Search

Spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) is a minimally invasive technique for treating sagittal synostosis in young infants. Yet, follow-up data on cranial growth in patients who have undergone SAC are lacking. This project aimed to understand how the cranial shape develops during the postoperative period, from spring insertion to removal. 3D head scans of 30 consecutive infants undergoing SAC for sagittal synostosis were acquired using a handheld scanner pre-operatively, immediately postoperatively, at follow-up and at spring removal; 3D scans of 41 age-matched control subjects were also acquired. Measurements of head length, width, height, circumference, and volume were taken for all subjects; cephalic index (CI) was calculated. Statistical shape modeling was used to compute 3D average head models of sagittal patients at the different time points. SAC was performed at a mean age of 5.2 months (range 3.3-8.0) and springs were removed 4.3 months later. CI increased significantly (P < 0.001) from pre-op (69.5% ± 2.8%) to spring removal (74.4% ± 3.9%), mainly due to the widening of head width, which became as wide as for age-matched controls; however, the CI of controls was not reached (82.3% ± 6.8%). The springs did not constrain volume changes and allowed for natural growth. Population mean shapes showed that the bony prominences seen at the sites of spring engagement settle over time, and that springs affect the overall 3D head shape of the skull. In conclusion, results reaffirmed the effectiveness of SAC as a treatment method for nonsyndromic single suture sagittal synostosis.

Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. Background: The incidence of midline frontonasal dermoid cysts is one in 20,000 to one in 40,000. These lesions may have intracranial extension. This is explained by the anatomy and embryology of nasofrontal development. Skin involvement may also be extensive. Incomplete excision frequently leads to recurrence. The authors report their experience and pathway for management of midline dermoids. Methods: Databases were searched to identify patients who had undergone surgery for removal of a dermoid cyst. Preoperative imaging and indications for surgery were reviewed. Cases were grouped according to surgical approach, and outcomes and complications were identified. Results: Fifty-five patients were treated. Magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography was used to delineate the anatomy, and surgical excision was expedited if there was a history of infection, especially if imaging suggested intracranial extension. Twelve patients were treated endoscopically (one was converted to open). Eleven required transcranial approaches for intracranial extension (20 percent). Of these, one lesion breached the dura. The remaining 32 patients had dermoids excised with an open approach (direct, bicoronal, or rhinoplasty). There were no recurrences in the open group and there was one recurrence in the transcranial group. This was treated by reexcision. Conclusion: Midline dermoid cysts are relatively uncommon. However, knowledge of the pathogenesis of these lesions together with the authors' experience over 15 years has allowed them to develop a protocol-driven approach, with a low incidence of complications.