Search

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is characterized by inability of faulty pancreatic β-cells to secret a normal amount of insulin to maintain normal body consumption, and/or peripheral tissue has a decreased susceptibility to insulin, resulting in hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Similar to other chronic systemic inflammatory diseases, DM is a result from dysregulated interactions between ethnic, genetic, epigenetic, immunoregulatory, hormonal, and environmental factors. Therefore, it is rational to suppose the concept as "To do one and to get more", while using antidiabetic agents (ADA), a main pharmacologic agent for the treatment of DM, can provide an extraglycemia effect on comorbidities or concomittent comorbidities to DM. In this review, based on the much strong correlation between DM and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver diseases (MAFLD) shown by similar pathophysiological mechanisms and a high prevalence of DM in MAFLD and its vice versa (a high prevalence of MAFLD in DM), it is possible to use the strategy to target both diseases simultaneously. We focus on a new classification of ADA, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP1R) agonist and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors to show the potential benefits of extraglycemic effect on MAFLD. We conclude that the management of DM patients, especially for those who need ADA as adjuvant therapy should include healthy lifestyle modification to overcome the metabolic syndrome, contributing to the urgent need of an effective weight-reduction strategy. GLP1R agonist is one of effective body weight-lowering medications, which may be a better choice for DM complicated with MAFLD or its-associated severe form as metabolic associated steatohepatitis (MASH), although the role of SGLT-2 inhibitors is also impressive. The prescription of these two classes of ADA may satisfy the concept "To do one and to get more", based on successful sugar-lowering effect for controlling DM and extraglycemia benefits of hepatoprotective activity in DM patients.

Effective strategies are urgently needed to decrease the risk of untoward outcomes of pregnant women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) infection. Pregnant women are a vulnerable population to infectious disease pandemics with dramatically increased infectious diseases-related serious complications, such as the need of hospitalizations, the need of admission to intensive care unit, and the final disease-related death compared with those nonpregnant counterparts or those pregnant women without infection. Several studies have shown that vaccinations in pregnancy are a safe and highly effective strategy, not only for pregnant women but also for fetus and/or newborn because of the passive transplacental transfer of antibodies to the offspring. Active and passive prevention of infectious diseases is approved as effective strategies for women who attempt to become pregnant or during pregnancy. Despite the large and proven scientific evidence, pregnant women still puzzle over whether they should get vaccinated. The question therefore arises: Why are pregnant women so reluctant to receive vaccination? The explanation is more likely in the way that the benefits of vaccination have been communicated "confusedly." In fact, like virtually all clinical trials, all the COVID-19 vaccine trials have excluded pregnant and lactating women from participating, contributing to uncertainty of safety and efficacy in COVID-19 vaccines that have been well prepared and available for the general adult population worldwide. Moreover, messenger RNA vaccine is a relatively brand-new vaccine, and experience with this type of vaccine is still scarce. It is hard to overcome this innovation deadlock. The knowledge and awareness of pregnant women who are at risk, and full information on the knowledge of vaccines and related preventable diseases in pregnant women may avoid hesitancy and increase vaccine acceptance. The current review is a part two addressing the impact of COVID-19 on pregnant women. We focus on the up-to-date information about the application of vaccination on pregnant women, especially during this COVID-19 pandemic.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (coronavirus disease 2019, COVID-19) is a pandemic disease with rapidly and widely disseminating to the world. Based on experiences about the H1N1, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) coronavirus pandemics, pregnant women who are infected are disproportionately more likely to develop severe illness and need more hospitalizations, intensive care, and finally die of diseases compared with those nonpregnant counterparts or those pregnant women without infection. Although more than one half of pregnant women with COVID-19 are asymptomatic, and as well as their symptoms are frequently mild, this observation presents a further challenge regarding service provision, prevention, and management, in which this may result in overlooking the risk of COVID-19 during pregnancy. As predictable, despite much advance in critical care in recent decades, during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant women with COVID-19 are really at higher risk to progress to severe illness; require hospitalization; need intensive care, such as the use of mechanical ventilation as well as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and of most important, die than their nonpregnant counterparts and pregnant women without COVID-19. The magnitude of the risk to pregnant women further extend to their newborn from COVID-19 with resultant significantly increasing perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality rates. The heightened risk of untoward outcomes in pregnant women emphasizes an urgent need of national or international recommendations and guidelines to optimize prevention and management strategies for COVID-19 in pregnancy. Active and passive prevention of COVID-19 is approved as effective strategies for women who attempt to be pregnant or during pregnancy. Understanding that pregnant women who are a vulnerable population is essential to improve the care in the novel and urgent COVID-19 pandemic. The current review is a part I to summarize the up-to-date information about the impact of laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women and focus on clinical presentations and untoward pregnancy outcomes of these pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2.

