Search

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive value regarding postoperative hearing benefit of electrically evoked auditory brainstem response audiometry in sporadic vestibular schwannoma patients undergoing simultaneous tumor resection and cochlear implantation. DESIGN Patients were included in a prospective study conducted between October 2016 and January 2019. SETTING The study was conducted at a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS Subjects with unilateral sporadic vestibular schwannoma were screened for study participation. Patients underwent translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation simultaneously. INTERVENTION Electrically evoked brainstem response audiometry was performed during surgery before and after tumor removal using an intracochlear test electrode to objectively evaluate nerve conduction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Electrically evoked brainstem response audiometry results were correlated with postoperative sound field audiometry, word recognition tests, and speech reception thresholds. Quality of life was assessed before and 12 months after translabyrinthine tumor removal and cochlear implantation. RESULTS Five patients, three male and two female, were included in the study and followed for at least 1 year after implantation. Three of the five patients are daily cochlear implant users with open set speech recognition. Two individuals with negative intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response results showed no auditory perception with cochlear implant. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous translabyrinthine vestibular schwannoma resection and cochlear implantation with intraoperative electrically evoked auditory brainstem response measurements is a feasible and promising option for sporadic vestibular schwannoma patients. Preservation of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses seems to predict good subsequent hearing outcomes.

Background Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage associated with incomplete sealing of the dura mater is a major complication of intradural procedures. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of adjunctive TachoSil (Takeda Pharma A/S, Roskilde, Denmark) with current practice for the prevention of postoperative CSF leaks in patients undergoing elective skull base surgery involving dura mater closure. Methods Patients were intraoperatively randomized to TachoSil or current practice immediately before primary dura closure by suturing ± duraplasty. Choice of adjunctive treatment in the current practice group was at the surgeon's discretion. Primary efficacy endpoint was occurrence of clinically evident verified postoperative CSF leak or clinically evident pseudomeningocele within 7 weeks after surgery or treatment failure (third application of trial treatment or use of other treatment). Results A total of 726 patients were randomized to TachoSil (n = 361) or current practice (n = 365). More current practice patients had sutures plus duraplasty for primary dura closure compared with TachoSil (49.6% vs 35.7%) and fewer had sutures only (45.5% vs 63.2%). The primary endpoint of estimated leak rate favored TachoSil with events in 25 (6.9%) patients vs 30 (8.2%) current practice patients; however, this was not statistically significant (odds ratio: 0.82; 95% confidence interval: 0.47, 1.43; P = .485). Both treatments were well tolerated with similar frequency of adverse events. Conclusion Very low rates of postoperative CSF leaks can be achieved in patients undergoing skull base surgery of various indications. Although the study did not meet its primary endpoint, TachoSil appears to be safe and effective for the prevention of CSF leaks and associated complications.

A retrospective assessment of 809 patients operated on in 1990-1998 was performed. A patient-based outcome questionnaire also was incorporated into the study. The outcome was graded according to the Functional Economic Rating scale. A total of 64% of the patients were relieved of their complaints 3.2-10.2 years (median 6.3 years) after lumbar disc surgery. An excellent outcome, defined as Prolo scale of 9 or 10, was achieved in 55.8%, a good outcome (Prolo scale 7 or 8) in 20.7%, a fair outcome (Prolo scale 5 or 6) in 11.4%, and a poor outcome (Prolo scale of

During the years 1985 to 1992, we encountered 59 patients with meningiomas involving the space of the cavernous sinus. In 29 of these patients, meningiomas were primarily located within the space of the cavernous sinus and were operated on without mortality and with low morbidity. A small subtemporal surgical approach was favored, which allowed initial tumor resection from the posterior aspect, where the Parkinson's triangle is wide, thus avoiding the additional morbidity of large-scale approaches. According to the relationships of the all-important cranial nerves passing within the lateral wall of the cavernous sinus, we divided the primary intracavernous meningiomas into four types, which reflected not only the preoperative cranial nerve deficit but also the feasibility of surgical resection. Cranial nerve function deteriorated after operations in 14% of oculomotor nerves, in one abducent nerve, in 58% of trochlear nerves, and in 21% of trigeminal nerves. We encountered improvement of function in 43% of oculomotor nerves, in 50% of abducent nerves, and in approximately 30% of the second and third but in only 7% of the first branches of trigeminal nerves. There was no improvement in trochlear nerve function. Improvement of oculomotor nerve function was observed only in moderately impaired nerves, which indicates that surgery should be undertaken early to preserve or improve oculomotor nerve function.

We present 25 pituitary adenomas that were confirmed surgically to have invaded the cavernous sinus space. The surgical results are compared with the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings. For comparable radiological criteria, we classified parasellar growth into five grades. This proposed classification is based on coronal sections of unenhanced and gadolinium diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans, with the readily detectable internal carotid artery serving as the radiological landmark. The anatomical, radiological, and surgical conditions of each grade are considered. Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 are distinguished from each other by a medial tangent, the intercarotid line--through the cross-sectional centers--and a lateral tangent on the intra- and supracavernous internal carotid arteries. Grade 0 represents the normal condition, and Grade 4 corresponds to the total encasement of the intracavernous carotid artery. According to this classification, surgically proven invasion of the cavernous sinus space was present in all Grade 4 and Grade 3 cases and in all but one of the Grade 2 cases; no invasion was present in Grade 0 and Grade 1 cases. Therefore, the critical area where invasion of the cavernous sinus space becomes very likely and can be proven surgically is located between the intercarotid line and the lateral tangent, which is represented by our Grade 2. We also measured tumor growth rates, using the monoclonal antibody KI-67, which shows a statistically higher proliferation rate (P < 0.001) in adenomas with surgically observed invasion into the cavernous sinus space, as compared with noninvasive adenomas.