Factors associated with collection were diagnosis of myeloma, no previous autologous transplant, no more than one previous failed attempt and a mobilization regimen including cytotoxic agents. A total of 207 patients (40%) proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. The median time to reach 0.5 × 10(9)/L neutrophils and 20 × 10(9)/L platelets was 12 (6-40) and 13 (0-31) days, respectively. We conclude that a combination of ancestim with filgrastim successfully mobilized CD34+ cells in peripheral blood, and allowed adequate collection in preparation for autologous transplantation in approximately one-third of poorly mobilizing patients.

The use of erythropoietic agents has been associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), especially in patients with underlying malignancies. However, it is not known whether there is an increased risk of VTE associated with granulocyte growth factors. We reviewed 621 patients undergoing PBSC mobilization using granulocyte growth factors, alone or in combination with CY. Patients with a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis (AL: 114; 18%), multiple myeloma (MM: 278; 44%) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL: 20; 3%) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL: 209; 33%) were included. Symptomatic VTE occurred in six (0.97%) patients: two AL, two MM and two NHL. Of the six patients, two had pulmonary embolism, one developed deep vein thrombosis and three developed symptomatic catheter related thrombosis. Two patients with AL had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. We found a low incidence of VTE among patients undergoing PBSC mobilization.

SCF has been shown to synergize with G-CSF to mobilize CD34(+) PBPCs. In this study we report results from this combination after a phase II trial of 32 patients with malignant lymphoma randomized to receive recombinant methionyl human SCF (ancestim, r-metHuSCF) in combination with recombinant methionyl human G-CSF (filgrastim, r-metHuG-CSF) (experimental arm A) or routine chemotherapy plus filgrastim (conventional arm B). The primary objective was to evaluate the side effects and toxicity during priming and mobilization. The secondary objectives were efficacy by the level of blood-circulating PBPCs, the number of harvest days and the time to three-lineage engraftment after autografting. First, during priming 5 patients had 8 serious events, 4 in each arm. A summary of all adverse events revealed 30 (94%) patients suffering from 132 events of all grading. Second, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was documented in arm B. Third, 9/14 (64%) patients in arm A reached the target of 5 million CD34(+) cells/kg body weight (bw) compared with 13/15 (87%) in arm B. The results represent the first randomized trial of growth factor plus chemotherapy priming and indicate that a formal phase III trial very unlikely may challenge chemotherapy plus r-metHuG-CSF priming in candidates for high-dose therapy.

Plerixafor was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) to enhance stem cell mobilization for autologous transplant in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma. In this study, we present the first European compassionate use experience in mobilization failures, patients who are hardest to remobilize but were not included in registration trials. A total of 56 consecutive patients from 15 centers in Spain and the United Kingdom were included: age 60 (33-69) years; 29 men (32 with myeloma and 24 with lymphoma); 2 lines of previous chemotherapy (1-10); 73 previously failed mobilization attempts with G-CSF (28), chemotherapy plus G-CSF (43) or G-CSF plus SCF(2). Overall, 71% of patients reached ≥ 10 CD34+ cells per μL with plerixafor on day 5 after a 7.6-fold expansion from day 4. A total of 42 patients (75%) collected ≥ 2 × 10⁶, average 3.0 ± 1.7 (0.4-10.6) CD34+ cells per kg with plerixafor plus G-CSF. There were no severe drug-related adverse events. In all, 35 patients (63%) underwent transplant, receiving an average of 3.1±1.2 (1.9-7.7) × 10⁶ CD34+ cells per kg. All patients engrafted neutrophils (day 12; 13.4 ± 0.8; 8-30) and platelets (day 15; 18.5 ± 2.4; 8-33). In our experience, plerixafor offers an effective alternative to collect sufficient CD34+ cells for autologous SCT from patients who fail conventional mobilization methods, with good tolerance and a high success rate.

The high doses of chemotherapy used for the preparatory regimens before autologous blood or marrow stem cell transplantation leave patients at risk for neutropenic complications. The administration of filgrastim post transplant reduces the time to neutrophil recovery and therefore has become a standard practice at many institutions. In 2006, we implemented a practice change from filgrastim to pegfilgrastim. We present data on 164 consecutive patients (82 patients who received filgrastim compared with 82 patients who received pegfilgrastim) who received an auto-SCT between January 2006 and November 2007. Patients who received pegfilgrastim had faster engraftment (9.6 days compared with 10.9 days, P<0.0001), a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (59% compared with 78%, P=0.015), as well as shorter hospital stay, fewer days of treatment with i.v. antibiotics (6.3 days compared with 9.6 days, P=0.006), and fewer radiographic tests, which translated to an estimated total cost savings of over $8000 per patient. Overall, there were no differences in toxicity with these two agents. We conclude that a single dose of pegfilgrastim is a safe and efficacious alternative to daily injections of filgrastim and can be a cost-effective approach in auto-SCT patients.

