Search

BACKGROUND: Spinal anesthesia in elderly patients is frequently associated with significant technical difficulties. Thus, we compared the classical midline approach to the paramedian approach to perform continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA). METHODS: We prospectively studied 40 patients aged >75 yr who underwent open surgical repair of a hip fracture. These patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups: Group M: midline approach, and Group PM: paramedian approach. Patients were positioned in the lateral decubitus to receive CSA at L4-5 level. CSA was considered successful if cerebrospinal fluid was obtained through the needle. In case of initial failure in either approach, the same approach was repeated by the same operator. If two attempts were unsuccessful, the other anatomical approach was used by the same operator. If both approaches failed, a staff anesthesiologist performed a final attempt. In case of failure or insufficient block, the patient received general anesthesia. RESULTS: The success rate after the first attempt was 85% (17) for Group PM and 45% (9) for Group M (P = 0.02). All catheters were successfully introduced. No patient required general anesthesia. Vascular puncture after needle puncture was observed in six patients in Group M versus 0 in Group PM (P = 0.03), but none were of clinical consequence. No other clinically significant complications were observed. CONCLUSION: In summary, after the initial attempt, the paramedian approach is associated with an increased success rate, compared with the midline approach, during the performance of CSA in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND The lateral sciatic mid-femoral block (LSMF), proved to be reliable, safe, and effective on both branches of the sciatic nerve with a single injection. However, we do not know which component of the sciatic nerve (the tibial [T] or the common peroneal [CP]) produces a better success rate when performing a LSMF with a single injection technique. In this prospective study we compared the success rate of the T motor response with the CP motor response. METHODS Ninety-five patients undergoing ankle or foot surgery were enrolled. Thirty milliliters of 0.475% ropivacaine was injected at the first evoked motor response, either T or CP, with a minimal intensity between 0.3 and 0.5 mA. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were included in group T and 23 in group CP. The block was considered a success when a complete sensory block of the sciatic nerve was obtained. The success rate was 90% (65) for the T response and 70% (16) for the CP response (P < 0.05). Time to perform the block (CP: 4.5 +/- 3 min vs T: 4.5 +/- 4 min; P = NS) as well as sensory and motor onset times were not significantly different between groups. No complications were observed in either group. CONCLUSION We conclude that the evoked motor response of the T branch is associated with a higher success rate than a CP response using the modified LSMF block.