Search

OBJECTIVES: Given the significant overlap of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) with other common childhood illnesses presenting to the emergency department, extensive workup of this syndrome has become necessary. Nevertheless, little has been published on the factors differentiating MIS-C from other conditions in the acute care setting. We investigated differences in presentation and laboratory studies between suspected versus confirmed MIS-C patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on patients 21 years or younger undergoing investigation for possible MIS-C at a single institution between April 21 and July 1, 2020. The primary outcome was diagnosis of MIS-C or an alternative final diagnosis. Clinical features and laboratory findings from initial presentation were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients (median, 4 years; 55.7% male) were included, of whom 17 (16%) of 106 met the criteria for MIS-C. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children patients were significantly more likely to report a coronavirus disease 2019 exposure (odds ratio (OR), 13.17 [3.87-44.9]), have gastrointestinal symptoms (OR, 3.81 [1.02-14.19]), and have a significantly higher odds of having abnormal laboratory values including high-sensitivity troponin T (OR, 13 [4.0-42.2]), N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide (OR, 8.4 [2.3-30.1]), D-dimer (OR, 13 [1.6-103]), and ferritin (OR, 7.8 [2.2-27.2]). There were also differences between groups in inflammatory markers: C-reactive protein (median, 134.45 mg/L vs 12.6 mg/L; P < 0.05) and procalcitonin (1.71 ng/mL vs 0.14 ng/mL; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher elevations in key laboratory studies may help to distinguish between MIS-C patients and non-MIS-C patients presenting to the emergency department.

Despite the aligned histories, development, and contemporary practices, today, pediatric anesthesiologists are largely absent from pediatric intensive care units. Contributing to this divide are deficits in exposure to pediatric intensive care at all levels of training in anesthesia and significant credentialing barriers. These observations have led us to consider, does the current structure of training lead to the ability to optimally innovate and collaborate in the delivery of pediatric critical care? We consider how redesigning the pediatric critical care training pathway available for pediatric anesthesiologists may improve care of children both in and out of the operating room by facilitating further sharing of skills, research, and clinical experience. To do so, we review the nuances of both training tracts and the potential benefits and challenges of facilitating greater integration of these aligned fields.

Safety assessment codes (SACs) are one method to evaluate adverse events and determine the need for a root cause analysis. Few facilities currently use SACs, and there is no literature examining their interrater reliability. Two independent raters assigned frequency, actual harm, and potential harm ratings to a sample of patient safety reports. An actual and potential SAC were determined. Percent agreement and Cohen's κ were calculated. Substantial agreement existed for the actual SAC (κ = 0.626, P < .001), fair agreement for the potential SAC (κ = 0.266, P < .001), and low agreement for potential harm (κ = 0.171, P = .002). Although there is subjectivity in all aspects of assigning SACs, the greatest is in potential severity. This presents a problem when using the potential SAC and is in agreement with previous literature showing significant subjectivity in determining potential harm. An operational framework is needed to strengthen reliability.

Although there has been tremendous progress in quality improvement (QI) education for students and trainees in recent years, much less has been published regarding the training of active clinicians in QI. The Partners Clinical Process Improvement Leadership Program (CPIP) is a 6-day experiential program. Interdisciplinary teams complete a QI project framed by didactic sessions, interactive exercises, case-based problem sessions, and a final presentation. A total of 239 teams composed of 516 individuals have graduated CPIP. On completion, participant satisfaction scores average 4.52 (scale 1-5) and self-reported understanding of QI concepts improved. At 6 months after graduation, 66% of survey respondents reported sustained QI activity. Three opportunities to improve the program have been identified: (1) increasing faculty participation through online and tiered course offerings, (2) integrating the faculty-focused program with the trainee curriculum, and (3) developing a postgraduate curriculum to address the challenges of sustained improvement.

Venipuncture is common in children, and topical anesthetics are often used to alleviate the pain of the procedure. The J-Tip (National Medical Products, Inc, Irvine, Calif) device has become popular as a rapid and effective means of delivering lidocaine noninvasively. We report a case of a positive lidocaine blood toxicology screen after the use of the J-Tip device in a child pre-venipuncture. A repeat toxicology screen obtained 1 hour later by venipuncture without J-Tip use was negative. This report serves to remind clinicians that topical anesthetics may interfere with toxicology assays, leading to unreliable toxicology results.

Introduction: Criteria for postoperative hospitalization following adenotonsillectomy are known and often patients are admitted to the pediatric intensive care (PICU). Whether PICU interventions occur has implications in correct resource allocation. Methods: A cohort of PICU admissions for obstructi