Search

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) and endothelial cell density (ECD) with laser scanning confocal microscope Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) II Rostock Corneal Module and noncontact specular microscope Tomey EM-3000 and to assess intra- and interobserver agreement in normal corneas.This prospective study included 48 normals (69.6 ± 7.2 years, range: 55-80 years) who underwent CCT and ECD with both Tomey and HRT 3 times by 2 independent observers. Measurement differences between instruments, agreement between devices, and test-retest variability (TRV) were determined.Mean CCTs with Tomey and HRT were 529.4 ± 35.4 and 536 ± 37.6 μm (P = 0.06), respectively; average ECDs with Tomey and HRT were 2473.5 ± 242.2 and 2539.7 ± 338.6 cells per square millimeter (P = 0.04), respectively. The mean of the differences (HRT minus Tomey) was 6.5 ± 17 μm for CCT and 65 ± 135.1 cells per square millimeter for ECD. Differences between instruments were not related to CCT (P = 0.35), whereas significantly increased with increasing ECD (P = 0.0001). Intraexaminer TRV for Tomey and HRT were 3.9 ± 3.7 and 22.2 ± 18.4 μm for CCT and 73 ± 63.4 and 152.2 ± 148.4 cells per square millimeter for ECD, respectively; interexaminer TRV was 4.6 ± 4.2 and 23.8 ± 17.3 μm for CCT and 84.9 ± 72.3 and 159.8 ± 149.8 cells per square millimeter for ECD.HRT II Rostock Corneal Module and the Tomey EM-3000 showed an overall good intermethod agreement. HRT showed a tendency to slightly overestimate CCT measurements, significantly underestimate ECD measurements in eyes with a reduced cell density (2290 cells per square millimeter), and overestimate ECD in eyes with a high cell density. Both instruments showed low intra- and interobserver TRV for both CCT and ECD measurements, which tended to be less for Tomey.

Purpose To evaluate the optic disc damage staging system (ODDSS); a new clinical method of optic disc (OD) classification based on OD size, neural rim (NR) loss severity and localization. Accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability were studied. Agreement of ODDSS with the Heidelberg-Retina-Tomograph (HRT) results was evaluated. Methods One eye of 68 consecutive open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and 40 controls underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), HRT-II, and OD examination using the ODDSS classification by 3 independent graders in this prospective cross-sectional study. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AROC) in discriminating between normal and POAG eyes were determined for ODDSS and HRT parameters. ODDSS intraobserver and interobserver agreement and agreement with HRT-Moorfield-Regression-Analysis (MRA) were assessed. Results ODDSS sensitivity ranged from 72.0% to 89.7%; specificity ranged from 92.5% to 100%. Differences between AROCs for ODDSS (0.89 to 0.94) and for the best-performing HRT parameter (Vertical Cup/Disc Ratio 0.88) were not statistically significant. ODDSS interobserver agreement ranged from 0.33 to 0.78; intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.53 to 0.89. Agreement with HRT-MRA ranged from 0.50 to 0.87. Conclusions ODDSS is a new method for assessing, recording, and sharing information about the clinical OD appearance. Our preliminary results show that it provides good sensitivity and specificity in glaucoma detection. The interobserver and intraobserver agreement ranged from fair to good.

Purpose: To investigate short-term effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (Lucentis) (IVIL). Materials and Methods: This prospective study included 1 eye of 54 patients (64 ± 12 y) with wet age-related macular degeneration treated with IVIL. IOP measurements with TonoPen were taken: immediately before and 5 seconds, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes, and 1 day after IVIL. Axial length (with ultrasound biometry) was assessed in 24 eyes. The analysis included IOP difference at various time points and between phakic and pseudophakic eyes and the relationship between axial length and IOP increases after 5 seconds. Results: Mean IOP were 16.3 ± 3.0 mm Hg (range: 12.0 to 21.3), 44.1 ± 10.6 (22.0 to 59.3), 29.0 ± 9.6 (15.0 to 49.0), 25.8 ± 7.9 (16.0 to 45.0), 23.7 ± 6.6 (15.7 to 39.0), 21.9 ± 5.6 (14.7 to 37.0), 18.8 ± 6.1 (10.0 to 35.0), and 16.1 ± 3.0 (11.0 to 21.0), respectively, for time points immediately before, 5 seconds, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 minutes, and 1 day after IVIL. Differences between before IVIL and after IVIL IOP were statistically significant after 5 seconds, 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes (P = 0.0001); however, were not significant after 1 hour (P = 0.064) and 1 day (P = 0.449). Differences between phakic and pseudophakic eyes were not significant (P>0.05). The relationship between shorter axial length and IOP increase after 5 seconds was significant (linear regression analysis; R 2 = 0.28, P = 0.007). Conclusions: IVIL causes a considerable short-term transient rise in IOP. The IOP increase after IVIL can be statistically significant at 0 to 30 minutes after injection in both phakic and pseudophakic eyes, and tends to be greater in shorter eyes.

Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken with the new ICare tonometer and with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) and to evaluate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on the IOP measurements. Patients and Methods: One eye of 178 consecutive patients with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent ultrasonic CCT measurement, followed by IOP evaluation with the GAT and with the ICare tonometer. The deviation of ICare readings from GAT values, corrected according to the Doughty and Zaman formula, was calculated and correlated to CCT by a linear regression model. The agreement between the 2 devices was assessed by use of the Bland-Altman method. Results: The average CCT was 552 ± 39mm. The mean IOP and the mean corrected IOP with GAT were 19.4 ± 5.4 mm Hg, and 18.5 ± 5.7 mm Hg, respectively. The mean ICare IOP reading was 18.4 ± 5.2 mm Hg. The deviations of ICare readings from corrected GAT values were highly correlated with CCT values (r = 0.63, P

To assess the Humphrey Matrix 30-2 test in detecting functional glaucomatous damage.One eye in each of 60 healthy individuals, 108 patients with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 150 patients with preperimetric (48) or perimetric (102) high-tension primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were considered. Visual fields were assessed by the standard automated perimetry (SAP) Humphrey Field Analyzer 30-2, frequency doubling technology (FDT) N-30, and Humphrey Matrix 30-2 tests. Significantly abnormal points in the pattern deviation probability plot, testing time, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the FDT tests were evaluated.FDT revealed a significantly greater percentage of depressed points than did SAP in OHT and preperimetric POAG eyes. The FDT-N-30 test showed a significantly greater percentage of areas with P5% in the OHT, preperimetric POAG, and early POAG groups. The Matrix-30-2 test provided an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve slightly lower than the FDT-N-30 test in the preperimetric POAG group, and significantly greater in the perimetric POAG group.FDT perimetry appeared more sensitive than SAP in detecting early glaucomatous VF loss. The FDT-N-30 test showed a slightly higher ability to detect early glaucomatous damage in patients at risk for the development of glaucoma, whereas the Matrix-30-2 test provided a more detailed characterization of the glaucomatous VF loss pattern, although it required 30% more time.