Healthy donors (HDs) who were mobilized using lenograstim (LENO) and who were undergoing peripheral haematopoietic progenitor cell collection with apheresis (HPC-A) were enrolled in a surveillance protocol. In all, 184 HDs have been assessed with a median follow-up of 62 months (range 2-155). HDs received LENO at a median dose of 10 microg/kg (range 5-15). Bone pain was reported as the most frequent short-term adverse event (71.2%). Other commonly observed short-term symptoms included fatigue (19.0%), fever (5.4%), headache (27.7%), nausea (12.0%) and insomnia (22.3%). Spleen size increased in 4.3% of the donors. No vascular disorders or cardiac disease occurred. Long-term follow-up included monitoring of adverse events, neoplastic disease or other pathologies. Transit ischaemic attack occurred in one donor (39 months post-donation). One autoimmune event was reported at 28 months post-recombinant human granulocyte (rhG)-CSF (ankylosing spondylitis); one donor with a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease developed secondary polyglobulia (50 months post-rhG-CSF). One donor was diagnosed with lung cancer at 19 months post-donation. No haematological disease was observed. In conclusion, the short-term safety appears to be verified, whereas, although the study identified no increased risks of malignancy among HDs who received rhG-CSF, long-term safety requires more complete data sets, especially a longer follow-up and a larger number of HDs.

After hematopoietic SCT (HSCT), G-CSF is commonly used to enhance stem cell engraftment to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with prolonged neutropenia. However, there is no consensus on the optimal use of G-CSF after high-dose chemotherapy followed by HSCT. This review was performed to evaluate the evidence regarding the use of G-CSF after autologous and allogeneic HSCT. Studies investigating the use of G-CSF in comparison to control (observation or placebo), early vs delayed initiation of G-CSF, and other approaches driven by patient-specific parameters to identify optimal use of G-CSF have been reviewed. Various outcomes such as neutrophil and platelet engraftment, post-transplant length of hospital stay, post-transplant complications such as infection and GVHD, and survival have been assessed. Finally, we provide the level of evidence for each of the outcomes analyzed while evaluating strategies for using G-CSF in patients undergoing autologous or allogeneic HSCT.

The efficacy of pegfilgrastim+/-chemotherapy for mobilizing stem cells in patients with solid tumours was assessed. In cycle 0, a 14-day prechemotherapy cycle, patients (N=61) were randomized open-label to single doses of pegfilgrastim (6, 12 or 18 mg) on day 1, or daily filgrastim (10 microg/kg) for < or =7 days. Mean peak peripheral CD34+ cell counts increased with pegfilgrastim dose, but were significantly higher than filgrastim only at the 18 mg dose (10.17 vs 4.96 x 10(4)/ml; P=0.014). In the clinically relevant period of days 3-7, both 12 and 18 mg pegfilgrastim doses produced significantly higher peak CD34+ counts (8.18 and 9.96 vs 4.51 x 10(4)/ml for filgrastim; P=0.034 and 0.006). In cycle 1, patients received carboplatin/paclitaxel on day 1, followed from day 2 by pegfilgrastim 6-18 mg or daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day for < or =14 days) as per randomization in cycle 0. There were no significant differences in mean peak CD34+ count between pegfilgrastim and filgrastim, but there was an advantage for pegfilgrastim 18 mg in the relevant period of days 7-12 (3.14 vs 1.19 x 10(4)/ml; P=0.043). A single pegfilgrastim dose (> or =6 mg) could be substituted for daily filgrastim in cytokine-only peripheral CD34+ cell mobilization.

Mobilized allogeneic PBPC are increasingly used instead of BM for allogeneic stem cell grafting. Although the short-term safety profile of recombinant human (rh)G-CSF seems acceptable, only minimal data on long-term safety are available. We therefore reviewed data on 171 sibling donors (M/F: 98/73) with respect to side effects of rhG-CSF and PBPC collection and impact on quality of life (QoL) and health status. In a cross-sectional study, we investigated the actual QoL and health status of the donors as well as the need for medical treatment since PBPC donation by a questionnaire that was sent to 151 donors. Ninety-five (64%) of the addressed donors responded to the questionnaire, but only 69 (46%) of them reported on their actual health status and QoL, which was good to very good in the majority of them. Two donors developed malignancies in the post-donation course. In general, PBPC collection after rhG-CSF mobilization was well tolerated by the responding donors. Although the reported events in medical history after PBPC donation do not seem to be associated with rhG-CSF administration or the collection procedure, a lifelong follow-up of donors should be obligatory.

