Search

We describe a natural orifice technique for simultaneous endoluminal lateral suspension of apical vaginal wall and rectal prolapse fixation with ultrasound and fluoroscopic assistance.The technique is minimally invasive, can be performed under regional anaesthesia, and avoids laparotomy or use of a mesh in addition to preserving the uterus.This technique involves suprapubic transvaginal ventral suture colposuspension, fixation of the anterior rectal wall to the undersurface of the anterior abdominal wall and tack fixation of the posterior rectal wall to the underlying sacral promontory through a submucosal tunnel performed endoscopically with fluoroscopic and ultrasound assistance.Seven patients with a mean age of 63 years were followed between 3 to 11 months.This is a novel minimally invasive transluminal procedure that repairs concomitant rectal and vaginal prolapse in the same sitting.Improvement in the instrument design and incorporation of endoluminal robotic systems will enhance the technical ease. The study needs validation in larger series of patients with longer follow-up.

BACKGROUND Technique and functional outcomes of anorectal reconstruction using an antropyloric graft have been reported previously. This technique had reasonable initial outcomes but lacked voluntary function. OBJECTIVE We hereby report the initial results of patients who underwent gracilis muscle wrapping around the perineally transposed antropyloric valve in an attempt to improve voluntary fecal control. SETTING This study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution. PATIENTS Eight adult patients (7 men and 1 woman) with a median age of 38 years (range, 19-51 years) underwent this procedure. Seven patients already had anorectal reconstruction with a transposed antropyloric valve, and 1 patient with severely damaged anal sphincter complex underwent single-stage composite antropylorus transposition with a gracilis muscle wrap. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were anatomical integrity and functional status of the composite graft in the perineum. RESULTS No operative mortality or serious procedure-related morbidity occurred in any patient. The median postoperative resting pressure was 29 mmHg (range, 22-38 mmHg) and squeeze pressure was 72.5 mmHg (range, 45-267 mmHg). There was a significant improvement in the squeeze pressure following surgery (p = 0.039). Also, the St. Mark's incontinence scores significantly improved in all patients and varied between 7 and 9 (p = 0.003). The ability to defer defecation and the reduced frequency of leakage accidents were the prime reasons for improved postgraciloplasty outcomes in these patients. On personal interviews, all patients who underwent this procedure were satisfied with the results of their surgery. LIMITATIONS A longer follow-up with a larger sample size is required. Quality-of-life data have not been evaluated in this study. CONCLUSIONS Gracilis muscle wrapping around a perineally transposed antropyloric valve is possible and improves the voluntary control and overall functional outcomes in a select group of patients with end-stage fecal incontinence requiring anal replacement (Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A173).

BACKGROUND: Technical feasibility of perineal antropyloric valve transposition to reconstruct a severely damaged incontinent anal sphincter or to replace an excised anorectal sphincter has been reported previously. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to document the follow-up results of patients who underwent successful perineal antropyloric valve transposition for end-stage fecal incontinence. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution. PATIENTS: Seventeen patients underwent the procedure. Eight patients had replacement (group 1) and 9 patients had augmentation (group 2) of the anal sphincter. Two patients in group 1 with early graft-related complications were excluded from further analysis, because they had the grafts excised. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were anatomical integrity and functional status of the graft in the perineum, fecal incontinence scores, and quality-of-life scores (SF-36) over a median follow-up of 18 months. RESULTS: The transposed grafts had a definite tone on digital examination, were well visualized on perineal MRI, showed high-velocity vascular inflow on Doppler ultrasound study, and good vascularity on celiac CT angiography. Anal manometry showed a significant (p = 0.03) rise in the postoperative resting neosphincter pressures with good retention of barium proximal to pyloric valve on distal loopogram. The postoperative St Mark incontinence score improved in both groups and was significantly better in group 2 than in group 1. There was significant improvement in postoperative physical and mental component scores in both groups with higher scores in group 2 than in group 1 on follow-up. LIMITATIONS: A longer follow-up with a larger sample size is required. CONCLUSIONS: Antropyloric valve transposition can be used effectively for a selected group of patients with end-stage fecal incontinence. Patients undergoing anal sphincter augmentation have better outcomes in comparison with those having an excised sensate anorectum.