1. Utilization of Visual Acuity Retroilluminated Charts for the Assessment of Afferent Visual System Dysfunction in a Pediatric Neuroimmunology Population
- Author
-
Morgan C McCreary, Peter V Sguigna, Leslie Benson, Jennifer Graves, Amy Waldman, Benjamin Greenberg, and Darrel L Conger
- Subjects
Male ,Optic Neuritis ,Visual acuity ,Adolescent ,genetic structures ,Population ,Visual Acuity ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pupil Disorders ,Afferent ,medicine ,Humans ,Optic neuritis ,Child ,education ,education.field_of_study ,Monocular ,business.industry ,Vision Tests ,Significant difference ,Diabetic retinopathy ,medicine.disease ,eye diseases ,Clinical trial ,Ophthalmology ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,030221 ophthalmology & optometry ,Optometry ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,medicine.symptom ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Background Visual acuity has been a significant outcome measure in clinical trials for patients suffering from neuro-ophthalmological diseases and multiple sclerosis; however, there are limited data on the comparison of various testing strategies in pediatric patients with these disorders. Clinical trials using vision as an outcome could include a variety of tools to assess the acuity, including 2-m and 4-m standardized retroilluminated charts. Methods We investigated the difference in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scores obtained using 2-m and 4-m charts, as well as the impact of optic neuritis, use of vision correction, age, and gender on visual acuity data from 71 patients with pediatric neuroimmunological conditions in a cross-sectional study. Results We determine that the ETDRS letter scores obtained using 4-m charts are on average 3.43 points less (P = 0.0034) when testing monocular ETDRS letter scores and on average 4.14 points less (P = 0.0008) when testing binocular ETDRS letter scores, relative to that obtained using the 2-m charts. However, we find that when performing monocular testing, optic neuritis in the eye being tested did not result in a statistically significant difference between 2-m and 4-m ETDRS letter scores. Conclusions Although visual acuity charts are formatted by the distance, there are significant differences in the number of letters correctly identified between 2-m and 4-m charts. Although the differences may not impact the clinical acuity, research protocols should consider these differences before collapsing data across disparate studies.
- Published
- 2020