The cytokine G-CSF stimulates myeloid progenitors and is routinely used to accelerate neutrophil recovery in the treatment of hematological malignancy and blood or marrow transplantation. Despite significant reductions in the frequency and duration of febrile neutropenia episodes, infections and the length of hospitalization, filgrastim has never been conclusively proven to produce a survival benefit in allogeneic HSCT and is considered a supportive measure. In this review, we analyze the conflicting evidence and appraise the utility of G-CSF in allogeneic HSCT. G-CSF administration after allogeneic HSCT needs to take into consideration the impact on immune reconstitution, risk of leukemic progression in patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities and the absence of proven benefit in patients receiving marrow or peripheral blood progenitors as the stem cell source.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of an injection of 100 microg/kg of pegfilgrastim in haematopoietic recovery and mobilization in children following 32 courses of chemotherapy. End points were duration of neutropaenia, myeloid recovery and PBMC collection. Neutropaenia lasted a mean of 4.7 days (+/-2.13 days). Myeloid recovery occurred at a median of 10 days (inter quartile range (IQR) 8-11). Febrile neutropaenia complicated 13 courses (40.6%). Mobilization was observed in 20 out of 26 assessable courses (76.9%). The rise in CD34+ cells occurred at a median of 6 days (IQR 4-7) after PEG and remained >20 per microl for 6 days (IQR 4-8), with a median value of 80 per microl (IQR 48-170.5). The median CD34+ cell peak was 165 per microl (IQR 82.5-331), 9 days (range 6-14) after PEG. PBMC were collected on average at day +5 (+4 to +9) after PEG. In 93.3% of collections, at least 3 x 10(6) per kg CD34+ cells were collected through a single apheresis. Myeloid recovery occurred in all cases within 15 days, without concomitant thrombocytopaenia. The incidence of primary febrile episodes is in line with data in the literature and with our own historical experience. A long-lasting period of circulating CD34+ cells allowed for more accurate scheduling of apheresis.

The experience at a single institution of BM harvesting (BMH) in general anesthetic for allogeneic transplantation from 49 healthy adult donors since March 2002 is presented in detail, together with an analysis of all the donor complications. In this study, we analyzed the advantages through the change from an aspiration needle with one hole (group A, n=18) to a system with additional five side holes (group B, n=31) in April 2005 for faster aspiration of large volumes of BM. In group B, the operation time was reduced by 50%, which is 12 min to date (1006 ml BM). Furthermore, the collection rate (volume BM/time) was significantly increased, namely to 81.9 ml/min in group B. The yields of total nucleated cells and CD34+ cells are nearly identical and adequate in both systems. The proportion of donors treated as day cases--that is, able to be discharged on the same day as the procedure--was 56% in group A and 81% in group B. There was no significant operative site morbidity. BMH accomplished by trained personal is a safe procedure for healthy adult donors on an outpatient basis as standard in our collection center.

Stem cell transplantation is increasingly used in the management of immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (AL). It is considered the standard of care to administer growth factors to accelerate neutrophil recovery after transplantation. However, unique toxicities occur with growth factor use in patients with AL who receive a stem cell transplant. We report a cohort of patients who underwent transplantation without receiving posttransplantation growth factors. In total, 282 patients received a stem cell transplant. A neutrophil count of 500/mul was achieved in 50, 75 and 90% of patients at 14, 16 and 22 days, respectively. A platelet count of 20 000/mul was achieved in 50, 75 and 90% of patients at 14, 20 and 31 days, respectively. Non-staphylococcal bacteremia was detected in 16% of patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days. It is feasible and reasonable to withhold growth factor therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with AL.

Peg-filgrastim is a form of G-CSF with a sustained duration of action due to self-limited clearance. We administered 6 mg peg-filgrastim to 18 autograft recipients on day +1 after transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery and clinical outcomes were compared to the historical data of 54 patients not receiving G-CSF. Patients receiving peg-filgrastim achieved a serum level of 115 000 pg/ml on day +2, 24 h after drug administration. Drug level maintained a plateau until day +8 and, after day +10, declined concomitantly with myeloid recovery. Patients experienced prompt neutrophil recovery: days +9 and +10 to 500 and 1000 neutrophils per microliter, and 4 days with an absolute neutrophil count <100 cells per microliter. Duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly shortened, but we did not observe significant differences in other end points. In conclusion, peg-filgrastim was well tolerated and efficacious, and hastened myeloid recovery.