The current standard therapy of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the combination of surgery and multiagent chemotherapy with/without adding targeted therapy. After treatment, response rate is high and nearly all patients can achieve complete remission, even though they are advanced diseases; however, the majority of patients will relapse and subsequently die of diseases within several years after initial treatment. When treatment options are limited, there is the urgent need for new novel therapeutic approaches for precise cancer control. The development of chemoresistance and evading of the anticancer immune response may be one of the important causes contributing to the therapeutic failure, and therefore, it represents a paradigm shift in cancer research. An individual's immune response and interaction with EOC cells might be one of the key factors for cancer treatment. There are many interventions, including targeting certain type immunogenic EOC-associated antigens, immune checkpoint blockade, and adoptive cellular therapy, which present a profound opportunity to revolutionize EOC treatment. This review will encompass the interaction between EOC and immune system and highlight recent data regarding the research of immunotherapy in EOC.

Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancers (EAOCs) including endometrioid and clear cell ovarian carcinoma are subgroups of epithelial ovarian carcinomas (EOCs), which is generally acknowledged as the most lethal gynecological malignancy. Endometriosis (ES), a common clinical disease among women, presents with clinical symptoms of pelvic pain, infertility, or adnexal masses with the formation of endometrioma. It has long been considered to be a potential risk factor for developing EOCs, mainly of endometrioid and clear cell subtypes. Here, we compiled data from previous researches on deregulated molecular functions among ES and EOCs using gene set-based integrative analysis to decipher molecular and genetic relationships between ovarian ES and EOCs, especially EAOCs. We conclude that epidermal growth factor receptor (ERBB) and Phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K)-related pathways are important in the carcinogenesis of type I EOCs, including clear cell, endometrioid, and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Dysfunctional molecular pathways, such as deregulated oxidoreductase activity, metabolism, hormone activity, inflammatory response, innate immune response, and cell-cell signaling, played key roles in the malignant transformation of EAOCs. Nine genes related to inflammasome complex and inflammasome-related pathway were identified, indicating the importance of inflammation/immunity in EAOC transformation. We also collect progressive treatments of EAOC focused on targeted therapies and immunotherapy so far. This summarized information can contribute toward effective detection and treatment of EAOCs in the future.

Background: To compare the short-term outcome of patients undergoing single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy (SP-LS) and conventional three-port laparoscopic salpingectomy (C-LS). Methods: A retrospective evaluation of 112 patients with tubal pregnancies treated by one surgeon at a single teaching hospital. Among these, 47 patients were treated with SP-LS and the remaining 65 were treated with C-LS. Results: The characteristics of patients were similar in both groups. There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative and immediate postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay between both groups. Time to bowel recanalization (6.2 ± 1.0 vs. 7.2 ± 1.4 h, p

Although previous studies have suggested a stimulatory role of heparanase in physiological bone turnover, the potential therapeutic role of heparanase in bone healing has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of topical application of heparanase-1 on bone healing.Two different dosages of recombinant mouse heparanase-1 and vehicle control were prepared and delivered via an osmotic pump to provide continuous topical infusion of the therapeutic reagent in a mouse bone defect model at the distal femoral metaphysis. The bone healing progress was evaluated by micro-computed tomography and histological examination at 7, 14, and 21 days after the bone defect was created.The peak of trabecular bone generation was achieved earlier than anticipated with the use of heparanase as measured by medullary bone volume fraction and trabecular number observed in micro-computed tomography, while the remodeling of trabecular bone to cortical bone was also achieved earlier than anticipated with the use of heparanase as measured by connectivity density. Histopathological observation revealed a higher frequency of the presence of cartilaginous tissue in the heparanase-treated groups. Both bone mineral density and cortical bone volume fraction showed the best healing outcome with low-dose heparanase, implying a biphasic effect of its mode of action.These results indicated that with the appropriate dose of topical heparanase-1, the progress of bone healing could be accelerated in vivo.