Search

Patients with traumatic pelvic ring injury may present with hypotension secondary to hemorrhage. Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) and angioembolization (AE) are alternative interventions for management of hypotension associated with pelvic ring injury refractory to resuscitation and circumferential compression. We hypothesized that PPP may be independently associated with increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared with AE in patients with hypotension and pelvic ring injury.Adult patients with pelvic ring injury and hypotension managed with PPP or AE were retrospectively identified in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database from 2015 to 2019. Patients were matched on a propensity score for receiving PPP based on patient, injury, and treatment factors. The primary outcome was the risk of VTE after matching on the propensity score for treatment. The secondary outcomes included inpatient clinically important deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, mortality, unplanned reoperation, sepsis, surgical site infection, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay.In this study, 502 patients treated with PPP and 2,439 patients treated with AE met inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching on age, smoking status, Injury Severity Score, Tile B or C pelvic ring injury, bilateral femoral fracture, serious head injury, units of plasma and platelets given within 4 hours of admission, laparotomy, and level-I trauma center facility designation, 183 patients treated with PPP and 183 patients treated with AE remained. PPP, compared with AE, was associated with a 9.8% greater absolute risk of VTE, 6.5% greater risk of clinically important deep vein thrombosis, and 4.9% greater risk of respiratory failure after propensity score matching.PPP for the management of hypotension associated with pelvic ring injury is associated with higher rates of inpatient VTE events and sequelae compared with AE.Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVE To compare immediate quality of open reduction of femoral neck fractures by alternative surgical approaches. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. PATIENTS Eighty adults 18-65 years of age with isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or -B3 femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. INTERVENTION Thirty-two modified Smith-Petersen anterior approaches versus 48 Watson-Jones anterolateral approaches for open reduction performed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME Reduction quality as assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. RESULTS No difference was observed in the rate of acceptable reduction by modified Smith-Petersen (81%) versus Watson-Jones (81%) approach (risk difference null, 95% confidence interval -17.4% to 17.4%, P = 1.00) with 90.4% panel agreement (Fleiss' weighted κ = 0.63, P < 0.01). Stratified analyses did not identify a significant difference in the rate of acceptable reduction between approaches when stratified by Pauwels angle, basicervical or transcervical fracture location, or posterior comminution. The Smith-Petersen approach afforded a better reduction when preoperative skeletal traction was not applied (RR = 1.67 [95% CI 1.10-2.52] vs. RR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.70-1.08], P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS No difference was observed in the quality of open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in young adults when a Watson-Jones anterolateral approach versus a modified Smith-Petersen anterior approach was performed by orthopaedic trauma surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVES To determine if the relative distance between the acetabular teardrops on unstressed and lateral compressive stress examination under anesthesia (EUA) pelvic fluoroscopic images is reproducible between independent reviewers. DESIGN Retrospective database review. SETTING Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS/INTERVENTION Fifty-eight patients with a lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injury who underwent EUA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Validation of EUA objective measurements between blinded, independent reviewers using interclass and intraclass correlation coefficients. RESULTS There was excellent interobserver and intraobserver reliability between all reviewers. Values for each intraclass correlation coefficients (including 95% confidence intervals) were between 0.96 (0.95-0.098) and 0.99 (0.99-0.99) for all measurements. P values were

Objectives To determine (1) which factors are associated with the choice to perform an open reduction and (2) by adjusting for these factors, if the choice of reduction method is associated with reoperation. Design Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and chart review. Setting Twelve Level 1 North American trauma centers. Patients Two hundred thirty-four adults 18-65 years of age with an isolated, displaced, OTA/AO type 31-B2 or type 31-B3 femoral neck fracture treated with internal fixation with minimum of 6-month follow-up or reoperation. Exclusion criteria were pathologic fractures, associated femoral head or shaft fractures, and primary arthroplasty. Intervention Open or closed reduction technique during internal fixation. Main outcome Cox proportional hazard of reoperation adjusting for propensity score for open reduction based on injury, demographic, and medical factors. Reduction quality was assessed by 3 senior orthopaedic traumatologists as "acceptable" or "unacceptable" on AP and lateral postoperative radiographs. Results Median follow-up was 1.5 years. One hundred six (45%) patients underwent open reduction. Reduction quality was not significantly affected by open versus closed approach (71% vs. 69% acceptable, P = 0.378). The propensity to receive an open reduction was associated with study center; younger age; male sex; no history of injection drug use, osteoporosis, or cerebrovascular disease; transcervical fracture location; posterior fracture comminution; and surgery within 12 hours. A total of 35 (33%) versus 28 (22%) reoperations occurred after open versus closed reduction (P = 0.056). Open reduction was associated with a 2.4-fold greater propensity-adjusted hazard of reoperation (95% confidence interval 1.3-4.4, P = 0.004). A total of 35 (15%) patients underwent subsequent total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. Conclusions Open reduction of displaced femoral neck fractures in nonelderly adults is associated with a greater hazard of reoperation without significantly improving reduction. Prospective randomized trials are indicated to confirm a causative effect of open versus closed reduction on outcomes after femoral neck fracture. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Removal of internal fixation implants previously placed to stabilize posterior pelvic ring injuries may be technically challenging. Described techniques for extraction require specialized equipment, extensile measures, or purchase of additional implants. We describe a technique for removal of large diameter cannulated screws and washers from the posterior pelvic ring, which requires no additional equipment or implants beyond the instrumentation used for implant insertion, as well as a series of 15 cases in which the technique was applied.

Objectives Clinical practice has shifted from therapeutic anticoagulation of any lower extremity venous thromboembolism (VTE) to only thromboses with risk of proximal extension or embolization-clinically important VTE (CIVTE). Isolated operative fractures of the tibia or distal bone of the lower extremity are associated with low-to-intermediate VTE risk, and there is wide variability in the choice to anticoagulate as well as anticoagulant. We sought to evaluate the role for chemoprophylaxis of VTE and CIVTE in these injuries by meta-analysis of Level I evidence. Data sources Articles in English, Chinese, French, and German in MEDLINE, Biosis, and EMBASE from 1988 to 2016. Study selection Randomized controlled trials describing chemoprophylaxis of VTE after operative management of fractures of the tibia and distal bones. Independent review of 1502 citations yielded 5 studies (1181 patients) meeting inclusion criteria. Data extraction Chemoprophylaxis regimen, VTE, CIVTE, and major bleeding events were recorded. Study quality was assessed with regard to randomization, outcome assessment allocation and treatment concealment, and commercial funding. Data synthesis A random-effects model meta-analysis determined that chemoprophylaxis with a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) compared with placebo or no intervention significantly reduced the risk of any VTE [pooled relative risk (RR) = 0.696, 95% confidence interval (0.490-0.989), P = 0.043; homogeneity P = 0.818, I = 0%]. However, chemoprophylaxis with a LMWH compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the risk of CIVTE [RR = 0.865, 95% confidence interval (pooled RR = 0.112-3.863), P = 0.790; homogeneity P = 0.718, I = 0%]. No major bleeding events occurred. Funnel plots did not suggest publication bias. The number needed to treat was 31 patients treated with chemoprophylaxis using a LMWH to prevent 1 VTE and 584 patients to prevent 1 CIVTE. Conclusions Meta-analysis of Level I evidence suggests that routine postoperative anticoagulation after surgical management of an isolated fracture of the tibia or distal bone in patients without risk factors for VTE is unlikely to provide a clinical benefit, based on the absence of a treatment effect for preventing VTE warranting therapeutic anticoagulation. Level of evidence Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.