Recipients of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor/granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor are not only individuals with underlying disorders, but also healthy donors undergoing peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization. In addition to the known adverse effects associated with G-CSF, complications such as splenic rupture have also been reported. A review of the English literature, with addition of a patient with plasma cell myeloma, reveals that splenic rupture occurs not only in patients with underlying disease, but also in healthy PBPC donors. Although the cause of splenic rupture does not appear to be associated with any specific condition, physicians should be alerted to the possibility of this potentially fatal complication in individuals receiving G-CSF therapy.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely administered to donors who provide peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) for individuals who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplants. Questions have been raised about the safety of G-CSF in this setting. Herein, the Research on Adverse Drug Events and Reports (RADAR) project investigators reviewed the literature on G-CSF-associated adverse events in healthy individuals or persons with chronic neutropenia or cancer. Toxicities identified included bone pain and rare instances of splenic rupture, allergic reactions, flares of underlying autoimmune disorders, lung injury and vascular events. Among healthy individuals, four patients developed splenic rupture shortly after G-CSF administration and three patients developed acute myeloid leukemia 1 to 5 years after G-CSF administration. Registry studies identified no increased risks of malignancy among healthy individuals who received G-CSF before PBSC harvesting. However, more than 2000 donors would have to be followed for 10 years to detect a 10-fold increase in leukemia risk. Our review identifies bone pain as the most common toxicity of G-CSF administration. There are questions about a causal relationship between G-CSF administration and acute leukemia, but more long-term safety data from database registries are needed to adequately evaluate such a relationship.

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous blood stem cell transplantation is the standard treatment for myeloma patients. In this study, CAD (cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, dexamethasone) chemotherapy and a single dose of pegfilgrastim (12 mg) was highly effective in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for subsequent transplantation, with 88% of patients (n = 26) achieving the CD34+ cell harvest target of > or = 7.50 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight, following a median of two apheresis procedures (range 1-4) and with first apheresis performed at a median day 13 after CAD application (range 10-20). Patients treated with pegfilgrastim showed a reduced time to first apheresis procedure from mobilization compared with filgrastim-mobilized historical matched controls (n = 52, P = 0.015). The pegfilgrastim mobilization regimen allowed for transplantation of a median of 3.58 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg body weight while leaving sufficient stored cells for a second high-dose regimen and back-ups in most patients. Engraftment following transplantation was comparable to filgrastim, with a median time of 14 days to leucocyte > or =1.0 x 10(9)/l (range 10-21) and 11 days to platelets > or = 20 x 10(9)/l (range 0-15). The results of this study thus provide further support for the clinical utility of pegfilgrastim for the mobilization of PBSC following chemotherapy in cancer patients scheduled for transplantation.

Currently, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) remains the standard mobilizing agent for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) donors, allowing the safe collection of adequate PBSCs from the vast majority of donors. However, G-CSF mobilization can be associated with some significant side effects and requires a multi-day dosing regimen. The other cytokine approved for stem cell mobilization, granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), alters graft composition and may reduce the development of graft-versus-host disease, but a significant minority of donors fails to provide sufficient CD34+ cells with GM-CSF and some experience unacceptable toxicity. AMD3100 is a promising new mobilizing agent, which may have several advantages over G-CSF for donor mobilization. As it is a direct antagonist of the interaction between the chemokine stromal-derived factor-1 and its receptor CXCR4, AMD3100 mobilizes PBSCs within hours rather than days. It is also well tolerated, with no significant side effects reported in any of the clinical trials to date. Studies of autologous and allogeneic transplantation of AMD3100 mobilized grafts have demonstrated prompt and stable engraftment. Here, we review the current state of stem cell mobilization in normal donors and discuss novel strategies for donor stem cell mobilization.

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of total body irradiation (TBI) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-combined high-dose cytarabine as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We evaluated 22 patients with advanced MDS, including refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB; n=10), RAEB in transformation (n=2), acute myelogenous leukemia transformed from MDS (n=6) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n=4). The conditioning regimen consisted of 12 Gy of TBI and high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m(2)) every 12 h for 4 days, and the cytarabine was combined with continuous administration of G-CSF. The stem cell sources were bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells from human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-identical siblings (n=12) and bone marrow from HLA serologically matched unrelated donors (n=10). Three patients experienced disease relapse, two of whom died of disease progression. Of 22 patients, 16 are currently alive and disease-free. The 5-year estimated overall survival, disease-free survival, relapse and non-relapse mortality rates are 76.7, 72.2, 16.6 and 14.1%, respectively. These results suggest that G-CSF-combined high-dose cytarabine could be a promising component of the conditioning regimen of allogeneic HSCT for advanced MDS, providing a low incidence of both relapse and treatment-related mortality.

A phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial was conducted in order to compare the incidence of microbiologically defined infections occurring after high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and ASCT in 98 patients given lenograstim (Granocyte) and 94 patients given placebo after transplantation. Hematopoietic recovery, the use of i.v. antibiotics, the numbers of red blood cell and platelet transfusions, the days spent in hospital, and the days on parenteral nutrition were also compared. The incidence of infections until neutrophil recovery was significantly less in patients who received lenograstim after HDT and ASCT as compared to patients who received placebo (66 of 98 vs 86 of 94 patients, P<0.001). Lenograstim also significantly reduced the use of i.v. antibiotics (P<0.001) and the median duration of i.v. antibiotic treatment (8 days vs 10 days, P=0.04), improved neutrophil recovery (absolute neutrophil count >0.5 x 10(9)/l: 11 days vs 15 days, P<0.001) and reduced the number of days spent in hospital (15 days vs 17 days, P<0.001). The administration of lenograstim after HDT and ASCT significantly reduces the incidence of microbiologically defined infections until neutrophil recovery. It also leads to less use of antibiotics and earlier discharge from hospital.

We prospectively analyzed the incidence, risk factors and outcome of engraftment syndrome (ES) in 112 patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation with different malignancies between January 1999 and December 2003. The median age was 8 years (range 1-18). There were 73 males. There were 37 hematological neoplasias and 75 solid tumors. Disease status at transplantation was early in 49, intermediate in 15 and 48 in advanced phase. The median CD34+ cells infused was 4.6 x 10(6)/kg. With a median follow-up of 23 months (1-116 months), 38 patients developed ES. The cumulative incidence of ES was 34.5 +/- 4.5% and the event-free survival was 58.3 +/- 12%. There were no differences in the causes of death between patients with or without ES. A high number of CD34+ cells/kg infused, patients transplanted in early phase, the type of malignancy (solid tumor) and conditioning regimens other than busulfan based were significantly associated with ES in a multivariate analysis., (Bone Marrow Transplantation (2004).)

The hypercoagulable state caused by the use of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) has been cited in anecdotal reports. Since tissue factor (TF) is the main initiator of the coagulation cascade, we examined if rhG-CSF had an inductive effect on the TF-dependent pathway in 18 healthy donors receiving rhG-CSF (10 microg/kg/day x 5 days) for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization. After rhG-CSF, there were increases both in TF antigen (TF:Ag) (P=0.01) and TF procoagulant activity (TF:PCA) (P=0.06) plasma levels and in TF:Ag cytofluorimetric expression on CD33 (+) cells (P=0.04). Mean activities of FVIII and vWF also increased significantly. Thrombin time was slightly prolonged (P=0.06) due to significant increases in plasma D-dimer levels. In addition, while FIX activity remained stable, there were marked reductions in mean plasma FX and FII activities and a slight decrease in FVII activity that resulted in a significant prolongation of prothrombin time within normal ranges. In conclusion, the administration of rhG-CSF led to a "prothrombotic state" via stimulation of TF and increased endothelial markers, such as F VIII and vWF. In the light of these findings, the use of rhG-CSF for stem cell mobilization should be undertaken cautiously in healthy donors with underlying thrombotic risk factors.

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell rescue is considered a standard part of initial therapy for patients with multiple myeloma. Therefore, potential transplant candidates are generally treated with dexamethasone-based programs rather than alkylating agents to avoid stem cell toxicity. The optimal mobilizing regimen for patients with multiple myeloma has not been defined. However, aggressive chemotherapy may result in excessive morbidity and cost in this older, immunocompromised population. We retrospectively examined our experience with a well-tolerated regimen of 1.5 g/m(2) cyclophosphamide on day -10 followed by 10 microg/kg G-CSF beginning on day -7 in 50 consecutive patients with multiple myeloma and no prior alkylating agent therapy. Median stem cell collection was 4.88 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg per apheresis and 44 patients collected >5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg within 2 days. In 36 patients, more than 10 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were collected including 33 patients who required 1-2 days of collection. One patient required hospitalization for fever/neutropenia and two required weekend apheresis. We conclude that 1.5 g/m(2) cyclophosphamide plus 10 microg/kg G-CSF is a safe, effective, highly predictable mobilizing program that uniformly provided enough stem cells for one transplant and enough stem cells for two transplants.